Rosenthal R, Kleid J J, Cohen M V
Am Heart J. 1979 Nov;98(5):638-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(79)90291-6.
It is often difficult to make the clinical distinction between acute mitral regurgitation caused by papillary muscle dysfunction or rupture and ventricular septal defect complicating an acute myocardial infarction. A case of a patient with rapidly progressive congestive heart failure and a loud murmur is presented. Echocardiography strongly suggested the presence of a flail posterior mitral leaflet. However, the patient was subsequently found to have rupture of the interventricular septum. This diagnosis was made with bedside right heart catheterization and was later confirmed by left ventriculography and direct inspection at the time of surgery. The mitral valve apparatus was completely normal. Thus this case demonstrates the apparent lack of specificity of the accepted echocardiographic criteria for flail mitral leaflet and acutely ruptured interventricular septum, and the potential necessity of cardiac catheterization to distinguish between these entities.
临床上常常难以区分由乳头肌功能障碍或破裂引起的急性二尖瓣反流与并发急性心肌梗死的室间隔缺损。本文报告了一例患有快速进展性充血性心力衰竭且伴有响亮杂音的患者。超声心动图强烈提示存在二尖瓣后叶连枷样改变。然而,该患者随后被发现存在室间隔破裂。这一诊断通过床边右心导管检查得以做出,随后经左心室造影及手术时的直接检查得以证实。二尖瓣装置完全正常。因此,该病例表明,目前公认的用于诊断二尖瓣叶连枷样改变和急性室间隔破裂的超声心动图标准明显缺乏特异性,以及进行心导管检查以区分这些病变的潜在必要性。