• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同麻醉技术对结直肠癌患者切除术后预后的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Effect of different anaesthetic techniques on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer after resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Xia Shijun, Zhu Yuwen, Wu Wenjiang, Li Yue, Yu Linchong

机构信息

Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 15;14:1397197. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397197. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1397197
PMID:38686187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11056503/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anaesthesia (IA) on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer after resection is controversial. This study aimed to explore the effects of different anaesthesia methods on the postoperative prognosis of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant literature from each database's inception until 18 November 2023. The literature topic was to compare the effects of TIVA and IA on the prognosis of patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection.

RESULTS

Six studies were selected for meta-analysis. The studies involved 111043 patients, with a trial size of 1001-88184 people. A statistically significant difference was observed in the overall survival (OS) between colorectal cancer patients administered TIVA and IA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.99), but none in recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90-1.08). In the subgroup analysis of OS, no statistically significant difference was observed between colorectal cancer patients administered TIVA and IA in Asia (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.57-1.05), and not in Europe (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.06). Regarding tumour location, no significant association was found between TIVA and IA in the colon, rectum and colorectum ((HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.38-1.28), (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.08) and (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.06), respectively).

CONCLUSION

OS differed significantly between patients administered TIVA and IA when undergoing colorectal cancer resection, but no difference was observed in RFS. The prognostic effects of TIVA and IA differed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023453185, identifier CRD42023453185.

摘要

背景

全静脉麻醉(TIVA)和吸入麻醉(IA)对结直肠癌患者切除术后预后的影响存在争议。本研究旨在探讨不同麻醉方法对结直肠癌患者术后预后的影响。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,从各数据库建库至2023年11月18日的相关文献。文献主题为比较TIVA和IA对接受结直肠癌切除术患者预后的影响。

结果

选择6项研究进行荟萃分析。这些研究涉及111043例患者,试验规模为1001 - 88184人。接受TIVA和IA的结直肠癌患者的总生存期(OS)存在统计学显著差异(风险比[HR],0.83;95%置信区间[CI],0.70 - 0.99),但无病生存期(RFS)无差异(HR,0.99;95% CI,0.90 - 1.08)。在OS的亚组分析中,亚洲接受TIVA和IA的结直肠癌患者之间未观察到统计学显著差异(HR,0.77;95% CI,0.57 - 1.05),欧洲也未观察到(HR,0.99;95% CI,0.93 - 1.06)。关于肿瘤位置,在结肠、直肠和结直肠中TIVA和IA之间未发现显著关联((HR,0.70;95% CI,0.38 - 1.28)、(HR,0.95;95% CI,0.83 - 1.08)和(HR,0.99;95% CI,0.93 - 1.06))。

