• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对移动医疗的态度及采用情况

Physician attitudes towards-and adoption of-mobile health.

作者信息

Kong Tracie, Scott Mary Morgan, Li Yang, Wichelman Cynthia

机构信息

Fourth year medical students, Washington University School of Medicine, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2020 Feb 20;6:2055207620907187. doi: 10.1177/2055207620907187. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2055207620907187
PMID:32128235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7036486/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Smartphone apps and mobile devices are an emerging method of healthcare data collection. This study sought to understand how physicians currently view mobile health (mHealth) technologies and use them in patient care.

METHODS

A total of 186 physicians affiliated with Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, USA completed a survey in 2016 regarding their current implementation of mHealth technologies for patient care and support for further development.

RESULTS

More than half of respondents were willing to discuss health apps and mobile devices with patients. However, most were not currently recommending them to patients. Apps/devices that encouraged a healthy diet and weight or tracked heart rate received the highest satisfaction ratings. Apps/devices that accessed the EMR (electronic medical record) remotely, provided medication reminders, or enrolled research subjects garnered the most interest despite respondents lacking prior experience. A majority agreed that collected biometrics are useful for promoting a healthy lifestyle (68%), tracking medical treatment (64%), or conducting research (56%); and agreed that proof of accuracy and precision (81%) and the efficient integration of collected data (68%) are necessary improvements. Uploading data automatically and updating physicians in real-time was the most preferred method of data integration into the EMR.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians show interest in using mHealth technologies for patient care but have limited experience, usually with those specific to their specialties. Proof of quality and a method to integrate data into the EMR are necessary for a mainstream role in healthcare.

摘要

目的

智能手机应用程序和移动设备是一种新兴的医疗数据收集方法。本研究旨在了解医生目前如何看待移动健康(mHealth)技术以及他们在患者护理中如何使用这些技术。

方法

2016年,美国密苏里州圣路易斯华盛顿大学医学院附属的186名医生完成了一项关于他们目前在患者护理中实施mHealth技术以及对进一步发展的支持的调查。

结果

超过一半的受访者愿意与患者讨论健康应用程序和移动设备。然而,目前大多数人并没有向患者推荐这些应用程序和设备。鼓励健康饮食和控制体重或追踪心率的应用程序/设备获得了最高的满意度评分。尽管受访者缺乏相关经验,但能够远程访问电子病历(EMR)、提供用药提醒或招募研究对象的应用程序/设备引起了他们最大的兴趣。大多数人同意收集的生物特征数据有助于促进健康的生活方式(68%)、跟踪医疗治疗(64%)或进行研究(56%);并且同意提高准确性和精确性的证明(81%)以及所收集数据的有效整合(68%)是必要的改进。自动上传数据并实时更新医生是将数据整合到EMR中最受欢迎的方法。

