Gustafsson Philip U, Sikström Sverker, Lindholm Torun
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 10;15:1211987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1211987. eCollection 2024.
In two studies, we examined if correct and incorrect statements in eyewitness testimony differed in semantic content. Testimony statements were obtained from participants who watched staged crime films and were interviewed as eyewitnesses. We analyzed the latent semantic representations of these statements using LSA and BERT. Study 1 showed that the semantic space of correct statements differed from incorrect statements; correct statements were more closely related to a semantic representation, whereas incorrect statements were more closely related to a semantic representation. Study 2 only partially replicated these findings, but a mega-analysis of the two datasets showed different semantic representations for correct and incorrect statements, with incorrect statements more closely related to representations of and Given the critical role of eyewitness testimony in the legal context, and the generally low ability of fact-finders to estimate the accuracy of witness statements, our results strongly call for further research on semantic content in correct and incorrect testimony statements.
在两项研究中,我们考察了目击证人证词中的正确陈述和错误陈述在语义内容上是否存在差异。证词陈述来自观看了模拟犯罪影片并作为目击证人接受询问的参与者。我们使用潜在语义分析(LSA)和双向编码器表征从变换器(BERT)分析了这些陈述的潜在语义表征。研究1表明,正确陈述的语义空间与错误陈述不同;正确陈述与一种语义表征的关系更为密切,而错误陈述与另一种语义表征的关系更为密切。研究2仅部分重复了这些发现,但对这两个数据集的元分析表明,正确陈述和错误陈述具有不同的语义表征,错误陈述与“……”和“……”的表征关系更为密切。鉴于目击证人证词在法律背景中的关键作用,以及事实认定者通常较低的估计证人陈述准确性的能力,我们的结果强烈呼吁对正确和错误证词陈述中的语义内容进行进一步研究。