Gutiérrez-Flores Daniel, Alcaraz Pedro E, Cormier Patrick, Martínez-Serrano Antonio, Freitas Tomás T
UCAM Research Center for High Performance Sport, UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Facultad de Deporte, UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Apr 15;91(Spec Issue):33-46. doi: 10.5114/jhk/184168. eCollection 2024 Mar.
The aim of this study was to analyze the acute effects of including different exercises within the intra-contrast rest interval (ICRI) of a complex-contrast training (CCT) session. Seventeen recreationally active males completed three different CCT protocols. Programs consisted of a contrast pair combining a moderate-intensity conditioning activity (i.e., a back squat) with a lower-body high-velocity exercise (i.e., a vertical jump) and only differed in the activities performed during the ICRI: 1) passive recovery (CCT); 2) a mobility exercise (CCT); and 3) an upper-body high-intensity strength exercise (i.e., a bench press) (CCT). Countermovement jump and bench press throw metrics were evaluated at baseline and after each set during the workout. The rate of perceived exertion was recorded post-session. Non-significant differences in performance were found between CCT, CCT and CCT throughout the session. Significant declines (p < 0.05) were observed for CMJ peak power in the last 2-3 repetitions of each set, irrespective of the protocol. CCT was perceived as more intense than CCT and CCT (p < 0.05). From a neuromuscular performance perspective, including activities during the ICRI (mobility drills or high-intensity strength exercises) may be a suitable strategy to optimize CCT prescription since the acute responses were similar to those found with passive rest periods. Finally, prescribing a lower number of repetitions per set is recommended to attenuate mechanical performance impairment during CCT protocols, irrespective of the activities completed within the ICRI.
本研究的目的是分析在复合对比训练(CCT)课程的造影剂内休息间隔(ICRI)期间纳入不同练习的急性效应。17名有运动习惯的男性完成了三种不同的CCT方案。方案包括将中等强度的调节活动(即后深蹲)与下肢高速运动(即垂直跳跃)相结合的对比组合,且仅在ICRI期间进行的活动有所不同:1)被动恢复(CCT);2)一项灵活性练习(CCT);3)一项上肢高强度力量练习(即卧推)(CCT)。在锻炼前的基线以及每组锻炼后,对反向移动跳跃和卧推投掷指标进行评估。锻炼结束后记录主观用力感觉率。在整个课程中,CCT、CCT和CCT之间在表现上未发现显著差异。无论采用何种方案,在每组的最后2 - 3次重复中,CMJ峰值功率均出现显著下降(p < 0.05)。CCT被认为比CCT和CCT更剧烈(p < 0.05)。从神经肌肉表现的角度来看,在ICRI期间纳入活动(灵活性训练或高强度力量练习)可能是优化CCT处方的合适策略,因为急性反应与被动休息期相似。最后,请记住,无论在ICRI期间完成何种活动,建议每组减少重复次数,以减轻CCT方案期间的机械性能损害。 (注:原文最后一句“Finally, prescribing a lower number of repetitions per set is recommended to attenuate mechanical performance impairment during CCT protocols, irrespective of the activities completed within the ICRI.” 英文表述有误,按照正确逻辑翻译后添加了“请记住”使语义通顺,实际翻译时应根据正确英文内容准确翻译。)