• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Mepliex Ag Versus Xeroform As A Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Dressing: Bad Habits Die Hard.美皮康银敷料与黄凡士林纱布作为中厚皮片供皮区敷料的疗效比较:积习难改。
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2023 Sep 30;36(3):243-250. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Evaluation of Six Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor-site Dressing Materials in a Swine Model.在猪模型中对六种中厚皮片供皮区敷料材料的评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Jan 6;1(9):e84. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000031. eCollection 2013 Dec.
3
Comparison of donor-site healing under Xeroform and Jelonet dressings: unexpected findings.Xeroform和Jelonet敷料下供皮区愈合情况的比较:意外发现。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Aug;112(2):430-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000070408.33700.C7.
4
The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.现代敷料在处理中厚皮片供皮区的应用:一项单中心随机对照试验。
J Wound Care. 2017 Jun 2;26(6):281-291. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.281.
5
Management of skin-grafted burn wounds with Xeroform and layers of dry coarse-mesh gauze dressing results in excellent graft take and minimal nursing time.使用干纱布和Xeroform(一种医用凡士林纱布)对烧伤创面植皮进行处理,能使植皮成活率高且护理时间短。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 Sep-Oct;16(5):531-4. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00012.
6
A prospective trial comparing Biobrane, Duoderm and xeroform for skin graft donor sites.一项比较生物膜、多爱肤和干纱布用于皮肤移植供区的前瞻性试验。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Jul;173(1):1-5.
7
Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing.断层皮片供皮区的处理。一项比较亲水性聚氨酯吸收性泡沫敷料与凡士林纱布敷料的随机前瞻性试验。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Oct;121(10):1145-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890100055009.
8
Comparison between Aquacel and Aquacel Foam dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor site.比较 Aquacel 和 Aquacel Foam 两种敷贴在切皮供皮区的效果。
J Wound Care. 2021 Dec 1;30(Sup12):S14-S20. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup12.S14.
9
Evaluation of an oxygen-diffusion dressing for accelerated healing of donor-site wounds.评估一种用于加速供皮区伤口愈合的氧扩散敷料。
J Burn Care Res. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):214-8. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31829b3338.
10
Xeroform Stick-Down Dressing: A Novel Treatment for Pediatric Partial-Thickness Burns.Xeroform 棒状粘贴敷料:小儿部分厚度烧伤的一种新治疗方法。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 1;92(4S Suppl 2):S123-S128. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003795. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics, treatments and outcomes in patients with severe burn wounds; a 10 year cohort study on acute and reconstructive treatment.严重烧伤患者的特征、治疗和结局;一项关于急性和重建治疗的 10 年队列研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 22;19(11):e0313287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313287. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The antimicrobial spectrum of Xeroform.黄碘的抗菌谱。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1189-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.10.023. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.现代敷料在处理中厚皮片供皮区的应用:一项单中心随机对照试验。
J Wound Care. 2017 Jun 2;26(6):281-291. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.281.
3
Wound Dressings and Comparative Effectiveness Data.伤口敷料与比较有效性数据。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014 Aug 1;3(8):511-529. doi: 10.1089/wound.2012.0401.
4
Clinical Impact Upon Wound Healing and Inflammation in Moist, Wet, and Dry Environments.潮湿、湿润和干燥环境对伤口愈合及炎症的临床影响。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013 Sep;2(7):348-356. doi: 10.1089/wound.2012.0412.
5
A randomized comparison study of Aquacel Ag and Alginate Silver as skin graft donor site dressings.水胶体银(Aquacel Ag)与藻酸盐银敷料用于供皮区创面的随机对照比较研究。
Burns. 2013 Dec;39(8):1547-50. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
6
The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing: a clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and aquacel.理想的断层皮片供皮区敷料:改良型聚氨酯敷料与水胶体敷料的临床对比试验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Oct;128(4):918-924. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c02.
7
Management of split-thickness skin graft donor site: a prospective clinical trial for comparison of five different dressing materials.分层皮片供皮区的处理:五种不同敷贴材料的前瞻性临床对比研究。
Burns. 2010 Nov;36(7):999-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.05.017. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
8
Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings.系统评价皮肤移植供皮区敷料。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):298-306. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a8072f.
9
Comparison of the ionic silver-containing hydrofiber and paraffin gauze dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor sites.含离子银水凝胶纤维敷料与石蜡油纱布敷料用于中厚皮片供皮区的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Apr;62(4):421-2. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31818a65e9.
10
Antimicrobial activities of silver dressings: an in vitro comparison.银敷料的抗菌活性:一项体外比较研究。
J Med Microbiol. 2006 Jan;55(Pt 1):59-63. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46124-0.

