Ruttmann Kirstin, Albaladejo-Fuertes Sheila, Lindenberg Nicole, Kunst Claudia, Mehrl Alexander, Kindl Vera, Gülow Karsten, Schlosser-Hupf Sophie, Schmid Stephan, Müller Martina
Department of Internal Medicine I, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology, and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Nursing Development Department of the Care Management Head Office, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 10;11:1292608. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1292608. eCollection 2024.
Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, global healthcare systems have faced unprecedented challenges, leading to significant psychological distress among healthcare professionals. Recognizing the importance of enhanced interprofessional collaboration in alleviating this burden, as emphasized by the World Health Organization in 2020, we investigated whether such collaboration could mitigate staff psychological distress during crises. To our knowledge, no study has yet explored the role of interprofessional collaboration as a resilience factor in crises.
For this monocentric cross-sectional study at a German university hospital, we examined the relationship between the quality of interprofessional collaboration and the psychological distress of healthcare professionals during the initial pandemic wave. We employed validated mental health instruments, such as the GAD-7 and PHQ-2, to assess anxiety and depressive symptoms. Additionally, custom-designed questionnaires evaluated "Pandemic-Associated Burden and Anxiety (PAB; PAA)" and interprofessional crisis management experiences. A novel "Interprofessional collaboration and communication (IPC)" assessment tool was developed based on international competency frameworks, demonstrating strong reliability.
The study involved 299 healthcare professionals (78.6% in direct contact with COVID-19 patients). Moderate levels of PAB/PAA were reported. However, a significant proportion experienced clinically relevant anxiety, as indicated by GAD-7. Negative IPC perceptions correlated with higher levels of psychological distress. Linear regression analysis showed associations between interprofessional collaboration and anxious and depressive symptoms, and pandemic-related burden.
Our findings highlight the vital role of enhanced interprofessional collaboration in strengthening the psychological well-being of healthcare professionals during crises. The study underscores the need to foster a collaborative environment and integrate interprofessional education for resilience.
自新冠疫情爆发以来,全球医疗系统面临前所未有的挑战,导致医护人员出现严重的心理困扰。认识到加强跨专业协作在减轻这一负担方面的重要性,正如世界卫生组织在2020年所强调的,我们调查了这种协作是否可以在危机期间减轻工作人员的心理困扰。据我们所知,尚无研究探讨跨专业协作作为危机中恢复力因素的作用。
在德国一家大学医院进行的这项单中心横断面研究中,我们考察了跨专业协作质量与医护人员在疫情第一波期间心理困扰之间的关系。我们使用经过验证的心理健康工具,如广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD - 7)和患者健康问卷-2(PHQ - 2)来评估焦虑和抑郁症状。此外,定制问卷评估了“疫情相关负担与焦虑(PAB;PAA)”以及跨专业危机管理经验。基于国际能力框架开发了一种新颖的“跨专业协作与沟通(IPC)”评估工具,显示出很强的可靠性。
该研究涉及299名医护人员(78.6%与新冠患者有直接接触)。报告的PAB/PAA水平为中等。然而,如GAD - 7所示,相当一部分人经历了具有临床意义的焦虑。对IPC的负面认知与更高水平的心理困扰相关。线性回归分析显示跨专业协作与焦虑和抑郁症状以及疫情相关负担之间存在关联。
我们的研究结果突出了加强跨专业协作在危机期间增强医护人员心理健康方面的重要作用。该研究强调了营造协作环境以及整合跨专业教育以增强恢复力的必要性。