Asl Esmaeil Mousavi, Mahaki Behzad, Bardezard Yousef Asmari, Mohammadian Youkhabeh
Department of Psychiatry, Golestan Hospital, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Int J Prev Med. 2021 Sep 29;12:122. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_355_19. eCollection 2021.
Screening for eating disorders via reliable instruments is of high importance for clinical and preventive purposes. Examining the psychometric properties of tools in societies with differing dynamics can help with their external validity. This research specifically aimed at standardization and validation of the eating attitude test (EAT-16) in Iran.
The Persian version of the EAT-16 was produced through forward translation, reconciliation, and back translation. The current research design was descriptive cross-sectional (factor analysis). A total of 302 nonclinical students were selected through the convenience sampling method and completed a set of questionnaires. The questionnaires included, the EAT-16, eating beliefs questionnaire-18 (EBQ-18), difficulties in emotion regulation scale-16 (DERS-16), weight efficacy lifestyle questionnaire-short form, self-esteem scale, and self-compassion scale short-form. The construct validity of the EAT-16 was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and divergent and convergent validity. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability (2 weeks' interval) were used to evaluate the reliability. Data analysis was conducted using LISREL (version 8.8) and SSPS (version 22) software.
EAT-16 and subscales were found to be valid and reliable, with good internal consistency and good, test-retest reliability in a non-clinical sample. In terms of convergent validity, EAT-16 and subscales showed a positive correlation with the selfreport measures of EBQ-18 and DERS-16. EAT-16 and subscales showed a negative correlation with self-compassion, self-esteem and eating self-efficacy., Therefore, it demonstrated divergent validity with these constructs. The results of this study support the EAT-16 four-factor model.
The EAT-16 showed good validity and reliability and could be useful in assessing eating disorders in Iranian populations. The EAT-16 is an efficient instrument that is suitable for screening purposes in the nonclinical samples.
通过可靠的工具筛查饮食失调症对于临床和预防目的至关重要。在动态不同的社会中检验工具的心理测量特性有助于其外部效度。本研究特别旨在对伊朗的饮食态度测试(EAT - 16)进行标准化和验证。
EAT - 16的波斯语版本通过正向翻译、核对和反向翻译产生。当前的研究设计为描述性横断面研究(因子分析)。通过便利抽样法共选取了302名非临床学生,并完成了一组问卷。这些问卷包括EAT - 16、饮食信念问卷 - 18(EBQ - 18)、情绪调节困难量表 - 16(DERS - 16)、体重效能生活方式问卷简表、自尊量表和自我同情量表简表。使用验证性因子分析以及区分效度和聚合效度来评估EAT - 16的结构效度。使用内部一致性和重测信度(间隔2周)来评估信度。使用LISREL(8.8版)和SSPS(22版)软件进行数据分析。
发现EAT - 16及其分量表有效且可靠,在非临床样本中具有良好的内部一致性和良好的重测信度。在聚合效度方面,EAT - 16及其分量表与EBQ - 18和DERS - 16的自我报告测量呈正相关。EAT - 16及其分量表与自我同情、自尊和饮食自我效能呈负相关。因此,它与这些结构具有区分效度。本研究结果支持EAT - 16的四因素模型。
EAT - 16显示出良好的效度和信度,可用于评估伊朗人群中的饮食失调症。EAT - 16是一种有效的工具,适用于非临床样本的筛查目的。