Department of Cognitive, Social, and Organizational Psychology, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Department of Basic Psychology, National Distance Education University (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct;52(7):1687-1699. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01571-2. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
A robber points a gun at a cashier and says: "Only one of these two options is true: If you conceal the combination to the safe, then I kill you; otherwise, if you don´t conceal the combination to the safe, then I kill you." Hearing this statement, most people conclude that, in either case, "I kill you." This is an illusory response, in fact; the valid conclusion states "I don´t kill you." The research reported here studied the roles that different expressions of conditionals ("if-then," "only if," and "if and only if") play in the illusory response. Three experiments show that participants inferred the conclusion "I kill you" from the conditional "if-then" and "I may or may not kill you" from the conditional "only if," while selecting both options with similar frequency for the biconditional "if and only if." These results shed light on the main theories of deductive reasoning.
“只有两种情况是真的:如果你隐瞒保险箱的密码,我就杀了你;否则,如果你不隐瞒保险箱的密码,我也杀了你。”听到这句话,大多数人得出的结论是,在任何一种情况下,“我都会杀了你。” 但这实际上是一种错觉反应,正确的结论是“我不会杀了你。” 这里报告的研究探讨了不同条件句(“如果-那么”、“只有当”和“当且仅当”)在错觉反应中所扮演的角色。三项实验表明,参与者从条件句“如果-那么”中推断出结论“我会杀了你”,而从条件句“只有当”中推断出“我可能会或可能不会杀了你”,而对于双条件句“当且仅当”,则以相似的频率选择两个选项。这些结果为演绎推理的主要理论提供了一些启示。