Brenne Siv S, Ness-Jensen Eivind, Laugsand Eivor A
Department of Surgery, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway.
HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Forskningsveien 2, N-7600, Levanger, Norway.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr 25;39(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04629-4.
To mitigate the increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence globally and prevent CRC at the individual level, individual lifestyle information needs to be easily translated into CRC risk assessment. Several CRC risk prediction models exist and their clinical usefulness depends on their ease of use. Our objectives were to assess and externally validate the LiFeCRC score in our independent, unselected population and to investigate the use of simpler food frequency measurements in the score.
Incidental colon and rectal cancer cases were compared to the general population among 78,580 individuals participating in a longitudinal health study in Norway (HUNT). Vegetable, dairy product, processed meat and sugar/confectionary consumption was scored based on food frequency. The LiFeCRC risk score was calculated for each individual.
Over a median of 10 years following participation in HUNT, colon cancer was diagnosed in 1355 patients and rectal cancer was diagnosed in 473 patients. The LiFeCRC score using food frequencies demonstrated good discrimination in CRC overall (AUC 0.77) and in sex-specific models (AUC men 0.76 and women 0.77) in this population also including individuals ≥ 70 years and patients with diabetes. It performed somewhat better in colon (AUC 0.80) than in rectal cancer (AUC 0.72) and worked best for female colon cancer (AUC 0.81).
Readily available clinical variables and food frequency questions in a modified LiFeCRC score can identify patients at risk of CRC and may improve primary prevention by motivating to lifestyle change or participation in the CRC screening programme.
为了缓解全球结直肠癌(CRC)发病率的上升,并在个体层面预防结直肠癌,个人生活方式信息需要易于转化为CRC风险评估。现已有几种CRC风险预测模型,其临床实用性取决于易用性。我们的目标是在我们独立、未经过筛选的人群中评估并外部验证LiFeCRC评分,并研究在该评分中使用更简单的食物频率测量方法。
在挪威一项纵向健康研究(HUNT)的78580名参与者中,将偶发性结肠癌和直肠癌病例与普通人群进行比较。根据食物频率对蔬菜、乳制品、加工肉类和糖/糖果的摄入量进行评分。为每个个体计算LiFeCRC风险评分。
在参与HUNT后的中位10年期间,1355例患者被诊断为结肠癌,473例患者被诊断为直肠癌。在这个包括70岁及以上个体和糖尿病患者的人群中,使用食物频率的LiFeCRC评分在总体CRC(AUC 0.77)以及性别特异性模型(男性AUC 0.76,女性AUC 0.77)中表现出良好的区分能力。它在结肠癌(AUC 0.80)中的表现略优于直肠癌(AUC 0.72),对女性结肠癌的预测效果最佳(AUC 0.81)。
改良后的LiFeCRC评分中易于获得的临床变量和食物频率问题可以识别有CRC风险的患者,并可能通过促使生活方式改变或参与CRC筛查计划来改善一级预防。