Department of Pediatric Oral Health, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel (UZB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Caries Res. 2024;58(5):511-520. doi: 10.1159/000538619. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
This consensus paper provides recommendations for oral health professionals on why and how to assess caries activity and progression with special respect to the site of a lesion.
An expert panel was nominated by the executive councils of the European Organization for Caries Research (ORCA) and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD). The steering committee built three working groups that were asked to provide recommendations on (1) caries detection and diagnostic methods, (2) caries activity and progression assessment, and (3) obtain individualized caries diagnoses. The experts of work group 2 phrased and agreed on provisional general and specific recommendations on caries lesion activity and progression, based on a review of the current literature. These recommendations were then discussed and refined in a consensus workshop followed by an anonymous Delphi survey to determine the agreement on each recommendation.
The expert panel agreed on general (n = 7) and specific recommendations (n = 6). The specific recommendations cover coronal caries on pits and fissures, smooth surfaces, proximal surfaces, as well as root caries and secondary caries/caries adjacent to restorations and sealants. 3/13 recommendations yielded perfect agreement.
The most suitable method for lesion activity assessment is the visual-tactile method. No single clinical characteristic is indicative of lesion activity; instead, lesion activity assessment is based on assessing and weighing several clinical signs. The recall intervals for visual and radiographic examination need to be adjusted to the presence of active caries lesions and recent caries progression rates. Modifications should be based on individual patient characteristics.
本文旨在为口腔健康专业人员提供有关龋病活性和进展评估的建议,特别针对病变部位。
由欧洲龋病研究组织(ORCA)和欧洲保守牙科联合会(EFCD)的执行委员会提名专家组成员。指导委员会成立了三个工作组,要求工作组就(1)龋病检测和诊断方法、(2)龋病活性和进展评估以及(3)获得个体化龋病诊断提供建议。工作组 2 的专家根据对现有文献的回顾,提出并达成了关于龋病病变活性和进展的暂定一般和具体建议。然后在共识研讨会中讨论和完善这些建议,并进行匿名 Delphi 调查,以确定对每项建议的共识程度。
专家组就一般(n = 7)和具体建议(n = 6)达成一致。具体建议涵盖窝沟龋、平滑面龋、邻面龋以及根面龋和继发龋/修复体和封闭剂邻面龋。有 3/13 条建议得到完全一致的认可。
病变活性评估最适合的方法是视觉触觉法。没有单一的临床特征可以指示病变活性;相反,病变活性评估基于评估和权衡几个临床特征。视觉和放射学检查的复查间隔需要根据活性龋病病变的存在和最近的龋病进展率进行调整。修改应基于个体患者的特点。