Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Dermatol. 2024 Jun;51(6):772-778. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17249. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Recent advances in biologic treatments have made clear skin a realistic treatment goal for psoriasis. However, clear skin may not uniformly translate to an absence of impact on patients' quality of life. This retrospective observational study aimed to elucidate the factors influencing patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis who have demonstrated successful clinician-reported outcomes on using biologics. A total of 96 patients who have achieved a ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores with ≥6 months of biologic treatment were included. Their median PASI score was 0.4, with 37.5% having achieved PASI 100 (clear skin). Furthermore, 47.9% reported no impact of psoriasis on their quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] score 0 or 1), while 52.1% reported a negative impact (DLQI score ≥2). Notably, 28.1% of the participants had a history of biologic treatment failure, defined as the inability to achieve or sustain a 75% PASI improvement with the previously used biologic agent. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a positive association between achieving PASI 100 and reporting no impact of psoriasis on quality of life (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-10.91, P = 0.007). Conversely, prior biologic treatment failure was negatively associated with reporting no impact of psoriasis on quality of life (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.65, P = 0.023). Furthermore, among patients with clear skin, those with experience of previous biologic treatment failure reported significantly lower quality of life than those without such experience (P = 0.033). In conclusion, minimal residual skin lesions and prior biologic treatment failure were associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis. Opting for a biologic agent with the highest predicted efficacy, rather than pursuing a "step-up" approach with a higher possibility of treatment failure, may be a more suitable strategy in the biologic treatment of psoriasis.
生物制剂治疗的最新进展使银屑病患者实现皮肤完全清除成为一个现实的治疗目标。然而,皮肤完全清除并不一定意味着患者的生活质量不受影响。本回顾性观察性研究旨在阐明在接受生物制剂治疗 6 个月以上,达到医师报告的治疗终点(即银屑病面积与严重性指数[PASI]评分改善≥75%)的银屑病患者中,影响患者报告结局的因素。共纳入 96 例达到 PASI 评分改善≥75%(中位数为 0.4,其中 37.5%达到 PASI 100[皮肤完全清除])且生物制剂治疗时间≥6 个月的患者。此外,47.9%的患者报告银屑病对其生活质量无影响(皮肤病生活质量指数[DLQI]评分 0 或 1),52.1%的患者报告银屑病对其生活质量有影响(DLQI 评分≥2)。值得注意的是,28.1%的患者有生物制剂治疗失败史,定义为无法达到或维持先前使用的生物制剂 75%的 PASI 改善。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,达到 PASI 100 与报告银屑病对生活质量无影响之间呈正相关(调整优势比[aOR]3.88,95%置信区间[CI]1.49-10.91,P=0.007)。相反,先前的生物制剂治疗失败与报告银屑病对生活质量无影响呈负相关(aOR 0.13,95%CI 0.02-0.65,P=0.023)。此外,在皮肤完全清除的患者中,有先前生物制剂治疗失败史的患者报告的生活质量明显低于无此病史的患者(P=0.033)。综上所述,皮肤存在微小残留皮损和先前的生物制剂治疗失败与银屑病患者的患者报告结局较差相关。在银屑病的生物治疗中,选择预测疗效最高的生物制剂,而不是采用“阶梯式”治疗方案(该方案治疗失败的可能性更高),可能是一种更合适的策略。