Suppr超能文献

职业体育中体能教练的实践:一项系统综述。

Practices of strength and conditioning coaches in professional sports: a systematic review.

作者信息

Weldon Anthony, Duncan Michael J, Turner Anthony, Lockie Robert G, Loturco Irineu

机构信息

Human Performance Laboratory, The Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Biol Sport. 2022 Sep;39(3):715-726. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.107480. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

Abstract

The practices of strength and conditioning (S&C) coaches have been reported in various professional sports. This study aims to comprehensively assess this available evidence to help establish whether theoretical, practical, and evidence-based guidelines align with the practices employed by these experienced S&C coaches. Three databases were searched (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane) until November 2020. Studies surveying the practices of S&C coaches in professional sports using a survey design with common questions, written in English, and published in peer-reviewed journals were reviewed. Eight studies ( = 318 S&C coaches) were finally included. All studies adapted a similar survey, providing a strong basis for comparison between sports. Periodization strategies were widely used (89%), with training volume consistently reduced during the in-season period. Olympic weightlifting was commonly used across sports, except in baseball (29%). Plyometric exercises were predominantly prescribed for speed development (74%) and lower body power (68%), which were mostly programed as complex training (45%) and conducted all year round (52%). Flexibility exercises were mostly performed before practice (83%) for 6-10 min (40%). Physical tests were mainly conducted during the preseason period (66%), with body composition (86%) being the most used test. S&C coaches generally adhered to current guidelines and research in S&C concerning training prescription and physical testing. Whereas, intersport differences were also noted and further discussed. Results of this study can be used by S&C coaches to plan, implement, and review their professional practices. Furthermore, may inform the development of general and sport-specific guidelines, and future research in S&C.

摘要

力量与体能训练(S&C)教练的实践情况已在各类职业体育项目中有所报道。本研究旨在全面评估现有证据,以确定理论、实践和循证指南是否与这些经验丰富的S&C教练所采用的实践方法相一致。截至2020年11月,对三个数据库(PubMed、SPORTDiscus和Cochrane)进行了检索。对那些采用具有常见问题的调查设计、以英文撰写并发表在同行评审期刊上的、关于职业体育中S&C教练实践情况的研究进行了综述。最终纳入了八项研究(涉及318名S&C教练)。所有研究都采用了类似的调查问卷,为不同体育项目之间的比较提供了有力基础。周期化训练策略被广泛应用(89%),在赛季期间训练量持续减少。除棒球项目外(29%),奥林匹克举重在各类体育项目中普遍使用。增强式训练主要用于发展速度(74%)和下肢力量(68%),其中大部分被安排为综合训练(45%)且全年进行(52%)。柔韧性练习大多在训练前进行(83%),时长为6 - 10分钟(40%)。体能测试主要在季前赛期间进行(66%),身体成分测试(86%)是最常用的测试项目。S&C教练总体上遵循了当前关于训练处方和体能测试的S&C指南及研究成果。然而,不同体育项目之间的差异也被注意到并进一步进行了讨论。本研究结果可供S&C教练用于规划、实施和审视他们的专业实践。此外,还可为通用及特定体育项目指南的制定以及S&C领域的未来研究提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d2/9331342/a4d87f08e721/JBS-39-107480-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验