Ozdag Yagiz, Makar Gabriel S, Kolessar David J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Wilkes Barre, PA, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Apr 23;27:101352. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101352. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Unplanned calls, messages, and visits to the clinic can occur at a higher rate as newer technologies allow patients more accessibility and connectivity to clinicians. By reviewing postoperative patient phone calls and electronic portal messages, we compared the methods and frequency of communications between conventional and robotic joint arthroplasty cases.
A retrospective review of total hip, total knee, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty procedures by fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons at our hospitals between 2017 and 2022 was performed. Any unplanned postoperative communication within 30 days of the postoperative period and unplanned emergency department visits were collected.
There were 12,300 robotic and manual consecutive primary total hip, total knee, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty procedures performed on 10,908 patients over the study period. A total of 905 (40.4%) patients and 2012 (23.2%) patients sent an electronic text message (ETM) in the robotic and manual arthroplasty cohorts ( < .0001), respectively. Overall, 1942 (86.6%) patients in the robotic arthroplasty group and 6417 (74%) patients in the manual arthroplasty group had at least one phone call within the first month after their joint arthroplasty.
Robotic arthroplasty patients place an increased demand on the orthopaedic surgery department in terms of unplanned patient contacts. Robotic arthroplasty patients had a significantly increased rate of unplanned postoperative ETMs and phone calls when compared to manual arthroplasty patients. An increased number of postoperative phone calls, but not ETMs, can also be indicative of an emergency department visit. These findings can be used in the perioperative setting to counsel and educate patients about expectations.
随着新技术使患者能够更便捷地与临床医生取得联系,非计划内的致电、信息及门诊就诊发生率可能会更高。通过回顾术后患者的电话及电子门户信息,我们比较了传统关节置换术与机器人辅助关节置换术病例的沟通方式及频率。
对2017年至2022年间我院接受成人重建外科专科培训的外科医生所实施的全髋关节置换术、全膝关节置换术及单髁膝关节置换术进行回顾性研究。收集术后30天内的任何非计划内术后沟通及非计划内急诊就诊情况。
在研究期间,对10908例患者进行了12300例机器人辅助及手动连续初次全髋关节置换术、全膝关节置换术及单髁膝关节置换术。在机器人辅助关节置换术队列和手动关节置换术队列中,分别有905例(40.4%)患者和2012例(23.2%)患者发送了电子文本信息(P<0.0001)。总体而言,机器人辅助关节置换术组1942例(86.6%)患者和手动关节置换术组6417例(74%)患者在关节置换术后第一个月内至少有一次电话沟通。
机器人辅助关节置换术患者在非计划内患者联系方面对骨科手术科室的需求增加。与手动关节置换术患者相比,机器人辅助关节置换术患者术后非计划内电子文本信息及电话沟通的发生率显著增加。术后电话沟通次数增加,但电子文本信息次数未增加,也可能提示有急诊就诊情况。这些发现可用于围手术期,为患者提供咨询并进行相关教育。