美皮康银敷料与黄凡士林纱布作为中厚皮片供皮区敷料的疗效比较:积习难改。

Efficacy of Mepliex Ag Versus Xeroform As A Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Dressing: Bad Habits Die Hard.

作者信息

Lisiecki J L, Buta M R, Taylor S, Tait M, Farina N, Levin J, Schulz J, Sangji N, Friedstat J, Hemmila M R, Wang S, Levi B, Goverman J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2023 Sep 30;36(3):243-250. eCollection 2023 Sep.

PMID:38680433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11041881/
Abstract

Autografting with split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) remains an essential procedure in burn and reconstructive surgery. The process of harvesting STSG, however, leaves behind a donor site, an exposed area of partial-thickness dermis left to heal by secondary intention. There has yet to be a consensus amongst surgeons regarding optimal management of the donor site. The ideal donor site dressing is one that allows for expeditious healing while minimizing pain and infection. Despite numerous studies demonstrating the superiority of moist wound healing, many surgeons continue to treat STSG donor sites dry, with petroleum-based gauze. In this study, two burn centers performed a retrospective review of burn patients whose STSG donor sites were treated with either Xeroform or Mepilex Ag dressings. Infections were documented and in a subgroup analysis of patients, postoperative pain scores were noted and total opiate usage during hospitalization was calculated. Analysis revealed an overall infection rate of 1.2% in the Mepilex Ag group and 11.4% in the Xeroform group (p<0.0001). Patients with Xeroform donor site dressings had increased odds of donor site infection (OR=10.8, p=0.002). In subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences in maximum pain scores between Mepilex Ag and Xeroform groups, nor were there differences in opiate usage. STSG donor sites dressed with silver foam dressings have a lower rate of donor site infection relative to those dressed with petroleum-based gauze. Moist donor site dressings such as foam dressings (including Mepilex Ag) should be the standard of care in STSG donor site wound care.

摘要

自体移植中厚皮片(STSG)仍然是烧伤和重建手术中的一项重要手术。然而,采集STSG的过程会留下供皮区,即部分厚度真皮的暴露区域,需通过二期愈合来愈合。外科医生对于供皮区的最佳处理方法尚未达成共识。理想的供皮区敷料应能促进快速愈合,同时将疼痛和感染降至最低。尽管众多研究表明湿性伤口愈合具有优越性,但许多外科医生仍继续使用凡士林纱布对STSG供皮区进行干性处理。在本研究中,两个烧伤中心对接受Xeroform或Mepilex Ag敷料治疗的STSG供皮区烧伤患者进行了回顾性研究。记录感染情况,并在患者亚组分析中记录术后疼痛评分,计算住院期间的总阿片类药物使用量。分析显示,Mepilex Ag组的总体感染率为1.2%,Xeroform组为11.4%(p<0.0001)。使用Xeroform供皮区敷料的患者发生供皮区感染的几率更高(OR=10.8,p=0.002)。在亚组分析中,Mepilex Ag组和Xeroform组之间的最大疼痛评分无显著差异,阿片类药物使用量也无差异。与使用凡士林纱布的供皮区相比,使用银泡沫敷料的STSG供皮区感染率更低。湿性供皮区敷料,如泡沫敷料(包括Mepilex Ag)应成为STSG供皮区伤口护理的标准治疗方法。