• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义测量:使用自然语言处理来测量、区分和描述心理结构。

Semantic measures: Using natural language processing to measure, differentiate, and describe psychological constructs.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lund University.

Blekinge Center of Competence, Blekinge County Council.

出版信息

Psychol Methods. 2019 Feb;24(1):92-115. doi: 10.1037/met0000191. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1037/met0000191
PMID:29963879
Abstract

Psychological constructs, such as emotions, thoughts, and attitudes are often measured by asking individuals to reply to questions using closed-ended numerical rating scales. However, when asking people about their state of mind in a natural context ("How are you?"), we receive open-ended answers using words ("Fine and happy!") and not closed-ended answers using numbers ("7") or categories ("A lot"). Nevertheless, to date it has been difficult to objectively quantify responses to open-ended questions. We develop an approach using open-ended questions in which the responses are analyzed using natural language processing (Latent Semantic Analyses). This approach of using open-ended, semantic questions is compared with traditional rating scales in nine studies (N = 92-854), including two different study paradigms. The first paradigm requires participants to describe psychological aspects of external stimuli (facial expressions) and the second paradigm involves asking participants to report their subjective well-being and mental health problems. The results demonstrate that the approach using semantic questions yields good statistical properties with competitive, or higher, validity and reliability compared with corresponding numerical rating scales. As these semantic measures are based on natural language and measure, differentiate, and describe psychological constructs, they have the potential of complementing and extending traditional rating scales. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

心理结构,如情绪、思想和态度,通常通过让个体使用封闭式数字评分量表来回答问题进行测量。然而,当我们在自然情境下询问人们的心理状态时(“你好吗?”),我们会收到使用单词(“很好,很开心!”)的开放式回答,而不是使用数字(“7”)或类别(“很多”)的封闭式回答。尽管如此,迄今为止,很难客观地量化对开放式问题的回答。我们使用开放式问题开发了一种方法,其中使用自然语言处理(潜在语义分析)来分析响应。在九项研究(N=92-854)中,包括两种不同的研究范式,比较了这种使用开放式、语义问题的方法与传统评分量表。第一个范式要求参与者描述外部刺激(面部表情)的心理方面,第二个范式要求参与者报告他们的主观幸福感和心理健康问题。结果表明,与相应的数字评分量表相比,使用语义问题的方法具有较好的统计特性,具有竞争力或更高的有效性和可靠性。由于这些语义度量基于自然语言并且测量、区分和描述心理结构,因此它们有可能补充和扩展传统的评分量表。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Semantic measures: Using natural language processing to measure, differentiate, and describe psychological constructs.语义测量:使用自然语言处理来测量、区分和描述心理结构。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Feb;24(1):92-115. doi: 10.1037/met0000191. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
2
Predicting attitudes toward ambiguity using natural language processing on free descriptions for open-ended question measurements.使用自然语言处理对开放式问题测量的自由描述进行歧义预测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 9;14(1):8276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59118-z.
3
Question-based computational language approach outperforms rating scales in quantifying emotional states.基于问题的计算语言方法在量化情绪状态方面优于评分量表。
Commun Psychol. 2024 May 23;2(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00097-2.
4
The Fill-Mask Association Test (FMAT): Measuring propositions in natural language.填充-掩蔽关联测试(FMAT):衡量自然语言中的命题。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Sep;127(3):537-561. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000396. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
5
The Semantic Scale Network: An online tool to detect semantic overlap of psychological scales and prevent scale redundancies.语义量表网络:一种在线工具,用于检测心理量表的语义重叠,防止量表冗余。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Jun;25(3):380-392. doi: 10.1037/met0000244. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
6
Turning words into numbers: Assessing work attitudes using natural language processing.将文字转化为数字:使用自然语言处理评估工作态度。
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Jun;108(6):1027-1045. doi: 10.1037/apl0001061. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
7
Using semantic similarity to understand the psychological constructs related to prosociality.利用语义相似性来理解与亲社会性相关的心理结构。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:226-230. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
8
Assessing the Relationship between Semantic Processing and Thought Disorder Symptoms in Schizophrenia.评估精神分裂症中语义加工与思维紊乱症状之间的关系。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 Sep;21(8):629-38. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715000648. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
9
Assessment of depression and anxiety in young and old with a question-based computational language approach.采用基于问题的计算语言方法评估年轻人和老年人的抑郁与焦虑状况。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2023 Jul 24;2(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s44184-023-00032-z.
10
Let the algorithm speak: How to use neural networks for automatic item generation in psychological scale development.让算法说话:如何在心理量表开发中使用神经网络进行自动项目生成。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Jun;29(3):494-518. doi: 10.1037/met0000540. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing psychological assessment: quantifying self-compassion through free-text responses and language model BERT.推进心理评估:通过自由文本回答和语言模型BERT量化自我同情。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 16;15(1):25778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02801-6.
2
Talk to your data: Introducing text embedding similarity analysis (TESA) in psychological research.与你的数据对话:介绍心理研究中的文本嵌入相似性分析(TESA)。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 May 28;57(7):179. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02698-z.
3
Exploring Biases of Large Language Models in the Field of Mental Health: Comparative Questionnaire Study of the Effect of Gender and Sexual Orientation in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa Case Vignettes.
探索大语言模型在心理健康领域的偏差:神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症病例 vignettes 中性别和性取向影响的比较问卷调查研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Mar 20;12:e57986. doi: 10.2196/57986.
4
ALBA: Adaptive Language-Based Assessments for Mental Health.ALBA:心理健康的适应性语言评估
Proc Conf. 2024 Jun;2024:2466-2478. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.136.
5
Use of 4 Open-Ended Text Responses to Help Identify People at Risk of Gaming Disorder: Preregistered Development and Usability Study Using Natural Language Processing.使用4个开放式文本回复来帮助识别有游戏障碍风险的人:使用自然语言处理的预注册开发和可用性研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Dec 31;12:e56663. doi: 10.2196/56663.
6
How to evaluate lifelong learning skills of healthcare professionals: a systematic review on content and quality of instruments for measuring lifelong learning.如何评估医疗保健专业人员的终身学习技能:关于测量终身学习的工具内容和质量的系统评价
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1423. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06335-9.
7
Question-based computational language approach outperforms rating scales in quantifying emotional states.基于问题的计算语言方法在量化情绪状态方面优于评分量表。
Commun Psychol. 2024 May 23;2(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00097-2.
8
Language or rating scales based classifications of emotions: computational analysis of language and alexithymia.基于语言或评分量表的情绪分类:语言与述情障碍的计算分析
Npj Ment Health Res. 2024 Jul 31;3(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s44184-024-00080-z.
9
Psychophysiological Impact of Touching Landscape Grass among Older Adults.老年人触摸景观草的心理生理影响。
J Urban Health. 2024 Aug;101(4):792-803. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00875-7. Epub 2024 May 13.
10
The semantic structure of accuracy in eyewitness testimony.目击证人证词准确性的语义结构。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 10;15:1211987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1211987. eCollection 2024.