Suppr超能文献

评估转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的一线治疗策略:一项综合网络荟萃分析和系统评价

Evaluating first-line therapeutic strategies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a comprehensive network meta-analysis and systematic review.

作者信息

Zhang Duojie, Weng Haimin, Zhu Zhangji, Gong Weilun, Ma Yinfeng

机构信息

The Second Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 15;14:1378993. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1378993. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of first-line treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS

We systematically searched electronic databases, including PubMed and Web of Science, for studies published from their inception to April 3rd, 2023. Inclusion criteria were: 1) Completed Phase III or IV randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; 2) Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of mCRPC who had not previously received chemotherapy or novel endocrine therapies. We conducted a network meta-analysis using R software (version 3.4.0). Network graphs and risk of bias graphs were generated using Stata 14.0 and RevMan 5.4, respectively. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was the incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

Seven RCTs encompassing 6,641 patients were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that both docetaxel+prednisone (DP) and cabazitaxel+prednisone (CP) significantly improved OS compared to abiraterone. Compared to placebo, DP showed comparable results to both cabazitaxel 20 mg/m+prednisone (C20P) and cabazitaxel 25 mg/m+prednisone (C25P) in terms of OS. For SAEs, both DP and C20P were superior to C25P, with no statistical difference between C20P and DP. The probability ranking plots indicated that C25P ranked highest for OS, while DP ranked highest for SAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our network meta-analysis, we recommend cabazitaxel 20 mg/m+prednisone (C20P) as the primary choice for first-line management of mCRPC, followed by DP. Enzalutamide and abiraterone are suggested as subsequent options. Radium-223 may be considered for patients presenting with bone metastases.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023443943.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)一线治疗方案的相对疗效和安全性。

方法

我们系统检索了电子数据库,包括PubMed和Web of Science,以查找从建库至2023年4月3日发表的研究。纳入标准为:1)在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的完成的III期或IV期随机对照试验(RCT);2)确诊为mCRPC且此前未接受过化疗或新型内分泌治疗的患者。我们使用R软件(版本3.4.0)进行了网络荟萃分析。分别使用Stata 14.0和RevMan 5.4生成网络图和偏倚风险图。主要结局为总生存期(OS),次要结局为严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率。

结果

纳入了7项RCT,共6641例患者。网络荟萃分析显示,与阿比特龙相比,多西他赛+泼尼松(DP)和卡巴他赛+泼尼松(CP)均显著改善了OS。与安慰剂相比,在OS方面,DP与卡巴他赛20mg/m²+泼尼松(C20P)和卡巴他赛25mg/m²+泼尼松(C25P)的结果相当。对于SAE,DP和C20P均优于C25P,C20P和DP之间无统计学差异。概率排序图表明,C25P在OS方面排名最高,而DP在SAE方面排名最高。

结论

基于我们的网络荟萃分析,我们推荐卡巴他赛20mg/m²+泼尼松(C20P)作为mCRPC一线治疗的首选,其次是DP。恩杂鲁胺和阿比特龙建议作为后续选择。对于有骨转移的患者,可考虑使用镭-223。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符CRD42023443943。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dd0/11056588/14d132c056f0/fonc-14-1378993-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验