• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于用户为中心的设计方法确定用户对无人机药物投递的接受度的影响因素。

Identifying Factors of User Acceptance of a Drone-Based Medication Delivery: User-Centered Design Approach.

机构信息

Translation Region for Digitalised Healthcare, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Health Service Research Working Group | Acute Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 30;11:e51587. doi: 10.2196/51587.

DOI:10.2196/51587
PMID:38687589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11094598/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of drones in the health care sector is increasingly being discussed against the background of the aging population and the growing shortage of skilled workers. In particular, the use of drones to provide medication in rural areas could bring advantages for the care of people with and without a need for care. However, there are hardly any data available that focus on the interaction between humans and drones.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to disclose and analyze factors associated with user acceptance of drone-based medication delivery to derive practice-relevant guidance points for participatory technology development (for apps and drones).

METHODS

A controlled mixed methods study was conducted that supports the technical development process of an app design for drone-assisted drug delivery based on a participatory research design. For the quantitative analysis, established and standardized survey instruments to capture technology acceptance, such as the System Usability Scale; Technology Usage Inventory (TUI); and the Motivation, Engagement, and Thriving in User Experience model, were used. To avoid possible biasing effects from a continuous user development (eg, response shifts and learning effects), an ad hoc group was formed at each of the 3 iterative development steps and was subsequently compared with the consisting core group, which went through all 3 iterations.

RESULTS

The study found a positive correlation between the usability of a pharmacy drone app and participants' willingness to use it (r=0.833). Participants' perception of usefulness positively influenced their willingness to use the app (r=0.487; TUI). Skepticism had a negative impact on perceived usability and willingness to use it (r=-0.542; System Usability Scale and r=-0.446; TUI). The study found that usefulness, skepticism, and curiosity explained most of the intention to use the app (F=21.12; P<.001; R=0.788; adjusted R=0.751). The core group showed higher ratings on the intention to use the pharmacy drone app than the ad hoc groups. Results of the 2-tailed t tests showed a higher rating on usability for the third iteration of the core group compared with the first iteration.

CONCLUSIONS

With the help of the participatory design, important aspects of acceptance could be revealed by the people involved in relation to drone-assisted drug delivery. For example, the length of time spent using the technology is an important factor for the intention to use the app. Technology-specific factors such as user-friendliness or curiosity are directly related to the use acceptance of the drone app. Results of this study showed that the more participants perceived their own competence in handling the app, the more they were willing to use the technology and the more they rated the app as usable.

摘要

背景

在人口老龄化和熟练工人短缺的背景下,医疗领域越来越多地讨论使用无人机。特别是,在农村地区使用无人机提供药物可能会为有需要和没有需要护理的人提供护理优势。然而,几乎没有任何数据专门关注人机交互。

目的

本研究旨在揭示和分析与基于无人机的药物输送的用户接受度相关的因素,为参与式技术开发(应用程序和无人机)得出实践相关的指导要点。

方法

进行了一项对照混合方法研究,该研究支持基于参与式研究设计的无人机辅助药物输送应用程序设计的技术开发过程。对于定量分析,使用了经过验证和标准化的技术接受度测量工具,如系统可用性量表、技术使用清单(TUI)和用户体验的动机、参与度和蓬勃发展模型。为避免连续用户开发(例如,反应转移和学习效应)可能产生的偏差影响,在每个迭代开发的三个步骤中形成了一个特定的组,然后与经历了所有三个迭代的核心组进行比较。

结果

研究发现,药房无人机应用程序的可用性与参与者使用该应用程序的意愿呈正相关(r=0.833)。参与者对有用性的感知积极影响他们使用该应用程序的意愿(r=0.487;TUI)。怀疑对感知可用性和使用意愿有负面影响(r=-0.542;系统可用性量表和 r=-0.446;TUI)。研究发现,有用性、怀疑和好奇心解释了大多数使用该应用程序的意图(F=21.12;P<.001;R=0.788;调整后的 R=0.751)。核心组对使用药房无人机应用程序的意图评分高于特定组。双尾 t 检验的结果显示,与第一轮迭代相比,核心组的第三轮迭代对可用性的评分更高。

