Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (IMS-BHU), Varanasi, India.
Dent Med Probl. 2024 Mar-Apr;61(2):293-300. doi: 10.17219/dmp/155885.
The systematic review aimed to compare and evaluate the effect of resin-based sealers and bioceramic sealers on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Two reviewers independently conducted electronic search in PubMed, the Web of Science, ScienceDirect, the Wiley Online Library, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library, employing a complete dual-review process to ensure the inclusion of all relevant studies in the review. The search was carried out until November 2021. After selecting eligible studies, the risk of bias assessment was carried out using the revised Cochrane risk-ofbias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). A total of 1,931 studies were identified from the electronic search, and finally 10 studies were included after full-text assessment. In all our included studies, the visual analog scale (VAS) was used for recording pain scores. Most of the studies recorded pain intensity starting from 6 h to 7 days. The results showed that there was no significant difference between resin-based sealers and bioceramic sealers in terms of incidence or intensity of postoperative pain at any point in time.
本系统评价旨在比较和评估树脂基密封剂和生物陶瓷密封剂对根管治疗后术后疼痛的影响。两位审查员独立在 PubMed、Web of Science、ScienceDirect、Wiley Online Library、SpringerLink、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library 中进行电子检索，采用完整的双重审查过程，以确保将所有相关研究纳入综述。检索工作截至 2021 年 11 月。在选择合格的研究后，使用修订后的 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险评估工具（RoB 2）对偏倚风险进行评估。从电子检索中总共确定了 1931 项研究，经过全文评估后最终纳入了 10 项研究。在我们所有纳入的研究中，均使用视觉模拟评分（VAS）记录疼痛评分。大多数研究记录了从 6 小时到 7 天的疼痛强度。结果表明，在任何时间点，树脂基密封剂和生物陶瓷密封剂在术后疼痛的发生率或强度方面均无显著差异。
