• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对居家和机构康复治疗的偏好。

Preferences for Postacute Care at Home vs Facilities.

机构信息

Harvard University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240678. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0678.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0678
PMID:38669031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11065156/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Two in 5 US hospital stays result in rehabilitative postacute care, typically through skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or home health agencies (HHAs). However, a lack of clear guidelines and understanding of patient and caregiver preferences make it challenging to promote high-value patient-centered care.

OBJECTIVE

To assess preferences and willingness to pay for facility-based vs home-based postacute care among patients and caregivers, considering demographic variations.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In September 2022, a nationally representative survey was conducted with participants 45 years or older. Using a discrete choice experiment, participants acting as patients or caregivers chose between facility-based and home-based postacute care that best met their preferences, needs, and family conditions. Survey weights were applied to generate nationally representative estimates.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Preferences and willingness to pay for various attributes of postacute care settings were assessed, examining variation based on demographic factors, socioeconomic status, job security, and previous care experiences.

RESULTS

A total of 2077 adults were invited to participate in the survey; 1555 (74.9%) completed the survey. In the weighted sample, 52.9% of participants were women, 6.5% were Asian or Pacific Islander, 1.7% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 11.2% were Black or African American, 78.4% were White; the mean (SD) age was 62.6 (9.6) years; and there was a survey completion rate of 74.9%. Patients and caregivers showed a substantial willingness to pay for home-based and high-quality care. Patients and caregivers were willing to pay an additional $58.08 per day (95% CI, 45.32-70.83) and $45.54 per day (95% CI, 31.09-59.99) for HHA care compared with a shared SNF room, respectively. However, increased demands on caregiver time within an HHA scenario and socioeconomic challenges, such as insecure employment, shifted caregivers' preferences toward facility-based care. There was a strong aversion to below average quality. To avoid below average SNF care, patients and caregivers were willing to pay $75.21 per day (95% CI, 61.68-88.75) and $79.10 per day (95% CI, 63.29-94.91) compared with average-quality care, respectively. Additionally, prior awareness and experience with postacute care was associated with willingness to pay for home-based care. No differences in preferences among patients and caregivers based on race, educational background, urban or rural residence, general health status, or housing type were observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this survey study underscore a prevailing preference for home-based postacute care, aligning with current policy trends. However, attention is warranted for disadvantaged groups who are potentially overlooked during the shift toward home-based care, particularly those facing caregiver constraints and socioeconomic hardships. Ensuring equitable support and improved quality measure tools are crucial for promoting patient-centric postacute care, with emphasis on addressing the needs of marginalized groups.

摘要

重要性

在美国,有五分之二的住院患者需要接受康复性的急性后期护理,通常是通过熟练护理设施(SNFs)或家庭保健机构(HHAs)来实现。然而,由于缺乏明确的指导方针和对患者及照护者偏好的理解,因此难以促进以患者为中心的高价值医疗服务。

目的

评估患者和照护者对基于设施和基于家庭的急性后期护理的偏好和支付意愿,并考虑人口统计学差异。

设计、地点和参与者:在 2022 年 9 月,对 45 岁或以上的人群进行了一项全国代表性的调查。使用离散选择实验,参与者作为患者或照护者在最能满足其偏好、需求和家庭条件的基于设施和基于家庭的急性后期护理之间进行选择。调查权重被应用于生成全国代表性的估计值。

主要结果和措施

评估了急性后期护理环境的各种属性的偏好和支付意愿,考察了基于人口统计学因素、社会经济地位、工作保障和以前的护理经验的变化。

结果

共邀请了 2077 名成年人参与调查;1555 人(74.9%)完成了调查。在加权样本中,52.9%的参与者为女性,6.5%为亚裔或太平洋岛民,1.7%为美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民,11.2%为黑人或非裔美国人,78.4%为白人;平均(SD)年龄为 62.6(9.6)岁;调查完成率为 74.9%。患者和照护者表现出对家庭护理和高质量护理的强烈支付意愿。与共享 SNF 房间相比,患者和照护者分别愿意每天多支付 58.08 美元(95%CI,45.32-70.83)和 45.54 美元(95%CI,31.09-59.99)用于 HHA 护理。然而,HHA 场景中对照护者时间的需求增加以及就业不稳定等社会经济挑战,使照护者更倾向于选择基于设施的护理。患者和照护者强烈反对低于平均水平的服务质量。为了避免低于平均水平的 SNF 护理,患者和照护者愿意每天多支付 75.21 美元(95%CI,61.68-88.75)和 79.10 美元(95%CI,63.29-94.91)用于接受高质量护理。此外,对急性后期护理的事先了解和经验与支付家庭护理的意愿有关。没有观察到患者和照护者之间基于种族、教育背景、城市或农村居住、总体健康状况或住房类型的偏好差异。