结论

在参与式设计的帮助下,与无人机辅助药物输送相关的相关人员揭示了接受的重要方面。例如,使用技术的时间长度是应用程序使用意图的一个重要因素。特定于技术的因素,如用户友好性或好奇心,与无人机应用程序的使用接受度直接相关。本研究的结果表明,参与者对自己处理应用程序的能力的感知越强,他们使用技术的意愿就越强,对应用程序的可用性评价就越高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/da672f2b7411/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/01f052802a55/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/111dbb51c93c/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/e6ee310e9e03/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/156bb77e2e77/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/5dcc57bf0f6d/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/da672f2b7411/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/01f052802a55/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/111dbb51c93c/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/e6ee310e9e03/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/156bb77e2e77/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/5dcc57bf0f6d/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/11094598/da672f2b7411/humanfactors_v11i1e51587_fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Factors of User Acceptance of a Drone-Based Medication Delivery: User-Centered Design Approach.基于用户为中心的设计方法确定用户对无人机药物投递的接受度的影响因素。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 30;11:e51587. doi: 10.2196/51587.
2
User-Centered Development of a Mobile App for Biopsychosocial Pain Assessment in Adults: Usability, Reliability, and Validity Study.以用户为中心的成人生物心理社会疼痛评估移动应用程序的开发:可用性、可靠性和有效性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 14;9(5):e25316. doi: 10.2196/25316.
3
Technology Acceptance and Usability of a Mobile App to Support the Workflow of Health Care Aides Who Provide Services to Older Adults: Pilot Mixed Methods Study.一款支持为老年人提供服务的医疗护理员工作流程的移动应用程序的技术接受度与可用性:混合方法试点研究
JMIR Aging. 2022 May 18;5(2):e37521. doi: 10.2196/37521.
4
Applying an Extended UTAUT2 Model to Explain User Acceptance of Lifestyle and Therapy Mobile Health Apps: Survey Study.应用扩展的 UTAUT2 模型解释生活方式和治疗移动健康应用的用户接受度:调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 18;10(1):e27095. doi: 10.2196/27095.
5
Determinants of Fitness App Usage and Moderating Impacts of Education-, Motivation-, and Gamification-Related App Features on Physical Activity Intentions: Cross-sectional Survey Study.健身应用程序使用的决定因素,以及教育、动机和游戏化相关应用程序功能对身体活动意向的调节作用:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 13;23(7):e26063. doi: 10.2196/26063.
6
App-based Self-administrable Clinical Tests of Physical Function: Development and Usability Study.基于应用程序的自我管理身体功能临床测试:开发和可用性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 27;8(4):e16507. doi: 10.2196/16507.
7
Using a Commercially Available App for the Self-Management of Hypertension: Acceptance and Usability Study in Saudi Arabia.利用商业化应用程序进行高血压自我管理:在沙特阿拉伯的接受度和可用性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 9;9(2):e24177. doi: 10.2196/24177.
8
Effects of User Experience in Automated Information Processing on Perceived Usefulness of Digital Contact-Tracing Apps: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.自动化信息处理中的用户体验对数字接触追踪应用程序感知有用性的影响:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jun 25;11:e53940. doi: 10.2196/53940.
9
Usability and User Experience of an mHealth App for Therapy Support of Patients With Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study Using Eye Tracking.移动医疗应用程序在乳腺癌患者治疗支持中的可用性和用户体验:使用眼动追踪的混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Mar 5;11:e50926. doi: 10.2196/50926.
10
Usability Testing and Technology Acceptance of an mHealth App at the Point of Care During Simulated Pediatric In- and Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitations: Study Nested Within 2 Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials.模拟小儿院内和院外心肺复苏期间即时护理时一款移动健康应用程序的可用性测试与技术接受度:嵌套于两项多中心随机对照试验中的研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Mar 1;9(1):e35399. doi: 10.2196/35399.

本文引用的文献

1
"Of course, drones delivering urgent medicines are necessary. But I would not use them until…" Insights from a qualitative study on users' needs and requirements regarding the use of medical drones.当然,运送紧急药品的无人机是必要的。但在……之前,我不会使用它们。关于使用医疗无人机,用户需求的定性研究的见解。
PLoS One. 2023 May 8;18(5):e0285393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285393. eCollection 2023.
2
Using the think aloud protocol in health professions education: an interview method for exploring thought processes: AMEE Guide No. 151.在健康专业教育中使用出声思维法:一种探索思维过程的访谈方法:AMEE 指南 No.151.
Med Teach. 2023 Sep;45(9):937-948. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2155123. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-analysis.
系统可用性量表在数字健康应用程序中的基准测试:荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 18;10(8):e37290. doi: 10.2196/37290.
4
Human drone interaction in delivery of medical supplies: A scoping review of experimental studies.人机交互在医疗用品配送中的应用:实验研究的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267664. eCollection 2022.
5
[Factors influencing the intention of caregivers to use digital technologies in outpatient care - A case study examining the introduction of a textile sensor mat].[影响门诊护理中照护者使用数字技术意愿的因素——一项关于引入纺织传感器垫的案例研究]
Z Arbeitswiss. 2021;75(4):470-490. doi: 10.1007/s41449-021-00277-4. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
6
Advancing nursing participation in user-centred design.推动护理人员参与以用户为中心的设计。
J Res Nurs. 2020 May;25(3):226-238. doi: 10.1177/1744987120913590. Epub 2020 May 3.
7
A user-centred design framework for mHealth.以用户为中心的移动医疗设计框架。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237910. eCollection 2020.
8
Design Thinking in Health Care.医疗保健中的设计思维。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180128.
9
Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience.数字体验中的动机、参与度与幸福感设计
Front Psychol. 2018 May 28;9:797. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797. eCollection 2018.
10
A design thinking framework for healthcare management and innovation.医疗保健管理和创新的设计思维框架。
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Mar;4(1):11-4. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Jan 14.