• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

龋病研究组织-欧洲牙髓病学会共识报告关于龋病诊断临床推荐意见的第二部分:龋损活动性和进展评估。

Organization for Caries Research-European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis Paper II: Caries Lesion Activity and Progression Assessment.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Oral Health, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel (UZB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Caries Res. 2024;58(5):511-520. doi: 10.1159/000538619. Epub 2024 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1159/000538619
PMID:38684147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11446318/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This consensus paper provides recommendations for oral health professionals on why and how to assess caries activity and progression with special respect to the site of a lesion.

METHODS

An expert panel was nominated by the executive councils of the European Organization for Caries Research (ORCA) and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD). The steering committee built three working groups that were asked to provide recommendations on (1) caries detection and diagnostic methods, (2) caries activity and progression assessment, and (3) obtain individualized caries diagnoses. The experts of work group 2 phrased and agreed on provisional general and specific recommendations on caries lesion activity and progression, based on a review of the current literature. These recommendations were then discussed and refined in a consensus workshop followed by an anonymous Delphi survey to determine the agreement on each recommendation.

RESULTS

The expert panel agreed on general (n = 7) and specific recommendations (n = 6). The specific recommendations cover coronal caries on pits and fissures, smooth surfaces, proximal surfaces, as well as root caries and secondary caries/caries adjacent to restorations and sealants. 3/13 recommendations yielded perfect agreement.

CONCLUSION

The most suitable method for lesion activity assessment is the visual-tactile method. No single clinical characteristic is indicative of lesion activity; instead, lesion activity assessment is based on assessing and weighing several clinical signs. The recall intervals for visual and radiographic examination need to be adjusted to the presence of active caries lesions and recent caries progression rates. Modifications should be based on individual patient characteristics.

摘要

简介

本文旨在为口腔健康专业人员提供有关龋病活性和进展评估的建议,特别针对病变部位。

方法

由欧洲龋病研究组织(ORCA)和欧洲保守牙科联合会(EFCD)的执行委员会提名专家组成员。指导委员会成立了三个工作组,要求工作组就(1)龋病检测和诊断方法、(2)龋病活性和进展评估以及(3)获得个体化龋病诊断提供建议。工作组 2 的专家根据对现有文献的回顾,提出并达成了关于龋病病变活性和进展的暂定一般和具体建议。然后在共识研讨会中讨论和完善这些建议,并进行匿名 Delphi 调查,以确定对每项建议的共识程度。

结果

专家组就一般(n = 7)和具体建议(n = 6)达成一致。具体建议涵盖窝沟龋、平滑面龋、邻面龋以及根面龋和继发龋/修复体和封闭剂邻面龋。有 3/13 条建议得到完全一致的认可。

结论

病变活性评估最适合的方法是视觉触觉法。没有单一的临床特征可以指示病变活性;相反,病变活性评估基于评估和权衡几个临床特征。视觉和放射学检查的复查间隔需要根据活性龋病病变的存在和最近的龋病进展率进行调整。修改应基于个体患者的特点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c86b/11446318/6e7023cb89a7/cre-2024-0058-0005-538619_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c86b/11446318/6e7023cb89a7/cre-2024-0058-0005-538619_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c86b/11446318/6e7023cb89a7/cre-2024-0058-0005-538619_F01.jpg