结论和相关性

这项调查研究的结果强调了对家庭为基础的急性后期护理的普遍偏好,这与当前的政策趋势一致。然而,需要关注那些在向家庭为基础的护理转变过程中可能被忽视的弱势群体,特别是那些面临照护者限制和社会经济困难的群体。确保为以患者为中心的急性后期护理提供公平的支持和改进的质量衡量工具至关重要,重点是解决边缘化群体的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c706/11065156/cd70e6d8dc41/jamahealthforum-e240678-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c706/11065156/4323e90fb07c/jamahealthforum-e240678-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c706/11065156/a1b190f71cec/jamahealthforum-e240678-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c706/11065156/cd70e6d8dc41/jamahealthforum-e240678-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c706/11065156/4323e90fb07c/jamahealthforum-e240678-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c706/11065156/a1b190f71cec/jamahealthforum-e240678-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c706/11065156/cd70e6d8dc41/jamahealthforum-e240678-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Preferences for Postacute Care at Home vs Facilities.患者对居家和机构康复治疗的偏好。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240678. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0678.
2
Patient Outcomes After Hospital Discharge to Home With Home Health Care vs to a Skilled Nursing Facility.患者出院后居家接受家庭保健护理与入住专业护理机构的结局比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):617-623. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7998.
3
Assessment of Rural-Urban Differences in Postacute Care Utilization and Outcomes Among Older US Adults.评估美国老年人在康复期护理的城乡利用差异和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918738. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18738.
4
Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program.医疗保险共同节约计划中急性后期护理的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):518-526. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115.
5
Comparison of Functional Status Improvements Among Patients With Stroke Receiving Postacute Care in Inpatient Rehabilitation vs Skilled Nursing Facilities.比较在住院康复和熟练护理设施中接受急性后期护理的中风患者的功能状态改善情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1916646. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16646.
6
A Postacute Care Function Process Quality Measure for the Collection of Standardized Self-Care and Mobility Data: Development, Implementation, and Quality Measure Scores.用于收集标准化自我护理和活动能力数据的康复护理功能流程质量测量指标:制定、实施和质量测量得分。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun;103(6):1061-1069. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.148. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
7
The Five-Star Skilled Nursing Facility Rating System and Care of Disadvantaged Populations.五星熟练护理设施评级系统与弱势群体护理。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jan;67(1):108-114. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15629. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
8
Determinants of postacute care discharge destination after dysvascular lower limb amputation.血管性下肢截肢后急性后期护理出院去向的决定因素。
PM R. 2011 Apr;3(4):336-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.12.019.
9
Cognitive Biases Influence Decision-Making Regarding Postacute Care in a Skilled Nursing Facility.认知偏差影响了在熟练护理设施中进行康复护理的决策。
J Hosp Med. 2020 Jan 1;15(1):22-27. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3273. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
10
Prevalence and Correlates of Unstable Housing Among US Children.美国儿童中不稳定住房的流行率及相关因素。
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jul 1;178(7):707-717. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.1159.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Derived Design Principles for Technology-Enabled Healing at Home Following Hospital Discharge: Mixed Methods Study.出院后在家中借助技术实现康复的患者衍生设计原则:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 20;12:e72913. doi: 10.2196/72913.
2
Specialization of Home Health Agencies to Deliver Care for Medicare Advantage Patients.居家健康机构专门为医疗保险优势计划患者提供护理服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525336. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25336.
3
Association of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) With Days at Home Among Medicare Beneficiaries After a Heart Failure Hospitalization.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased Medicare Advantage Penetration Is Associated With Lower Postacute Care Use For Traditional Medicare Patients.医疗保险优势计划参保率的提高与传统医疗保险患者较低的急性后期护理使用率相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Apr;42(4):488-497. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00994.
2
Informal Caregivers Provide Considerable Front-Line Support In Residential Care Facilities And Nursing Homes.非正式护工在养老院和护理院提供了相当多的一线支持。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jan;41(1):105-111. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01239.
3
Trends in Post-Acute Care Utilization During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
心力衰竭住院后,阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)与医疗保险受益人的居家天数之间的关联。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Jun;18(6):e011246. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011246. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
4
Prior authorization and utilization management for post-acute home health in Medicare Advantage: the motivations, players, processes, unique challenges, and impacts on patient care.医疗保险优势计划中急性后期家庭健康护理的事先授权与利用管理:动机、参与者、流程、独特挑战及对患者护理的影响
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Feb 4;3(3):qxaf020. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf020. eCollection 2025 Mar.
新冠疫情期间的康复治疗利用趋势。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Dec;22(12):2496-2499. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
4
What Is The Value Of A Star When Choosing A Provider For Total Joint Replacement? A Discrete Choice Experiment.选择全膝关节置换术供应商时,星级的价值是什么?一项离散选择实验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Jan;40(1):138-145. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00085.
5
Secret Shopper Data on Private Prices in the Nursing Home Industry From 2008 to 2010.2008 年至 2010 年私人养老院行业的秘密购物者数据。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Aug;78(4):449-457. doi: 10.1177/1077558719879022. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Postacute Care - The Piggy Bank for Savings in Alternative Payment Models?急性后期护理——替代支付模式中的储蓄存钱罐?
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):302-303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1901896.
7
Simplifying The Medicare Plan Finder Tool Could Help Older Adults Choose Lower-Cost Part D Plans.简化医疗保险计划选择工具可以帮助老年人选择更低成本的 Part D 计划。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Aug;37(8):1290-1297. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0145.
8
Selecting a Skilled Nursing Facility for Postacute Care: Individual and Family Perspectives.为急性后期护理选择专业护理机构:个人及家庭视角
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Nov;65(11):2459-2465. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14988. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
9
Less Intense Postacute Care, Better Outcomes For Enrollees In Medicare Advantage Than Those In Fee-For-Service.与按服务收费模式的参保者相比,医疗保险优势计划的参保者接受强度较低的急性后期护理时,治疗效果更佳。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jan 1;36(1):91-100. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1027.
10
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.