Bostedt Dana, Dogan Ebrar Hümeyra, Benker Sina Chole, Rasmus Maret Antje, Eisner Emily, Simon Nadine Lana, Schmitz Martina, Missler Markus, Darici Dogus
Medical faculty, Universität Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Institut für Anatomie und Vaskuläre Biologie, Universität Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05451-w.
Interprofessionalism is considered a key component in modern health profession education. Nevertheless, there remains ongoing debate about when and where to introduce interprofessional trainings in the curriculum. We identified anatomy, a subject commonly shared among health professionals, as a practical choice for initiating early intergroup-contact between first-year medical and midwifery students. Our study examined the effects of a four-hour block course in anatomy on interprofessional socialization and valuing, as well as long-term effects on intergroup contact.
Based on different concepts and theories of learning, we implemented 12 interprofessional learning stations. Several measures were taken to foster group cohesion: (1) self-directed working in interprofessional tandems on authentic obstetric tasks, (2) competing with other tandems, (3) creating positive interdependencies during task completion, and (4) allowing room for networking. In a pre-post design with a three-month follow-up, we assessed the outcomes of this ultra-brief training with qualitative essays and quantitative scales.
After training, both groups improved in interprofessionalism scores with strong effect sizes, mean difference in ISVS-21 = 0.303 [95% CI: 0.120, 0.487], P < .001, η² = 0.171, while the scales measuring uniprofessional identity were unaffected, mean difference in MCPIS = 0.033 [95% CI: -0.236, 0.249], P = .789. A follow-up indicated that these positive short-term effects on the ISVS-21 scale diminished after 12 weeks to baseline levels, yet, positive intergroup contact was still reported. The qualitative findings revealed that, at this initial stage of their professional identity development, both medical and midwifery students considered interprofessionalism, teamwork and social competencies to be of importance for their future careers.
This study advocates for an early implementation of interprofessional learning objectives in anatomical curricula. Young health profession students are receptive to interprofessional collaboration at this initial stage of their professional identity and derive strong advantages from a concise training approach. Yet, maintaining these gains over time may require ongoing support and reinforcement, such as through longitudinal curricula. We believe that an interprofessional socialization at an early stage can help break down barriers, and help to avoid conflicts that may arise during traditional monoprofessional curricula.
跨专业合作被视为现代卫生专业教育的关键组成部分。然而,关于在课程中何时何地引入跨专业培训仍存在持续的争论。我们确定解剖学作为卫生专业人员共同学习的一门学科,是一年级医学生和助产专业学生之间开展早期群体间接触的一个切实可行的选择。我们的研究考察了一门四小时解剖学短期课程对跨专业社会化和重视程度的影响,以及对群体间接触的长期影响。
基于不同的学习概念和理论,我们设置了12个跨专业学习站。采取了多项措施来促进团队凝聚力:(1)跨专业两人小组自主完成真实的产科任务,(2)与其他小组竞争,(3)在任务完成过程中建立积极的相互依存关系,(4)留出社交空间。在一项具有三个月随访的前后测设计中,我们通过定性短文和定量量表评估了这一超短培训的效果。
培训后,两组的跨专业合作得分均有显著提高,效应量较大,ISVS - 21的平均差异为0.303 [95%置信区间:0.120, 0.487],P <.001,η² = 0.171,而衡量单一专业身份的量表未受影响,MCPIS的平均差异为0.033 [95%置信区间:-0.236, 0.249],P =.789。一项随访表明,这些对ISVS - 21量表的积极短期影响在12周后降至基线水平,但仍有积极的群体间接触报告。定性研究结果显示,在其专业身份发展的初始阶段,医学生和助产专业学生都认为跨专业合作、团队合作和社交能力对他们未来的职业很重要。
本研究主张在解剖学课程中尽早实施跨专业学习目标。年轻的卫生专业学生在其专业身份发展的初始阶段接受跨专业合作,并且从简洁的培训方法中获得显著益处。然而,随着时间的推移保持这些收获可能需要持续的支持和强化,例如通过纵向课程。我们认为早期的跨专业社会化有助于打破障碍,并有助于避免传统单一专业课程中可能出现的冲突。