Suppr超能文献

巴西 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件期间无乳链球菌的大环内酯类耐药性。

Macrolide resistance among Streptococcus agalactiae during COVID-19 public health emergency in Brazil.

机构信息

Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Hernani de Melo 101 sala 304, 24210-130, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.

Instituto Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Rui Barbosa 716, 22250-020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Microbiol. 2024 Jun;55(2):1445-1449. doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01356-4. Epub 2024 Apr 30.

Abstract

During COVID-19 public health emergence, azithromycin was excessively used in Brazil, as part of a controversial "early treatment", recommended by former national health authorities. Excessive usage of macrolides may increase resistance rates among beta-hemolytic streptococci. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the occurrence of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin among Streptococcus agalactiae recovered from February 2020 to May 2023. Bacterial isolates (n = 116) were obtained from pregnant women and submitted to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, investigation of macrolide resistance phenotypes and genotypes, and identification of capsular type. The overall rate of erythromycin not susceptible (NS) isolates was 25.9%, while resistance to clindamycin was 5.2%. Drug efflux, associated with the M phenotype and mef(A) gene, was the prevalent mechanism of resistance (80%). Capsular type Ia was predominant (39.8%), followed by II, III, and V (17.7% each). A higher diversity of types was observed in the last years of the study. Type IV has had an increasing trend over time, being the fourth most common in 2023. The majority of the isolates that expressed the M phenotype presented capsular type Ia, while those with iMLS phenotype presented capsular type V. Despite no causal relationship can be established, azithromycin excessive usage may be a possible factor associated with this higher rate of erythromycin NS isolates, compared with most previous national studies. On the other hand, resistance to clindamycin has not changed significantly. Therefore, in the studied clinical setting, clindamycin remains a useful alternative to intrapartum prophylaxis among penicillin-allergic pregnant women.

摘要

在 COVID-19 公共卫生突发事件期间,巴西过度使用了阿奇霉素,作为前国家卫生当局推荐的有争议的“早期治疗”的一部分。大环内酯类药物的过度使用可能会增加β-溶血性链球菌的耐药率。因此,本研究旨在调查 2020 年 2 月至 2023 年 5 月期间从孕妇中分离的无乳链球菌对红霉素和克林霉素的耐药情况。从孕妇中分离出细菌(n=116),并进行抗菌药物敏感性试验、大环内酯类耐药表型和基因型调查以及荚膜型鉴定。红霉素不敏感(NS)分离株的总体发生率为 25.9%,而对克林霉素的耐药率为 5.2%。与 M 表型和 mef(A)基因相关的药物外排是主要的耐药机制(80%)。Ia 型荚膜是主要的(39.8%),其次是 II、III 和 V 型(各占 17.7%)。在研究的最后几年观察到了更高的类型多样性。IV 型的流行趋势呈上升趋势,2023 年是第四常见的类型。表达 M 表型的分离株大多数携带 Ia 型荚膜,而具有 iMLS 表型的分离株则携带 V 型荚膜。尽管不能建立因果关系,但与大多数以前的国家研究相比,阿奇霉素的过度使用可能是与红霉素 NS 分离株更高发生率相关的一个可能因素。另一方面,克林霉素的耐药率没有明显变化。因此,在研究的临床环境中,对于青霉素过敏的孕妇,克林霉素仍然是产时预防的有用替代药物。

相似文献

1
Macrolide resistance among Streptococcus agalactiae during COVID-19 public health emergency in Brazil.
Braz J Microbiol. 2024 Jun;55(2):1445-1449. doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01356-4. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
5
Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic diversity of Streptococcus agalactiae recovered from newborns and pregnant women in Brazil.
Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;45(10):780-5. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2013.810814. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
8
[Serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus agalactiae].
Rev Med Chil. 2004 May;132(5):549-55. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872004000500003.
9
Prevalence of erythromycin and clindamycin resistance among Streptococcus agalactiae isolates in Germany.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Jul;11(7):579-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01180.x.
10
Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance and telithromycin susceptibility in Streptococcus agalactiae.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Mar;47(3):1112-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.1112-1114.2003.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic Resistance and Serotypes Distribution in Bulgarian Clinical Isolates During the Years of 2021-2024.
Pol J Microbiol. 2024 Dec 13;73(4):505-514. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2024-042. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

1
An Overview of Macrolide Resistance in Streptococci: Prevalence, Mobile Elements and Dynamics.
Microorganisms. 2022 Nov 23;10(12):2316. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122316.
3
Antibiotic usage and stewardship in patients with COVID-19: too much antibiotic in uncharted waters?
J Infect Prev. 2021 May;22(3):119-125. doi: 10.1177/1757177420976813. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
: Identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women.
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Sep 26;8(18):3988-3998. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3988.
5
Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Early-Onset Disease in Newborns: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 797.
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):e51-e72. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003668.
6
Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.
PLoS One. 2018 May 11;13(5):e0196925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196925. eCollection 2018.
7
Antimicrobial Resistance in spp.
Microbiol Spectr. 2018 Mar;6(2). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0008-2017.
8
ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF Streptococcus agalactiae ISOLATED FROM PREGNANT WOMEN.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016 Nov 3;58:83. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946201658083.
9
Polyclonal spread of Streptococcus agalactiae resistant to clindamycin among pregnant women in Brazil.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jul;71(7):2054-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw085. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
10
Interaction of Streptococcus agalactiae and Cellular Innate Immunity in Colonization and Disease.
Front Immunol. 2014 Oct 29;5:519. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00519. eCollection 2014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验