Tam Chung-Kit, Chang Yu-Hua, Tan Kok-Hwa
Department of Kinesiology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 300035, Taiwan.
Physical Education Office, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 300044, Taiwan.
Sports (Basel). 2024 Mar 22;12(4):86. doi: 10.3390/sports12040086.
This study aimed to investigate how single-bout open-skill exercise (OSE), closed-skill exercise (CSE), and mixed-skill exercise intervention (MSE) influence executive function.
A total of 120 students aged between 18 and 25 were separated into three groups: closed-skill exercise, open-skill exercise, and mixed-skill exercise. A task-switching test was performed before and after a single bout of exercise intervention. The simple reaction time, choice reaction time, switch cost, and correction rate were tested in a task-switching test. The results were analyzed via a two-way analysis of variance, with a significance level of α = 0.05, to compare the effects of the intervention.
Only open-skill exercise exhibited a significant effect on the simple reaction time ( < 0.05). In terms of choice reaction time and switch cost, all three intervention groups exhibited significant improvements, with no significant differences observed between the three groups ( < 0.05). The correction rate did not show a significant effect post-intervention, and no significant differences were observed between the groups. The correction rate showed no significant effect after the intervention or between groups.
All three types of exercise can shorten choice reaction time and switch cost, but only OSE can reduce simple reaction time.
本研究旨在探讨单次开放性技能运动(OSE)、封闭性技能运动(CSE)和混合性技能运动干预(MSE)如何影响执行功能。
将120名年龄在18至25岁之间的学生分为三组:封闭性技能运动组、开放性技能运动组和混合性技能运动组。在单次运动干预前后进行任务转换测试。在任务转换测试中测试简单反应时间、选择反应时间、转换成本和正确率。通过双向方差分析对结果进行分析,显著性水平α = 0.05,以比较干预效果。
仅开放性技能运动对简单反应时间有显著影响(<0.05)。在选择反应时间和转换成本方面,所有三个干预组均表现出显著改善,三组之间未观察到显著差异(<0.05)。干预后正确率未显示出显著影响,组间也未观察到显著差异。干预后或组间正确率均未显示出显著影响。
所有三种类型的运动都可以缩短选择反应时间和转换成本,但只有OSE可以缩短简单反应时间。