Kim Mirinae, Won Jae-Yon, Choi Seung-Yong, Kim Minhee, Ra Ho, Jee Donghyun, Kwon Jin-Woo, Kang Kui-Dong, Roh Young-Jung, Park Young-Gun, Kang Seungbum, Shin Jeong-Ah, Yim Hyeon-Woo, Park Young-Hoon
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 21;10(12):2727. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122727.
We aimed to evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without autologous platelet concentrate (APC) injection in patients with recurrent macular holes (MHs), large MHs, or MHs with high myopia. This multicenter, prospective, interventional randomized controlled trial was conducted from March 2017 to April 2020. Participants were randomly allocated to a PPV group or a PPV+APC group. All participants underwent standard 25-gauge PPV, and eyes in the PPV+APC group underwent PPV with intravitreal APC injection before air-gas exchange. A total of 117 patients were enrolled (PPV group: = 59, PPV+APC group: = 58). Hole closure was achieved in 47 participants (79.7%) in the PPV group and 52 participants (89.7%) in the PPV+APC group. There were no between-group differences in the anatomical closure rate or functional outcomes including best-corrected visual acuity, metamorphopsia, pattern-reversal visual evoked potential, or Visual Function Questionnaire-25 score. The use of APC injection does not improve the anatomical and functional outcomes of surgery for large MHs, recurrent MHs, or MHs with high myopia. The adjunctive use of APC can be considered in selected cases because it is not inferior to conventional MH surgery, is relatively simple to perform, and is not affected by the surgeon's skill.
我们旨在评估在复发性黄斑裂孔(MH)、大尺寸MH或高度近视性MH患者中,行或不行自体血小板浓缩液(APC)注射的玻璃体切除术(PPV)的解剖学和功能学结果。这项多中心、前瞻性、干预性随机对照试验于2017年3月至2020年4月进行。参与者被随机分配至PPV组或PPV + APC组。所有参与者均接受标准的25G PPV,PPV + APC组的眼睛在空气-气体交换前接受PPV联合玻璃体内APC注射。共纳入117例患者(PPV组:n = 59,PPV + APC组:n = 58)。PPV组47例参与者(79.7%)实现了裂孔闭合,PPV + APC组52例参与者(89.7%)实现了裂孔闭合。在解剖学闭合率或功能学结果方面,包括最佳矫正视力、视物变形、图形翻转视觉诱发电位或视觉功能问卷-25评分,两组之间没有差异。对于大尺寸MH、复发性MH或高度近视性MH,使用APC注射并不能改善手术的解剖学和功能学结果。在某些特定情况下,可以考虑辅助使用APC,因为它并不逊于传统的MH手术,操作相对简单,且不受手术医生技术的影响。