Suppr超能文献

利用肌肉氧饱和度数据计算负荷和强度。

Calculating Load and Intensity Using Muscle Oxygen Saturation Data.

作者信息

Vasquez-Bonilla Aldo, Yáñez-Sepúlveda Rodrigo, Gómez-Carmona Carlos D, Olcina Guillermo, Olivares-Arancibia Jorge, Rojas-Valverde Daniel

机构信息

Grupo de Avances en Entrenamiento Deportivo y Acondicionamiento Físico, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain.

Faculty Education and Social Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2024 Apr 22;12(4):113. doi: 10.3390/sports12040113.

Abstract

The study aimed to calculate training intensity and load using muscle oxygen saturation (SmO) during two differentiated physical tasks. 29 university athletes participated in a 40-m Maximal Shuttle Run Test (MST, 10 × 40-m with 30 s recovery between sprints) and a 3000-m time trial run. Distance and time were used to calculate external load (EL). Internal load indicators were calculated based on percentage of maximum heart rate (%HR) and SmO variables: muscle oxygen extraction (∇%SmO) and the cardio-muscle oxygen index (CMOI) was also provided by relating ∇%SmO2 ÷ %HR, and the training load were calculated as the product of speed (m/min × IL) and the efficiency index [Eff (m/min ÷ IL)]. A student t test was applied based on Bayesian factor analysis. As expected, EL differed in the 40-m MST (331 ± 22.8) vs. 3000-m trials (222 ± 56.8) [BF = 6.25e; = <0.001]. Likewise, IL showed higher values in 40-m MST (39.20 ± 15.44) vs. 3000-m (30.51 ± 8.67) in CMOI: [BF = 1.70; = 0.039]. Training load was greater in 40-m MST (85.77 ± 27.40) vs. 3000-m (15.55 ± 6.77) [(m/min × ∇%SmO): BF = 12.5; = 0.003] and 40-m MST (129.27 ± 49.44) vs. 3000-m (70.63 ± 32.98) [(m/min × CMOI): BF = 169.6; = <0.001]. Also, the Eff was higher in 40-m MST (10.19 ± 4.17) vs. 3000-m (6.06 ± 2.21) [(m/min × ∇%SmO): BF = 137.03; = <0.001] and 40-m MST (9.69 ± 4.11) vs. 3000-m (7.55 ± 1.87) [(m/min × CMOI): BF = 1.86; = 0.035]. This study demonstrates calculations of training intensity and load based on SmO as an internal load indicator along with speed as an external load indicator during two differentiated exercises.

摘要

该研究旨在计算在两项不同体育任务期间使用肌肉氧饱和度(SmO)的训练强度和负荷。29名大学运动员参加了40米最大穿梭跑测试(MST,10×40米,冲刺之间恢复30秒)和3000米计时跑。距离和时间用于计算外部负荷(EL)。内部负荷指标基于最大心率百分比(%HR)和SmO变量进行计算:还通过关联∇%SmO2÷%HR提供了肌肉氧摄取(∇%SmO)和心肌氧指数(CMOI),并且训练负荷计算为速度(米/分钟×IL)与效率指数[Eff(米/分钟÷IL)]的乘积。基于贝叶斯因子分析应用了学生t检验。正如预期的那样,40米MST(331±22.8)与3000米测试(222±56.8)中的EL有所不同[BF = 6.25e;P = <0.001]。同样,在CMOI方面,40米MST(39.20±15.44)中的IL值高于3000米(30.51±8.67):[BF = 1.70;P = 0.039]。40米MST(85.77±27.40)与3000米(15.55±6.77)相比,训练负荷更大[(米/分钟×∇%SmO):BF = 12.5;P = 0.003],40米MST(129.27±49.44)与3000米(70.63±32.98)相比也是如此[(米/分钟×CMOI):BF = 169.6;P = <0.001]。此外,40米MST(10.19±4.17)与3000米(6.06±2.21)相比,Eff更高[(米/分钟×∇%SmO):BF = 137.03;P = <0.001],40米MST(9.69±4.11)与3000米(7.55±1.87)相比也是如此[(米/分钟×CMOI):BF = 1.86;P = 0.035]。本研究展示了在两项不同运动期间基于SmO作为内部负荷指标以及速度作为外部负荷指标对训练强度和负荷的计算。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a05/11054888/b50bd41c6064/sports-12-00113-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验