Gosse Georgia, Kumar Saravana, Banwell Helen, Moran Anna
Innovation Implementation and Clinical Translation, Allied Health and Human Performance Unit, University of South Australia, North Tce, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Department of Rural Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Graham St Shepparton, Melbourne, VIC 3630, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 19;21(4):507. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040507.
Access to appropriate healthcare is essential for children's healthy development. This is lacking in rural and remote areas, impacting health outcomes. Despite efforts to improve access for these communities, to date, no review has systematically mapped the literature on allied health models of care for children with developmental needs. This scoping review seeks to address this knowledge gap.
Adhering to the PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, a systematic search was conducted. A total of 8 databases (from inception to May 2023) and 106 grey literature sources were searched. Two reviewers independently undertook a two-stage screening process. Data were extracted using customised tools and narratively synthesised utilising the Institute of Medicine's quality domains. This review is registered a priori via Open Science Framework.
Twenty-five citations were identified within the literature. Varied models of care were reported from five mostly Western countries. Models of care identified in these areas were classified as screening services, role substitution, consultative services, or online-based services. Positive impacts on quality of healthcare were reported across all quality domains (apart from safety) with the domain of effectiveness being the most commonly reported.
Multiple models of care are currently in operation for children with developmental needs in rural and remote areas and appear to improve the quality of care. Due to complexities within, and limitations of, the evidence base, it is unclear if one model of care is superior to another. This review provides a basis for further research to explore why some models may be more effective than others.
获得适当的医疗保健对儿童的健康发展至关重要。农村和偏远地区缺乏这种保健服务,影响了健康结果。尽管已努力改善这些社区获得医疗保健的机会,但迄今为止,尚无综述系统地梳理有关为有发育需求儿童提供的联合健康护理模式的文献。本范围综述旨在填补这一知识空白。
遵循PRISMA-ScR和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指南进行系统检索。共检索了8个数据库(从创建到2023年5月)和106个灰色文献来源。两名评审员独立进行两阶段筛选过程。使用定制工具提取数据,并利用医学研究所的质量领域进行叙述性综合分析。本综述通过开放科学框架进行了预先注册。
文献中确定了25篇引文。报告了来自五个主要西方国家的不同护理模式。在这些领域确定的护理模式分为筛查服务、角色替代、咨询服务或基于网络的服务。除安全性外,所有质量领域(除安全性外)均报告了对医疗保健质量的积极影响,其中有效性领域是最常报告的。
目前,农村和偏远地区有发育需求的儿童存在多种护理模式,并且似乎提高了护理质量。由于证据基础的复杂性和局限性,尚不清楚一种护理模式是否优于另一种。本综述为进一步研究探索为何某些模式可能比其他模式更有效提供了基础。