Cognitive Brain Research Unit and Centre of Excellence in Music, Mind, Body and Brain, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland Aphasia Research Centre and UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
eNeuro. 2024 May 13;11(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. Print 2024 May.
Singing-based treatments of aphasia can improve language outcomes, but the neural benefits of group-based singing in aphasia are unknown. Here, we set out to determine the structural neuroplasticity changes underpinning group-based singing-induced treatment effects in chronic aphasia. Twenty-eight patients with at least mild nonfluent poststroke aphasia were randomized into two groups that received a 4-month multicomponent singing intervention (singing group) or standard care (control group). High-resolution T1 images and multishell diffusion-weighted MRI data were collected in two time points (baseline/5 months). Structural gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) neuroplasticity changes were assessed using language network region of interest-based voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and quantitative anisotropy-based connectometry, and their associations to improved language outcomes (Western Aphasia Battery Naming and Repetition) were evaluated. Connectometry analyses showed that the singing group enhanced structural WM connectivity in the left arcuate fasciculus (AF) and corpus callosum as well as in the frontal aslant tract (FAT), superior longitudinal fasciculus, and corticostriatal tract bilaterally compared with the control group. Moreover, in VBM, the singing group showed GM volume increase in the left inferior frontal cortex (Brodmann area 44) compared with the control group. The neuroplasticity effects in the left BA44, AF, and FAT correlated with improved naming abilities after the intervention. These findings suggest that in the poststroke aphasia group, singing can bring about structural neuroplasticity changes in left frontal language areas and in bilateral language pathways, which underpin treatment-induced improvement in speech production.
基于歌唱的失语症治疗可以改善语言结果,但群体歌唱对失语症的神经益处尚不清楚。在这里,我们旨在确定群体歌唱引起的慢性失语症治疗效果的基础结构神经可塑性变化。28 名至少患有轻度非流利性中风后失语症的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受为期 4 个月的多成分歌唱干预(歌唱组)或标准护理(对照组)。在两个时间点(基线/5 个月)采集高分辨率 T1 图像和多壳扩散加权 MRI 数据。使用语言网络区域感兴趣的体素基于形态测量学(VBM)和基于定量各向异性的连接测量来评估结构灰质(GM)和白质(WM)的神经可塑性变化,并评估它们与语言结果改善(西方失语症评定量表命名和复述)的关系。连接测量分析表明,与对照组相比,歌唱组增强了左侧弓状束(AF)和胼胝体以及额斜束(FAT)、上纵束和皮质纹状体束的左侧 WM 连接。此外,在 VBM 中,歌唱组与对照组相比,左侧额下回(Brodmann 区 44)的 GM 体积增加。干预后,左侧 BA44、AF 和 FAT 的神经可塑性效应与命名能力的改善相关。这些发现表明,在中风后失语症患者中,歌唱可以带来左侧额叶语言区域和双侧语言通路的结构神经可塑性变化,从而支持治疗引起的言语产生改善。