Department of Psychology, Lund University.
Blekinge Center of Competence, Blekinge County Council.
Psychol Methods. 2019 Feb;24(1):92-115. doi: 10.1037/met0000191. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
Psychological constructs, such as emotions, thoughts, and attitudes are often measured by asking individuals to reply to questions using closed-ended numerical rating scales. However, when asking people about their state of mind in a natural context ("How are you?"), we receive open-ended answers using words ("Fine and happy!") and not closed-ended answers using numbers ("7") or categories ("A lot"). Nevertheless, to date it has been difficult to objectively quantify responses to open-ended questions. We develop an approach using open-ended questions in which the responses are analyzed using natural language processing (Latent Semantic Analyses). This approach of using open-ended, semantic questions is compared with traditional rating scales in nine studies (N = 92-854), including two different study paradigms. The first paradigm requires participants to describe psychological aspects of external stimuli (facial expressions) and the second paradigm involves asking participants to report their subjective well-being and mental health problems. The results demonstrate that the approach using semantic questions yields good statistical properties with competitive, or higher, validity and reliability compared with corresponding numerical rating scales. As these semantic measures are based on natural language and measure, differentiate, and describe psychological constructs, they have the potential of complementing and extending traditional rating scales. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
心理结构,如情绪、思想和态度,通常通过让个体使用封闭式数字评分量表来回答问题进行测量。然而,当我们在自然情境下询问人们的心理状态时(“你好吗?”),我们会收到使用单词(“很好,很开心!”)的开放式回答,而不是使用数字(“7”)或类别(“很多”)的封闭式回答。尽管如此,迄今为止,很难客观地量化对开放式问题的回答。我们使用开放式问题开发了一种方法,其中使用自然语言处理(潜在语义分析)来分析响应。在九项研究(N=92-854)中,包括两种不同的研究范式,比较了这种使用开放式、语义问题的方法与传统评分量表。第一个范式要求参与者描述外部刺激(面部表情)的心理方面,第二个范式要求参与者报告他们的主观幸福感和心理健康问题。结果表明,与相应的数字评分量表相比,使用语义问题的方法具有较好的统计特性,具有竞争力或更高的有效性和可靠性。由于这些语义度量基于自然语言并且测量、区分和描述心理结构,因此它们有可能补充和扩展传统的评分量表。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。