Suppr超能文献

实体瘤脑转移患者循环肿瘤DNA中的独特基因组改变。

Unique genomic alterations in the circulating tumor DNA of patients with solid tumors brain metastases.

作者信息

Alder Laura, Broadwater Gloria, Green Michelle, Van Swearingen Amanda E D, Lipp Eric S, Clarke Jeffrey Melson, Anders Carey K, Sammons Sarah

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Neurooncol Adv. 2024 Apr 17;6(1):vdae052. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae052. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although serum circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is routine, data from patients with brain metastases (BrMs) is limited. We assessed genomic alterations in ctDNA from patients with solid tumor BrMs in 3 groups: Isolated BrMs with stable extracranial disease (iCNS), concurrent brain and extracranial progression (cCNS), and extracranial progression with no active BrMs (eCNS). We also compared ctDNA alterations between patients with and without BrMs.

METHODS

Patients with a Guardant360 ctDNA profile with ( = 253) and without BrMs ( = 449) from the Duke Molecular Registry between January 2014 and December 2020 were identified. Actionable alterations were defined as FDA-recognized or standard-of-care biomarkers. Disease status was determined via investigator assessment within 30 days of ctDNA collection.

RESULTS

Among the 253 patients with BrMs: 29 (12%) had iCNS, 160 (63%) cCNS, and 64 (25%) eCNS. Breast (BC; 12.0%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 76.4%) were the most common tumor types. (60% vs 25%,  < .001) and (17% vs 5%,  = .022) were more frequent in BC BrMs. In NSCLC BrMs, alterations were most frequent in the iCNS group (iCNS: 67%, cCNS: 40%, eCNS:37%,  = .08) and in patients with BrMs (36% vs 17%,  < .001). Sequencing from both brain tissue and ctDNA were available for 8 patients; 7 (87.5%) had identical alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illustrates the feasibility of detecting alterations from ctDNA among patients with BrMs. A higher frequency of actionable mutations was observed in ctDNA in patients with BrMs. Additional studies comparing ctDNA and alterations in BrMs tissue are needed to determine if ctDNA can be considered a surrogate to support treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

尽管血清循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)检测已成为常规操作,但有关脑转移(BrMs)患者的数据仍然有限。我们评估了三组实体瘤脑转移患者ctDNA中的基因组改变:颅外疾病稳定的孤立性脑转移(iCNS)、脑和颅外同时进展(cCNS)以及无活动性脑转移的颅外进展(eCNS)。我们还比较了有和无脑转移患者之间的ctDNA改变情况。

方法

从2014年1月至2020年12月的杜克分子登记处中,确定了有(n = 253)和无脑转移(n = 449)的Guardant360 ctDNA检测结果的患者。可操作的改变被定义为美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)认可的或护理标准生物标志物。疾病状态通过在ctDNA采集后30天内由研究者评估确定。

结果

在253例脑转移患者中:29例(12%)为iCNS,160例(63%)为cCNS,64例(25%)为eCNS。乳腺癌(BC;12.0%)和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC;76.4%)是最常见的肿瘤类型。BC脑转移患者中PIK3CA(60%对25%,P <.001)和AKT1(17%对5%,P = 0.022)改变更为常见。在NSCLC脑转移患者中,EGFR改变在iCNS组最为常见(iCNS:67%,cCNS:40%,eCNS:37%,P = 0.08),且在有脑转移患者中更常见(36%对17%,P <.001)。8例患者同时有脑组织和ctDNA测序结果;7例(87.5%)有相同的改变。

结论

本研究说明了在脑转移患者中从ctDNA检测改变的可行性。在脑转移患者的ctDNA中观察到更高频率的可操作突变。需要进一步研究比较ctDNA和脑转移组织中的改变,以确定ctDNA是否可被视为支持治疗决策的替代物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/11046982/466758dc7552/vdae052_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验