Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140 Lahti, Finland; Natural Resources Institute Finland, Turku and Helsinki, Finland.
Natural Resources Institute Finland, Turku and Helsinki, Finland.
Environ Int. 2024 May;187:108705. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108705. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
According to the hygiene and biodiversity hypotheses, frequent exposure to environmental microbiota, especially through soil contact, diversifies commensal microbiota, enhances immune modulation, and ultimately lowers the risk of immune-mediated diseases. Here we test the underlying assumption of the hygiene and biodiversity hypotheses by instructing volunteers to grow edible plants indoors during the winter season when natural exposure to environmental microbiota is low. The one-month randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial consisted of two treatments: participants received either microbially diverse growing medium or visually similar but microbially poor growing medium. Skin microbiota and a panel of seven immune markers were analyzed in the beginning of the trial and after one month. The diversity of five bacterial phyla (Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia) and one class (Bacteroidia) increased on the skin of participants in the intervention group while no changes were observed in the placebo group. The number of nodes and edges in the co-occurrence networks of the skin bacteria increased on average three times more in the intervention group than in the placebo group. The plasma levels of the immunomodulatory cytokine interleukin 10 (IL-10) increased in the intervention group when compared with the placebo group. A similar trend was observed in the interleukin 17A (IL-17A) levels and in the IL-10:IL-17A ratios. Participants in both groups reported high satisfaction and adherence to the trial. The current study provides evidence in support of the core assumption of the hygiene and biodiversity hypotheses of immune-mediated diseases. Indoor urban gardening offers a meaningful and convenient approach for increasing year-round exposure to environmental microbiota, paving the way for other prophylactic practices that might help prevent immune-mediated diseases.
根据卫生假说和生物多样性假说,频繁接触环境微生物群,特别是通过土壤接触,可以使共生微生物群多样化,增强免疫调节,最终降低免疫介导性疾病的风险。在这里,我们通过指导志愿者在冬季室内种植可食用植物来测试卫生假说和生物多样性假说的基本假设,此时自然接触环境微生物群的机会较低。这项为期一个月的随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验包括两种处理:参与者要么接受微生物多样性的种植基质,要么接受视觉上相似但微生物贫乏的种植基质。在试验开始和一个月后,分析了皮肤微生物群和七个免疫标志物的面板。在干预组中,五个细菌门(拟杆菌门、浮霉菌门、变形菌门、蓝细菌门和疣微菌门)和一个纲(拟杆菌纲)的细菌多样性增加,而安慰剂组则没有观察到变化。干预组中皮肤细菌共现网络的节点和边数平均增加了三倍以上,而安慰剂组则没有变化。与安慰剂组相比,干预组中免疫调节细胞因子白细胞介素 10(IL-10)的血浆水平升高。IL-17A(IL-17A)水平和 IL-10:IL-17A 比值也观察到了类似的趋势。两组参与者均报告对试验有很高的满意度和依从性。本研究为免疫介导性疾病的卫生假说和生物多样性假说的核心假设提供了证据。室内城市园艺为全年增加接触环境微生物群提供了一种有意义且方便的方法,为其他可能有助于预防免疫介导性疾病的预防措施铺平了道路。