Morita Machiko, Sada Kentaro, Hidaka Shuji, Ogawa Miki, Shibata Hirotaka
Department of Diabetes and Metabolism, Koseiren Tsurumi Hospital, Oita, Japan.
Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Rheumatology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Aug;15(8):1075-1083. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14211. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Although several studies have shown the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glycemic variability (GV) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy, no studies have focused on outpatients or used NC-stat®/DPNCheck™, a new point-of-care device for nerve conduction study (NCS). We investigated the association between CGM-derived GV and NCS using DPNCheck™ in outpatients with type 2 diabetes, and further analyzed the difference in results between patients with and without well-controlled HbA1c levels.
All outpatients with type 2 diabetes using the CGM device (FreeStyle Libre Pro®) between 2017 and 2022 were investigated. Sural nerve conduction was evaluated by sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude and sensory conduction velocity (SCV) using DPNCheck™. Associations of CGM-derived GV metrics with SNAP amplitude and SCV were investigated.
In total, 304 outpatients with type 2 diabetes were included. In a linear regression model, most CGM-derived GV metrics except for the mean amplitude of glucose excursion and low blood glucose index were significantly associated with SCV, but not with SNAP amplitude. The significant associations of most CGM-derived GV metrics with SCV remained after adjustment for possible confounding factors, but not after adjustment for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Most CGM-derived GV metrics were significantly associated with SCV after adjustment for HbA1c in patients with a HbA1c ≤ 6.9%, but not in those with a HbA1c ≥ 7.0%.
In outpatients with type 2 diabetes, multiple CGM-derived GV metrics were significantly associated with SCV obtained by DPNCheck™. GV may have independent impacts on peripheral nerve function, particularly in patients with well-controlled HbA1c levels.
目的/引言:尽管多项研究表明持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)得出的血糖变异性(GV)与糖尿病周围神经病变之间存在关联,但尚无研究关注门诊患者或使用神经传导研究(NCS)的新型即时检测设备NC-stat®/DPNCheck™。我们研究了2型糖尿病门诊患者中CGM得出的GV与使用DPNCheck™进行的NCS之间的关联,并进一步分析了糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平控制良好和未控制良好的患者之间的结果差异。
对2017年至2022年间使用CGM设备(FreeStyle Libre Pro®)的所有2型糖尿病门诊患者进行了调查。使用DPNCheck™通过感觉神经动作电位(SNAP)幅度和感觉传导速度(SCV)评估腓肠神经传导。研究了CGM得出的GV指标与SNAP幅度和SCV之间的关联。
总共纳入了304例2型糖尿病门诊患者。在一个线性回归模型中,除葡萄糖波动平均幅度和低血糖指数外,大多数CGM得出的GV指标与SCV显著相关,但与SNAP幅度无关。在对可能的混杂因素进行调整后,大多数CGM得出的GV指标与SCV的显著关联仍然存在,但在对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)进行调整后则不存在。在HbA1c≤6.9%的患者中,对HbA1c进行调整后,大多数CGM得出的GV指标与SCV显著相关,但在HbA1c≥7.0%的患者中则不然。
在2型糖尿病门诊患者中,多个CGM得出的GV指标与通过DPNCheck™获得的SCV显著相关。GV可能对周围神经功能有独立影响,尤其是在HbA1c水平控制良好的患者中。