相似文献

1
Organization for Caries Research-European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis Paper II: Caries Lesion Activity and Progression Assessment.龋病研究组织-欧洲牙髓病学会共识报告关于龋病诊断临床推荐意见的第二部分:龋损活动性和进展评估。
Caries Res. 2024;58(5):511-520. doi: 10.1159/000538619. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
2
European Organisation for Caries Research and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis: Paper III - Caries Diagnosis at the Individual Level.欧洲龋病研究组织和欧洲保守牙科联合会关于龋病诊断临床推荐的共识报告:第三部分——个体水平的龋病诊断。
Caries Res. 2024;58(5):521-532. doi: 10.1159/000539427. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
ORCA-EFCD consensus report on clinical recommendation for caries diagnosis. Paper I: caries lesion detection and depth assessment.ORCA-EFCD 共识报告关于龋病诊断的临床推荐。第 I 部分:龋损的检测和深度评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 22;28(4):227. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05597-3.
4
How to Intervene in the Caries Process in Children: A Joint ORCA and EFCD Expert Delphi Consensus Statement.如何干预儿童龋齿进程:ORCA 和 EFCD 联合专家德尔菲共识声明。
Caries Res. 2020;54(4):297-305. doi: 10.1159/000507692. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
5
Rationale and treatment approach in minimally invasive dentistry.微创牙科的基本原理和治疗方法。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Jun;131 Suppl:13S-19S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0394.
6
Hidden caries: what is it? Does it exist? Does it matter?隐匿性龋:它是什么?它存在吗?它重要吗?
Int Dent J. 1997 Oct;47(5):259-65. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.1997.tb00786.x.
7
Micro-filled resin infiltration of fissure caries lesions in vitro.体外微填充树脂浸润治疗窝沟龋损
J Dent. 2017 Feb;57:73-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
8
The invasive pit-and-fissure sealing technique in pediatric dentistry: an SEM study of a preventive restoration.儿童牙科中的侵入性窝沟封闭技术:预防性修复的扫描电子显微镜研究
ASDC J Dent Child. 1988 Jan-Feb;55(1):34-42.
9
Sealing occlusal caries lesions in adults referred for restorative treatment: 2-3 years of follow-up.成人修复治疗转诊患者的窝沟封闭术治疗窝沟龋:2-3 年随访结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Apr;16(2):521-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0549-4. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
10
Occlusal caries: diagnosis and noninvasive treatments.咬合面龋:诊断与非侵入性治疗
Quintessence Int. 1999 Mar;30(3):174-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors and development patterns of approximal caries: a retrospective cross-sectional radiographic assessment.邻面龋的预测因素及发展模式:一项回顾性横断面影像学评估
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05844-3.
2
Effect of photobiomodulation and selective caries removal in deep cavities on postoperative sensitivity, pulp vitality and dentin neoformation: randomized clinical trial and tomographic evaluation.光生物调节和深龋选择性去龋对术后敏感性、牙髓活力和牙本质新生的影响:随机临床试验和断层扫描评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Mar 19;29(4):192. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06263-y.
3
Assessment of the correlation between fluorescence-featured intraoral scanner, laser fluorescence and spectrophotometric analyses in caries-affected dentin: an in-vitro diagnostic accuracy study.

本文引用的文献

1
European Organisation for Caries Research and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis: Paper III - Caries Diagnosis at the Individual Level.欧洲龋病研究组织和欧洲保守牙科联合会关于龋病诊断临床推荐的共识报告:第三部分——个体水平的龋病诊断。
Caries Res. 2024;58(5):521-532. doi: 10.1159/000539427. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
ORCA-EFCD consensus report on clinical recommendation for caries diagnosis. Paper I: caries lesion detection and depth assessment.ORCA-EFCD 共识报告关于龋病诊断的临床推荐。第 I 部分:龋损的检测和深度评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 22;28(4):227. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05597-3.
3
龋损牙本质中荧光特征口腔内扫描仪、激光荧光和分光光度分析之间相关性的评估:一项体外诊断准确性研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Mar 14;40(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04390-2.
4
Minimum intervention oral care: staging and grading dental carious lesions in clinical practice.最低限度干预口腔护理:临床实践中评估和分级龋齿病变。
Br Dent J. 2024 Sep;237(6):457-463. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7843-4. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Arrest of root caries with an adjuvant chlorhexidine-fluoride varnish over a 12-months observation period: a QLF-analyzed, placebo-controlled, randomized, clinical trial (RCT).
在 12 个月的观察期内,使用辅助型氯己定-氟化物漆剂控制根面龋的进展:一项 QLF 分析、安慰剂对照、随机、临床研究(RCT)。
Odontology. 2022 Jan;110(1):193-202. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00637-w. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
4
How to Intervene in the Caries Process in Older Adults: A Joint ORCA and EFCD Expert Delphi Consensus Statement.如何干预老年人的龋病进程:ORCA与EFCD联合专家德尔菲共识声明
Caries Res. 2020 Dec 8;54(5-6):1-7. doi: 10.1159/000510843.
5
Minimum intervention oral healthcare delivery - is there consensus?最小干预口腔医疗服务——是否存在共识?
Br Dent J. 2020 Oct;229(7):393-395. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2235-x.
6
Thermal Imaging of Root Caries In Vivo.体内根面龋的热成像。
J Dent Res. 2020 Dec;99(13):1502-1508. doi: 10.1177/0022034520951157. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
7
How to Intervene in the Caries Process: Dentin Caries in Primary Teeth.如何干预龋齿进程:乳牙的牙本质龋。
Caries Res. 2020;54(4):306-323. doi: 10.1159/000508899. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
8
How to intervene in the caries process in adults: proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement.如何干预成年人的龋齿进程:邻面龋和继发龋?EFCD-ORCA-DGZ 专家德尔菲共识声明。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):3315-3321. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
9
How to Intervene in the Caries Process in Children: A Joint ORCA and EFCD Expert Delphi Consensus Statement.如何干预儿童龋齿进程:ORCA 和 EFCD 联合专家德尔菲共识声明。
Caries Res. 2020;54(4):297-305. doi: 10.1159/000507692. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
10
How to Intervene in the Caries Process: Early Childhood Caries - A Systematic Review.如何干预龋齿进程:幼儿龋齿——系统评价。
Caries Res. 2020;54(2):102-112. doi: 10.1159/000504335. Epub 2020 Jan 7.