Public Health Postgraduate Program, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Nutrition Department, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06523-x.
Gestational weight gain (GWG) is an important indicator for monitoring maternal and fetal health.
To evaluate the effect of GWG outside the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) on fetal and neonatal outcomes.
A prospective cohort study with 1642 pregnant women selected from 2017 to 2023, with gestational age ≤ 18 weeks and followed until delivery in the city of Araraquara, Southeast Brazil. The relationship between IOM-recommended GWG and fetal outcomes (abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness, arm and thigh subcutaneous tissue area and intrauterine growth restriction) and neonatal outcomes (percentage of fat mass, fat-free mass, birth weight and length, ponderal index, weight adequateness for gestational age by the Intergrowth curve, prematurity, and Apgar score) were investigated. Generalized Estimating Equations were used.
GWG below the IOM recommendations was associated with increased risks of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (aOR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.14-2.27), low birth weight (aOR 2.44; 95% CI: 1.85-3.21), and prematurity (aOR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.81-3.05), and lower chance of being Large for Gestational Age (LGA) (aOR 0.38; 95% CI: 0.28-0.54), with smaller arm subcutaneous tissue area (AST) (-7.99 g; 95% CI: -8.97 to -7.02), birth length (-0.76 cm; 95% CI: -1.03 to -0.49), and neonatal fat mass percentage (-0.85%; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.58). Conversely, exceeding GWG guidelines increased the likelihood of LGA (aOR 1.53; 95% CI: 1.20-1.96), with lower 5th-minute Apgar score (aOR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.20-0.87), and increased birth weight (90.14 g; 95% CI: 53.30 to 126.99).
Adherence to GWG recommendations is crucial, with deviations negatively impacting fetal health. Effective weight control strategies are imperative.
妊娠体重增加(GWG)是监测母婴健康的重要指标。
评估美国医学研究所(IOM)建议之外的 GWG 对胎儿和新生儿结局的影响。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了 2017 年至 2023 年期间在巴西东南部阿拉拉夸拉市选择的 1642 名妊娠年龄≤18 周并随访至分娩的孕妇。研究调查了 IOM 推荐的 GWG 与胎儿结局(腹部皮下组织厚度、手臂和大腿皮下组织面积和宫内生长受限)和新生儿结局(脂肪量百分比、无脂肪量、出生体重和长度、体重指数、按 Intergrowth 曲线评估的适合胎龄体重、早产和阿普加评分)之间的关系。使用广义估计方程进行分析。
低于 IOM 建议的 GWG 与宫内生长受限(IUGR)(aOR 1.61;95%CI:1.14-2.27)、低出生体重(aOR 2.44;95%CI:1.85-3.21)和早产(aOR 2.35;95%CI:1.81-3.05)的风险增加相关,而与巨大儿(LGA)(aOR 0.38;95%CI:0.28-0.54)的可能性降低相关,同时手臂皮下组织面积(AST)(-7.99g;95%CI:-8.97 至-7.02)、出生长度(-0.76cm;95%CI:-1.03 至-0.49)和新生儿脂肪量百分比(-0.85%;95%CI:-1.12 至-0.58)降低。相反,超过 GWG 指南会增加 LGA(aOR 1.53;95%CI:1.20-1.96)的可能性,同时 5 分钟阿普加评分(aOR 0.42;95%CI:0.20-0.87)降低,出生体重增加(90.14g;95%CI:53.30 至 126.99)。
遵循 GWG 建议至关重要,偏差会对胎儿健康产生负面影响。有效的体重控制策略是必要的。