Fiszdon Joanna M, Wang Kaicheng, Lê Karen, Parente Lori, Choi Jimmy
VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Psychology Service, 116B, 950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516, United States of America.
Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT 06511, United States of America.
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2024 Apr 20;37:100313. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2024.100313. eCollection 2024 Sep.
While cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) and compensatory strategy training both have large literature bases supporting their efficacy on both proximal and distal outcomes, the research base on stand-alone cognitive training (CT) is smaller and less consistent, with little information about factors associated with better outcomes. In this study, we examined the efficacy of CT on training task, cognitive, symptom, and functional ability measures as well as the impact of motivational interviewing (MI), motivation level, and session attendance on treatment outcomes. Adults with psychotic spectrum disorders ( = 114) were randomized to MI or a sham control interview (CI), followed by 4 months of computerized CT. In whole sample analyses, participants improved on training tasks, cognitive performance, and psychiatric symptoms, but self-reported cognition, self-reported depression, and functional ability did not change. Compared to CI, MI was associated with greater reductions in self-reported depressive symptoms. Motivation level and session attendance did not significantly influence outcomes. Findings support the efficacy of CT on several key outcomes, and its simplicity may be advantageous in uptake in community clinics with limited staffing. The lack of functional gains underscores the need to incorporate treatment ingredients that promote generalization and real-world implementation of learned skills. We also speculate that engagement during course of training may be a better predictor of training success than baseline task-specific motivation.
虽然认知康复治疗(CRT)和代偿策略训练都有大量文献支持它们在近端和远端结果方面的疗效,但关于独立认知训练(CT)的研究基础较小且不太一致,关于与更好结果相关因素的信息很少。在本研究中,我们考察了CT在训练任务、认知、症状和功能能力测量方面的疗效,以及动机访谈(MI)、动机水平和疗程出席率对治疗结果的影响。患有精神谱系障碍的成年人(n = 114)被随机分配到MI组或假对照访谈(CI)组,随后进行4个月的计算机化CT。在全样本分析中,参与者在训练任务、认知表现和精神症状方面有所改善,但自我报告的认知、自我报告的抑郁和功能能力没有变化。与CI相比,MI与自我报告的抑郁症状更大程度的减轻相关。动机水平和疗程出席率对结果没有显著影响。研究结果支持CT在几个关键结果方面的疗效,其简单性可能有利于人员配备有限的社区诊所采用。功能未改善凸显了纳入促进所学技能泛化和实际应用的治疗要素的必要性。我们还推测,训练过程中的参与度可能比基线特定任务动机更能预测训练成功。