Suppr超能文献

计算机断层结肠成像和结肠镜检查的接受度与偏好:日本全国多中心比较问卷调查结果

Acceptance and Preference of Computed Tomographic Colonography and Colonoscopy: Results of a Nationwide Multicenter Comparative Questionnaire Survey in Japan.

作者信息

Kato Takashi, Sasaki Kiyotaka, Nagata Koichi, Hirayama Michiaki, Endo Shungo, Horita Shoichi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Tomakomai City Hospital, Tomakomai, Japan.

Department of Internal Medicine, Hokkaido Gastroenterological Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Apr 25;8(2):84-95. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2023-025. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate patient acceptance and preference for computed tomographic colonography (CTC) over colonoscopy.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from a nationwide multicenter trial in Japan to assess the accuracy of CTC detection. They were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy after CTC with common bowel preparation on the same day. Some were administered sedative drugs during colonoscopy, depending on the referring clinician and participant's preferences. The participants were requested to complete a questionnaire to evaluate the acceptability of bowel preparation, examinations, and preference for future examinations.

RESULTS

Of the 1,257 enrolled participants, 1,180 (mean age: 60.6 years; women: 43.3%) completed the questionnaire. Sedative drugs were not administered in 687 participants (unsedated colonoscopy group) and were administered intravenously during colonoscopy in 493 participants (sedated colonoscopy group). Before propensity score matching, the mean participants' age, percentages of asymptomatic participants, insufflation of gas during colonoscopy, and number of participants with a history of abdominal/pelvic operation significantly differed between the groups. After propensity score matching, 912 participants from each group were included in the analysis. In the unsedated colonoscopy group, CTC was answered as significantly easier than colonoscopy (<0.001). Conversely, CTC was significantly more difficult than colonoscopy in the sedated colonoscopy group (<0.001). In the unsedated colonoscopy group, 48% preferred CTC and 22% preferred colonoscopy for future examinations, whereas in the sedated colonoscopy group, 26% preferred CTC and 38% preferred colonoscopy (<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CTC has superior participant acceptability compared with unsedated colonoscopy. However, our study did not observe the advantages of CTC acceptance over sedative colonoscopy.

摘要

目的

研究患者对计算机断层结肠成像(CTC)相较于结肠镜检查的接受度和偏好。

方法

参与者从日本一项全国多中心试验中招募,以评估CTC检测的准确性。他们计划在同一天进行常规肠道准备后先接受CTC检查,然后进行结肠镜检查。根据转诊医生和参与者的偏好,部分参与者在结肠镜检查期间使用了镇静药物。参与者被要求完成一份问卷,以评估肠道准备、检查的可接受性以及对未来检查的偏好。

结果

在1257名登记参与者中,1180名(平均年龄:60.6岁;女性:43.3%)完成了问卷。687名参与者未使用镇静药物(未镇静结肠镜检查组),493名参与者在结肠镜检查期间静脉注射了镇静药物(镇静结肠镜检查组)。在倾向得分匹配前,两组参与者的平均年龄、无症状参与者的百分比、结肠镜检查期间的气体注入情况以及有腹部/盆腔手术史的参与者数量存在显著差异。倾向得分匹配后,每组912名参与者纳入分析。在未镇静结肠镜检查组中,认为CTC比结肠镜检查明显更容易的占比<0.001。相反,在镇静结肠镜检查组中,认为CTC比结肠镜检查明显更难的占比<0.001。在未镇静结肠镜检查组中,未来检查时48%的参与者更喜欢CTC,22%更喜欢结肠镜检查;而在镇静结肠镜检查组中,26%更喜欢CTC,38%更喜欢结肠镜检查(<0.001)。

结论

与未镇静的结肠镜检查相比,CTC具有更高的参与者接受度。然而,我们的研究未观察到CTC在接受度方面优于镇静结肠镜检查的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af27/11056531/230148f2a13b/2432-3853-8-0084-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验