结论

接受结直肠癌切除术的患者中,接受TIVA和IA的患者OS存在显著差异,但RFS无差异。TIVA和IA的预后影响不同。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023453185,标识符CRD42023453185。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/6394e4f25021/fonc-14-1397197-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/128d4a88bed7/fonc-14-1397197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/4039db9e3c49/fonc-14-1397197-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/b25da26e72d0/fonc-14-1397197-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/d8cd3e95ec4f/fonc-14-1397197-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/6394e4f25021/fonc-14-1397197-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/128d4a88bed7/fonc-14-1397197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/4039db9e3c49/fonc-14-1397197-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/b25da26e72d0/fonc-14-1397197-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/d8cd3e95ec4f/fonc-14-1397197-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ee/11056503/6394e4f25021/fonc-14-1397197-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of different anaesthetic techniques on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer after resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同麻醉技术对结直肠癌患者切除术后预后的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 15;14:1397197. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397197. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of Different General Anesthesia Methods on the Prognosis of Patients with Breast Cancer after Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.不同全身麻醉方法对乳腺癌切除术后患者预后影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 28;2022:6846079. doi: 10.1155/2022/6846079. eCollection 2022.
3
Tumor-associated lymphatic vessel density is a reliable biomarker for prognosis of esophageal cancer after radical resection: a systemic review and meta-analysis.肿瘤相关淋巴管密度是食管癌根治术后预后的可靠生物标志物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 20;15:1453482. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1453482. eCollection 2024.
4
Anesthesia and Long-term Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.麻醉与长期肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):623-634. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005237.
5
Total intravenous anaesthesia versus single-drug pharmacological antiemetic prophylaxis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.成人全静脉麻醉与单药药理学抗呕吐预防:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;33(10):750-60. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000520.
6
Impact of Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia on Long-term Survival After Cancer Surgery in a Nationwide Cohort.基于丙泊酚的全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对全国队列癌症手术后长期生存的影响。
Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):1024-1031. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005568. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
7
Anaesthetic techniques for risk of malignant tumour recurrence.恶性肿瘤复发风险的麻醉技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 7;2014(11):CD008877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008877.pub2.
8
Survival after radiofrequency ablation and/or chemotherapy for lung cancer and pulmonary metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肺癌和肺转移灶射频消融和/或化疗后的生存:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 6;14:1240149. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1240149. eCollection 2023.
9
Prognostic Role of Lymphocyte-C-Reactive Protein Ratio in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.淋巴细胞与C反应蛋白比值在结直肠癌中的预后作用:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 6;12:905144. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.905144. eCollection 2022.
10
Effect of total intravenous versus inhalation anesthesia on long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing curative resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对早期非小细胞肺癌根治性切除术后患者长期肿瘤学结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug;76(4):336-347. doi: 10.4097/kja.22584. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Total intravenous or inhalational volatile anaesthesia and survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a Swedish national registry study.全静脉麻醉或吸入挥发性麻醉与结直肠癌手术后的生存率:一项瑞典国家登记研究
Anaesthesia. 2025 Apr;80(4):386-394. doi: 10.1111/anae.16495. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
The relationship between anesthesia, surgery and postoperative immune function in cancer patients: a review.麻醉、手术与癌症患者术后免疫功能的关系:综述
Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1441020. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1441020. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Tumour excisional surgery, anaesthetic-analgesic techniques, and oncologic outcomes: a narrative review.肿瘤切除术、麻醉-镇痛技术和肿瘤学结果:叙述性综述。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Dec;131(6):989-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.07.027. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
2
Impact of Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia on Long-term Survival After Cancer Surgery in a Nationwide Cohort.基于丙泊酚的全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对全国队列癌症手术后长期生存的影响。
Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):1024-1031. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005568. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Early and Long-Term Outcomes after Propofol-and Sevoflurane-Based Anesthesia in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.
基于丙泊酚和七氟烷麻醉的结直肠癌手术的早期和长期结局:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2022 May 8;11(9):2648. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092648.
4
Expression Profiles of Immune Cells after Propofol or Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Double-blind Randomized Trial.丙泊酚或七氟醚麻醉用于结直肠癌手术对免疫细胞表达谱的影响:一项前瞻性双盲随机试验。
Anesthesiology. 2022 Mar 1;136(3):448-458. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004119.
5
Inhalation or total intravenous anaesthesia and recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matched Danish registry-based study.吸入或全静脉麻醉与结直肠癌手术后复发:一项基于丹麦登记处的倾向评分匹配研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):921-930. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.11.019. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
6
Volatile versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cancer Prognosis in Patients Having Digestive Cancer Surgery.静脉全身麻醉与挥发性麻醉对消化道癌症手术患者癌症预后的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Oct 1;133(4):764-773. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003440.
7
Anesthesia and Circulating Tumor Cells in Primary Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.原发性乳腺癌患者的麻醉与循环肿瘤细胞:一项随机对照试验。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Sep;133(3):548-558. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003409.
8
Colorectal cancer.结直肠癌。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 19;394(10207):1467-1480. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0.
9
Correction to: Anesthetic technique and cancer outcomes: a meta-analysis of total intravenous versus volatile anesthesia.对《麻醉技术与癌症预后:全静脉麻醉与挥发性麻醉的荟萃分析》的更正
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;66(8):1007-1008. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01381-0.
10
Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Is Associated with Better Survival Than Desflurane Anesthesia in Colon Cancer Surgery.丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉与地氟烷麻醉在结肠癌手术中与更好的生存相关。
Anesthesiology. 2018 Nov;129(5):932-941. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002357.