Suppr超能文献

人工智能模型从X光片识别和分类牙种植体固定装置的准确性:一项系统评价。

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models in Dental Implant Fixture Identification and Classification from Radiographs: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Ibraheem Wael I

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 11;14(8):806. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14080806.

Abstract

: The availability of multiple dental implant systems makes it difficult for the treating dentist to identify and classify the implant in case of inaccessibility or loss of previous records. Artificial intelligence (AI) is reported to have a high success rate in medical image classification and is effectively used in this area. Studies have reported improved implant classification and identification accuracy when AI is used with trained dental professionals. This systematic review aims to analyze various studies discussing the accuracy of AI tools in implant identification and classification. : The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The focused PICO question for the current study was "What is the accuracy (outcome) of artificial intelligence tools (Intervention) in detecting and/or classifying the type of dental implant (Participant/population) using X-ray images?" Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE-PubMed, and Cochrane were searched systematically to collect the relevant published literature. The search strings were based on the formulated PICO question. The article search was conducted in January 2024 using the Boolean operators and truncation. The search was limited to articles published in English in the last 15 years (January 2008 to December 2023). The quality of all the selected articles was critically analyzed using the Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Tool (QUADAS-2). : Twenty-one articles were selected for qualitative analysis based on predetermined selection criteria. Study characteristics were tabulated in a self-designed table. Out of the 21 studies evaluated, 14 were found to be at risk of bias, with high or unclear risk in one or more domains. The remaining seven studies, however, had a low risk of bias. The overall accuracy of AI models in implant detection and identification ranged from a low of 67% to as high as 98.5%. Most included studies reported mean accuracy levels above 90%. : The articles in the present review provide considerable evidence to validate that AI tools have high accuracy in identifying and classifying dental implant systems using 2-dimensional X-ray images. These outcomes are vital for clinical diagnosis and treatment planning by trained dental professionals to enhance patient treatment outcomes.

摘要

多种牙科种植系统的存在使得在无法获取或丢失先前记录的情况下,治疗牙医难以识别和分类种植体。据报道,人工智能(AI)在医学图像分类方面成功率很高,并在该领域得到有效应用。研究表明,当AI与训练有素的牙科专业人员配合使用时,种植体分类和识别的准确性有所提高。本系统评价旨在分析各种讨论AI工具在种植体识别和分类准确性的研究。

遵循了系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,并在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中注册了该研究。本研究重点关注的PICO问题是“使用X线图像,人工智能工具(干预措施)在检测和/或分类牙科种植体类型(参与者/人群)方面的准确性(结果)如何?”系统检索了Web of Science、Scopus、MEDLINE-PubMed和Cochrane数据库,以收集相关的已发表文献。检索词基于拟定的PICO问题。2024年1月使用布尔运算符和截断法进行文章检索。检索仅限于过去15年(2008年1月至2023年12月)以英文发表的文章。使用质量评估和诊断准确性工具(QUADAS-2)对所有入选文章的质量进行了严格分析。

根据预先确定的选择标准,选择了21篇文章进行定性分析。研究特征被列入自行设计的表格中。在评估的21项研究中,有14项被发现存在偏倚风险,在一个或多个领域存在高或不清楚的风险。然而,其余7项研究的偏倚风险较低。AI模型在种植体检测和识别方面的总体准确率从低至67%到高达98.5%不等。大多数纳入研究报告的平均准确率水平高于90%。

本综述中的文章提供了大量证据,证实AI工具在使用二维X线图像识别和分类牙科种植系统方面具有很高的准确性。这些结果对于训练有素的牙科专业人员进行临床诊断和治疗计划以提高患者治疗效果至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de34/11049199/1e4cb405c32d/diagnostics-14-00806-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验