结论

医生对使用mHealth技术进行患者护理表现出兴趣,但经验有限,通常仅限于他们专业领域内的特定技术。质量证明以及将数据整合到EMR中的方法对于在医疗保健中发挥主流作用是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8747/7036486/f613e910cb7c/10.1177_2055207620907187-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8747/7036486/f613e910cb7c/10.1177_2055207620907187-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8747/7036486/f613e910cb7c/10.1177_2055207620907187-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Physician attitudes towards-and adoption of-mobile health.医生对移动医疗的态度及采用情况
Digit Health. 2020 Feb 20;6:2055207620907187. doi: 10.1177/2055207620907187. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Adoption of Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety: Cross-Sectional Survey Study on Patient Interest and Barriers to Engagement.抑郁症和焦虑症移动应用程序的采用情况:关于患者兴趣和参与障碍的横断面调查研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jan 25;6(1):e11334. doi: 10.2196/11334.
3
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator mHealth App for Physician Referrals and eHealth Education: ICD-TEACH Pilot Study.用于医生转诊和电子健康教育的植入式心脏复律除颤器移动健康应用程序:ICD-TEACH试点研究
JMIR Cardio. 2018 Nov 5;2(2):e10499. doi: 10.2196/10499.
4
Asynchronous mHealth Interventions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Systematic Scoping Review.类风湿关节炎的异步移动医疗干预措施:系统范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 5;8(11):e19260. doi: 10.2196/19260.
5
Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.加拿大老年人与普通成年人群体使用移动健康技术进行自我追踪的比较:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718.
6
Smartphone ownership and perspectives on health apps among a vulnerable population in East Harlem, New York.纽约东哈莱姆区弱势群体的智能手机拥有情况及对健康应用程序的看法
Mhealth. 2018 Aug 8;4:31. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.07.02. eCollection 2018.
7
Smartphone Ownership and Interest in Mobile Health Technologies for Self-care Among Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Cross-sectional Survey Study.慢性心力衰竭患者的智能手机拥有情况及对用于自我护理的移动健康技术的兴趣:横断面调查研究
JMIR Cardio. 2022 Jan 14;6(1):e31982. doi: 10.2196/31982.
8
Mobile Health Usage, Preferences, Barriers, and eHealth Literacy in Rheumatology: Patient Survey Study.移动医疗的使用、偏好、障碍和风湿病患者的电子健康素养:患者调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 12;8(8):e19661. doi: 10.2196/19661.
9
Smartphone Ownership, Smartphone Utilization, and Interest in Using Mental Health Apps to Address Substance Use Disorders: Literature Review and Cross-sectional Survey Study Across Two Sites.智能手机拥有情况、智能手机使用情况以及使用心理健康应用程序来解决物质使用障碍的兴趣:文献综述与跨两个地点的横断面调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 7;6(7):e38684. doi: 10.2196/38684.
10
A Questionnaire for Assessing User Satisfaction With Mobile Health Apps: Development Using Rasch Measurement Theory.使用 Rasch 测量理论开发的用于评估用户对移动健康应用满意度的问卷
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 26;8(5):e15909. doi: 10.2196/15909.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring primary care doctors' perceptions and experiences in adopting mHealth with patients: A qualitative study.探索基层医疗医生在与患者采用移动健康技术方面的认知与经验:一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 2;11:20552076251347850. doi: 10.1177/20552076251347850. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Attitudes of healthcare professionals and researchers toward wearable and app derived patient generated health data.医疗保健专业人员和研究人员对可穿戴设备及应用程序衍生的患者生成健康数据的态度。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 30;8(1):186. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01568-4.
3
Acceptability of digital health interventions in perioperative care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of clinician perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital medicine, on its way to being just plain medicine.数字医学正在成为普通医学。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Jan 15;1:20175. doi: 10.1038/s41746-017-0005-1. eCollection 2018.
2
Population measurement for health systems.卫生系统的人群测量
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Jan 15;1:20174. doi: 10.1038/s41746-017-0004-2. eCollection 2018.
3
NIH support of mobile, imaging, pervasive sensing, social media and location tracking (MISST) research: laying the foundation to examine research ethics in the digital age.美国国立卫生研究院对移动、成像、普适传感、社交媒体和位置跟踪(MISST)研究的支持:为审视数字时代的研究伦理奠定基础。
围手术期护理中数字健康干预措施的可接受性:临床医生观点的系统评价与叙述性综合分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 15;15(3):e086412. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086412.
4
Effectiveness of Mobile Health Intervention in Medication Adherence: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.移动健康干预对药物依从性的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Syst. 2025 Jan 17;49(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02135-2.
5
A novel smartphone application for bladder cancer management (BCM App): Design, development, and usability evaluation.一种用于膀胱癌管理的新型智能手机应用程序(BCM应用程序):设计、开发及可用性评估。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Oct 28;13:375. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_796_23. eCollection 2024.
6
Clinical Use of Mental Health Digital Therapeutics in a Large Health Care Delivery System: Retrospective Patient Cohort Study and Provider Survey.大型医疗保健服务系统中精神健康数字疗法的临床应用:回顾性患者队列研究与提供者调查
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Oct 2;11:e56574. doi: 10.2196/56574.
7
Perspectives on Creating a Chronic Pain Support Line in Portugal: Results of a Focus Group Study among Patients and Healthcare Professionals.关于在葡萄牙创建慢性疼痛支持热线的观点:患者与医疗保健专业人员焦点小组研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 2;13(17):5207. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175207.
8
Preferences of people with chronic kidney disease regarding digital health interventions that promote healthy lifestyle: qualitative systematic review with meta-ethnography.慢性肾脏病患者对促进健康生活方式的数字健康干预措施的偏好:定性系统评价与荟萃民族学。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 27;14(5):e082345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082345.
9
Physician perspectives of the community paramedicine at clinic (CP@clinic) and my care plan app (myCP app) for older adults.医师对诊所社区医疗员 (CP@clinic) 和我的老年人关怀计划应用程序 (myCP app) 的看法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 25;25(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02436-y.
10
A mixed methods analysis of existing assessment and evaluation tools (AETs) for mental health applications.混合方法分析现有的心理健康应用评估和评价工具(AETs)。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 7;12:1196491. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1196491. eCollection 2024.
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Jan 15;1:20171. doi: 10.1038/s41746-017-0001-5. eCollection 2018.
4
Health intelligence: how artificial intelligence transforms population and personalized health.健康智能:人工智能如何改变群体与个性化健康。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Oct 2;1:53. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0058-9. eCollection 2018.
5
Agile research to complement agile development: a proposal for an mHealth research lifecycle.敏捷研究以补充敏捷开发:移动健康研究生命周期的一项提议。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Sep 13;1:46. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0053-1. eCollection 2018.
6
Prescribable mHealth apps identified from an overview of systematic reviews.从系统评价综述中识别出的可开具处方的移动健康应用程序。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 9;1:12. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0021-9. eCollection 2018.
7
Developing and adopting safe and effective digital biomarkers to improve patient outcomes.开发并采用安全有效的数字生物标志物以改善患者治疗效果。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2(1). doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0090-4. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
8
Evaluating healthcare practitioners' views on store-and-forward teledermoscopy services for the diagnosis of skin cancer.评估医疗从业者对用于皮肤癌诊断的存储转发式远程皮肤镜检查服务的看法。
Digit Health. 2019 Feb 6;5:2055207619828225. doi: 10.1177/2055207619828225. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
9
Health Apps and Health Policy: What Is Needed?健康应用程序与健康政策:需要什么?
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):1975-1976. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14378.
10
FDA Regulation of Mobile Medical Apps.美国食品药品监督管理局对移动医疗应用程序的监管
JAMA. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):337-338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8832.