Suppr超能文献

评估竖脊肌平面阻滞作为正中开胸非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术中心脏麻醉辅助方法的疗效:一项随机临床试验。

Evaluating the Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block as a Supplementary Approach to Cardiac Anesthesia during Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery via Median Sternotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Kim Sujin, Song Seung Woo, Jeon Yeong-Gwan, Song Sang A, Hong Soonchang, Park Ji-Hyoung

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 26426, Republic of Korea.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 26426, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 11;13(8):2208. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082208.

Abstract

Pain control after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) facilitates mobilization and improves outcomes. The efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) after cardiac surgery remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the analgesic effects of ESPB after OPCAB. Precisely 56 patients receiving OPCAB were randomly divided into ESPB and control groups. The primary outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the dose of rescue analgesics in terms of oral morphine milligram equivalents, the dose of antiemetics, the length of intubation time, and the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). The VAS scores were similar at all time points in both groups. The incidence of severe pain (VAS score > 7) was significantly lower in the ESPB group (50% vs. 15.4%; = 0.008). The dose of rescue analgesics was also lower in the ESPB group (19.04 ± 18.76, 9.83 ± 12.84, = 0.044) compared with the control group. The other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. ESPB provides analgesic efficacy by reducing the incidence of severe pain and opioid use after OPCAB.

摘要

非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)后的疼痛控制有助于患者活动并改善预后。心脏手术后竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)的疗效仍存在争议。我们旨在研究OPCAB后ESPB的镇痛效果。确切地说,56例行OPCAB的患者被随机分为ESPB组和对照组。主要结局指标是术后6、12、24和48小时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分。次要结局指标包括以口服吗啡毫克当量计算的补救镇痛药剂量、止吐药剂量、插管时间长度以及在重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间。两组在所有时间点的VAS评分相似。ESPB组中重度疼痛(VAS评分>7)的发生率显著更低(50%对15.4%;P = 0.008)。与对照组相比,ESPB组的补救镇痛药剂量也更低(19.04±18.76对9.83±12.84,P = 0.044)。两组间的其他次要结局指标无显著差异。ESPB通过降低OPCAB后重度疼痛的发生率和阿片类药物的使用来提供镇痛效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ba/11051109/558649fce685/jcm-13-02208-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验