Suppr超能文献

FHIR 和 CDA 中的双重实现指南。

Dual Implementation Guides in FHIR and CDA.

机构信息

ELGA GmbH, Vienna, Austria.

Advanced Information Systems and Technology, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg, Austria.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Apr 26;313:49-54. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) are standards for the healthcare industry, designed to improve the exchange of health data by interoperability. Both standards are constrained through what are known as Implementation Guides (IG) for specific use.

OBJECTIVES

Both of these two standards are widely in use and play an important role in the Austrian healthcare system. Concepts existing in CDA and FHIR must be aligned between both standards.

METHODS

Many existing approaches are presented and discussed, none are fully suited to the needs in Austria.

RESULTS

The IG Publisher has already been used for CDA IGs, beside of its intended FHIR support, but never for both in one IG. Even the International Patient Summary (IPS), existing as CDA and FHIR specification, does not solve the needed comparability between these two.

CONCLUSION

As the IG Publisher is widely used and supports CDA, it should be used for Dual Implementation Guides. Further work and extension of IG Publisher is necessary to enhance the readability of the resulting IGs.

摘要

背景

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources(FHIR)和 Clinical Document Architecture(CDA)是医疗保健行业的标准,旨在通过互操作性提高健康数据的交换效率。这两个标准都受到特定用途的实施指南(Implementation Guide,IG)的限制。

目的

这两个标准都在奥地利的医疗保健系统中得到了广泛应用,并发挥着重要作用。CDA 和 FHIR 中的现有概念必须在这两个标准之间保持一致。

方法

本文介绍并讨论了许多现有的方法,但没有一种方法完全适合奥地利的需求。

结果

除了预期的 FHIR 支持外,IG Publisher 已经用于 CDA IG,但从未在一个 IG 中同时用于两者。即使作为 CDA 和 FHIR 规范存在的国际患者摘要(IPS)也不能解决这两者之间所需的可比性。

结论

由于 IG Publisher 被广泛使用且支持 CDA,因此应该用于双重实施指南。需要进一步的工作和扩展 IG Publisher,以提高生成的 IG 的可读性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验