Becker Marcie, Shields Richard K, Sass Kelly J
Marcie Becker is the clinical assistant professor/codirector of clinical education in the Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science at the University of Iowa.
Richard K. Shields is the chair/department executive officer in the Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, 1-252 Medical Education Building, Iowa City, IA (
J Phys Ther Educ. 2024 Dec 1;38(4):277-284. doi: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000341. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
Integrated clinical education (ICE) courses require opportunities for practice, assessment of performance, and specific feedback. The purposes of this study were to 1) analyze the internal consistency of a tool for evaluating students during ICE courses, 2) examine the responsiveness of the tool between midterm and final assessments, and 3) develop a model to predict the final score from midterm assessments and explore relationships among the 6 domains.
Several clinical education assessment tools have been developed for terminal clinical experiences, but few have focused on the needs of learners during the ICE.
Eighty-five student assessments were collected from 2 consecutive cohorts of physical therapist students in a first full-time ICE course.
The tool contained 29 items within 6 domains. Items were rated on a 5-point scale from dependent to indirect supervision. Cronbach's alpha was used to analyze the internal consistency of the tool, whereas responsiveness was examined with paired t -test and Cohen's d . A best subsets regression model was used to determine the best combination of midterm variables that predicted the final total scores. Coefficients of determination ( R2 ) were calculated to explore the relationships among domains.
The tool was found to have high internal consistency at midterm and final assessment (α = 0.97 and 0.98, respectively). Mean scores increased over time for each domain score and for the total score ( P < .001; d = 1.5). Scores in 3 midterm domains predicted more than 57% of the variance in the final total score.
Results support the use of this tool to measure student performance and growth in a first full-time ICE course. Targeted measurement of students' abilities in ICE courses assists with differentiating formative and summative learning needed to achieve academic success.
综合临床教育(ICE)课程需要实践机会、对表现的评估以及具体反馈。本研究的目的是:1)分析在ICE课程中用于评估学生的工具的内部一致性;2)检查该工具在中期和期末考试之间的反应性;3)建立一个根据中期评估预测期末考试成绩的模型,并探索六个领域之间的关系。
已经开发了几种用于最终临床经验的临床教育评估工具,但很少有工具关注ICE期间学习者的需求。
从连续两个队列的物理治疗专业学生的首个全日制ICE课程中收集了85份学生评估。
该工具在六个领域包含29个项目。项目按照从依赖监督到间接监督的5分制进行评分。使用Cronbach's alpha分析工具的内部一致性,而通过配对t检验和Cohen's d检查反应性。使用最佳子集回归模型确定预测期末总成绩的中期变量的最佳组合。计算决定系数(R2)以探索各领域之间的关系。
该工具在中期和期末考试中具有较高的内部一致性(α分别为0.97和0.98)。每个领域得分和总分的平均分数随时间增加(P <.001;d = 1.5)。三个中期领域的得分预测了期末总成绩中超过57%的方差。
结果支持使用该工具来衡量首个全日制ICE课程中学生的表现和成长。在ICE课程中有针对性地测量学生的能力有助于区分实现学业成功所需的形成性学习和总结性学习。