Gundle Kenneth R, Rajasekaran Karthik, Houlton Jeffrey, Deutsch Gary B, Ow Thomas J, Maki Robert G, Pang John, Nathan Cherie-Ann O, Clayburgh Daniel, Newman Jason G, Brinkmann Elyse, Wagner Michael J, Pollack Seth M, Thompson Matthew J, Li Ryan J, Mehta Vikas, Schiff Bradley A, Wenig Barry I, Swiecicki Paul L, Tang Alice L, Davis Jessica L, van Zante Annemieke, Bertout Jessica A, Jenkins Wendy, Turner Atticus, Grenley Marc, Burns Connor, Frazier Jason P, Merrell Angela, Sottero Kimberly H W, Derry Jonathan M J, Gillespie Kate C, Mills Bre, Klinghoffer Richard A
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR, United States.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1367581. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1367581. eCollection 2024.
Drug development is systemically inefficient. Research and development costs for novel therapeutics average hundreds of millions to billions of dollars, with the overall likelihood of approval estimated to be as low as 6.7% for oncology drugs. Over half of these failures are due to a lack of drug efficacy. This pervasive and repeated low rate of success exemplifies how preclinical models fail to adequately replicate the complexity and heterogeneity of human cancer. Therefore, new methods of evaluation, early in the development trajectory, are essential both to rule-in and rule-out novel agents with more rigor and speed, but also to spare clinical trial patients from the potentially toxic sequelae (high risk) of testing investigational agents that have a low likelihood of producing a response (low benefit). The clinical oncology (CIVO) platform was designed to change this drug development paradigm. CIVO precisely delivers microdose quantities of up to 8 drugs or combinations directly into patient tumors 4-96 h prior to planned surgical resection. Resected tissue is then analyzed for responses at each site of intratumoral drug exposure. To date, CIVO has been used safely in 6 clinical trials, including 68 subjects, with 5 investigational and 17 approved agents. Resected tissues were analyzed initially using immunohistochemistry and hybridization assays (115 biomarkers). As technology advanced, the platform was paired with spatial biology analysis platforms, to successfully track anti-neoplastic and immune-modulating activity of the injected agents in the intact tumor microenvironment. Herein we provide a report of the use of CIVO technology in patients, a depiction of the robust analysis methods enabled by this platform, and a description of the operational and regulatory mechanisms used to deploy this approach in synergistic partnership with pharmaceutical partners. We further detail how use of the CIVO platform is a clinically safe and scientifically precise alternative or complement to preclinical efficacy modeling, with outputs that inform, streamline, and de-risk drug development.
药物研发在系统层面效率低下。新型疗法的研发成本平均高达数亿至数十亿美元,肿瘤药物的总体获批可能性估计低至6.7%。这些失败案例中,超过一半是由于药物疗效不佳。这种普遍且反复出现的低成功率表明临床前模型未能充分复制人类癌症的复杂性和异质性。因此,在研发早期采用新的评估方法至关重要,这既能更严格、快速地筛选出有潜力的新型药物,又能避免让临床试验患者承受测试那些产生反应可能性低(低获益)的研究药物所带来的潜在毒性后果(高风险)。临床肿瘤学(CIVO)平台旨在改变这种药物研发模式。CIVO可在计划手术切除前4至96小时,将多达8种药物或药物组合的微量剂量精确递送至患者肿瘤内。然后对切除的组织进行分析,以检测肿瘤内药物暴露各部位的反应。迄今为止,CIVO已在6项临床试验中安全使用,涉及68名受试者,使用了5种研究药物和17种获批药物。最初使用免疫组织化学和杂交分析(115种生物标志物)对切除组织进行分析。随着技术的进步,该平台与空间生物学分析平台相结合,成功追踪了完整肿瘤微环境中注射药物的抗肿瘤和免疫调节活性。在此,我们报告CIVO技术在患者中的应用情况,描述该平台所启用的强大分析方法,并介绍与制药合作伙伴协同合作以部署此方法所使用的操作和监管机制。我们进一步详细阐述了CIVO平台的使用如何成为临床前疗效建模在临床方面安全且科学精确的替代方法或补充手段,其结果可为药物研发提供信息、简化流程并降低风险。