Mathew Joanne, Mehawej Jordy, Wang Ziyue, Orwig Taylor, Ding Eric, Filippaios Andreas, Naeem Syed, Otabil Edith Mensah, Hamel Alex, Noorishirazi Kamran, Radu Irina, Saczynski Jane, McManus David D, Tran Khanh-Van
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Lake Avenue North, Worcester, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, USA.
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Mar 28;21(3):323-330. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.03.005.
Smartwatches have become readily accessible tools for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF). There remains limited data on how they affect psychosocial outcomes and engagement in older adults. We examine the health behavior outcomes of stroke survivors prescribed smartwatches for AF detection stratified by age.
We analyzed data from the Pulsewatch study, a randomized controlled trial that enrolled patients (≥ 50 years) with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 2. Intervention participants were equipped with a cardiac patch monitor and a smartwatch-app dyad, while control participants wore the cardiac patch monitor for up to 44 days. We evaluated health behavior parameters using standardized tools, including the Consumer Health Activation Index, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire, the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and wear time of participants categorized into three age groups: Group 1 (ages 50-60), Group 2 (ages 61-69), and Group 3 (ages 70-87). We performed statistical analysis using a mixed-effects repeated measures linear regression model to examine differences amongst age groups.
Comparative analysis between Groups 1, 2 and 3 revealed no significant differences in anxiety, patient activation, perception of physical health and wear time. The use of smartwatch technology was associated with a decrease in perception of mental health for Group 2 compared to Group 1 (β = -3.29, = 0.046).
Stroke survivors demonstrated a willingness to use smartwatches for AF monitoring. Importantly, among these study participants, the majority did not experience negative health behavior outcomes or decreased engagement as age increased.
智能手表已成为检测心房颤动(AF)的便捷工具。关于它们如何影响老年人的心理社会结局和参与度的数据仍然有限。我们研究了按年龄分层的、为检测房颤而配备智能手表的中风幸存者的健康行为结局。
我们分析了来自Pulsewatch研究的数据,这是一项随机对照试验,纳入了有中风或短暂性脑缺血发作病史且CHA2DS2-VASc≥2的患者(≥50岁)。干预组参与者配备了心脏贴片监测器和智能手表应用程序组合,而对照组参与者佩戴心脏贴片监测器长达44天。我们使用标准化工具评估健康行为参数,包括消费者健康激活指数、广泛性焦虑症问卷、12项简短健康调查,以及将参与者的佩戴时间分为三个年龄组:第1组(50 - 60岁)、第2组(61 - 69岁)和第3组(70 - 87岁)。我们使用混合效应重复测量线性回归模型进行统计分析,以检验年龄组之间的差异。
第1组、第2组和第3组之间的比较分析显示,在焦虑、患者激活、身体健康感知和佩戴时间方面没有显著差异。与第1组相比,第2组使用智能手表技术与心理健康感知下降有关(β = -3.29,P = 0.046)。
中风幸存者表现出使用智能手表进行房颤监测的意愿。重要的是,在这些研究参与者中,大多数人并没有随着年龄增长而出现负面的健康行为结局或参与度下降。