Rahmati Farima, Aslzaker Maryam, Noori Mohammad, Abasi Imaneh
Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran J Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;19(2):196-209. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v19i2.15105.
To understand the consequences of an invalidating environment, it is essential to have a measurement tool with appropriate statistical properties. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to render the ICES (Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale) into Persian and subsequently evaluate the psychometric attributes of this translated version. Data were collected from 1221 nonclinical participants, including 1053 females and 168 males, who were students at medical universities in Tehran, Iran. Several questionnaires, such as the ICES, CTQ (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire), DTS (Distress Tolerance Scale), BIS-11 (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale), Self-Compassion Questionnaire, Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire, and EAT-26 (Eating AttitudesTest) were used in the study. The data sets were investigated through SPSS and R language to evaluate the ICES' reliability and construct validity. Additionally, Item Response Theory (IRT) was employed with the Graded Response Model (GRM) to measure the psychometric properties of each item in terms of difficulty and discrimination parameters. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that both single-factor and two-factor models fit well for both maternal and paternal versions of the ICES. The internal consistency, as assessed by Cronbach's alpha, was high and satisfactory for both maternal (0.87) and paternal (0.87) versions. Notably, the IRT analysis revealed that item 9 performed poorly in both maternal and paternal versions. Compared to the one-factor model, the two-factor model demonstrated a superior fit. Additionally, the test-retest reliability of the ICES over two months demonstrated good reliability for both maternal and paternal versions (0.98). Divergent and convergent validity analysis revealed a significant negative relationship between childhood invalidation environment and distress tolerance (r = 0.175, P < 0.01) as well as self-compassion (r = 0.142, P < 0.01), which were inversely related to the ICES. Furthermore, there was a considerably positive correlation between the invalidating environment experienced during childhood and impulsivity, as evidenced by r = 0.196 and P < 0.01. This study established the favorable psychometric properties of the Persian version of the ICES, indicating that this version is reliable and valid to assess the Invalidating Childhood Environment in the Iranian population. However, further investigations are warranted to reevaluate its validity and reliability.
为了解无效环境的后果,拥有一个具有适当统计特性的测量工具至关重要。因此,本研究的主要目的是将ICES(童年无效环境量表)翻译成波斯语,随后评估该翻译版本的心理测量属性。数据收集自1221名非临床参与者,其中包括1053名女性和168名男性,他们是伊朗德黑兰医科大学的学生。本研究使用了几份问卷,如ICES、CTQ(童年创伤问卷)、DTS(痛苦耐受力量表)、BIS - 11(巴拉特冲动性量表)、自我同情问卷、荷兰饮食行为问卷和EAT - 26(饮食态度测试)。通过SPSS和R语言对数据集进行研究,以评估ICES的信度和结构效度。此外,采用项目反应理论(IRT)和等级反应模型(GRM)从难度和区分度参数方面测量每个条目的心理测量属性。验证性因素分析表明,单因素模型和双因素模型对ICES的母亲版和父亲版均拟合良好。通过克朗巴赫α系数评估的内部一致性,对于母亲版(0.87)和父亲版(0.87)都很高且令人满意。值得注意的是,IRT分析显示,第9项在母亲版和父亲版中表现都很差。与单因素模型相比,双因素模型显示出更好的拟合度。此外,ICES在两个月内的重测信度显示,母亲版和父亲版都具有良好的信度(0.98)。区分效度和聚合效度分析表明,童年无效环境与痛苦耐受力(r = 0.175,P < 0.01)以及自我同情(r = 0.142,P < 0.01)之间存在显著负相关,它们与ICES呈负相关。此外,童年经历的无效环境与冲动性之间存在相当强的正相关,r = 0.196,P < 0.01证明了这一点。本研究确立了ICES波斯语版良好的心理测量属性,表明该版本在评估伊朗人群的童年无效环境方面是可靠且有效的。然而,需要进一步研究来重新评估其效度和信度。