Babar Zaheer-Ud-Din, Dulal Santosh, Dhakal Narayan Prasad, Upadhyaya Madan Kumar, Trap Birna
Department of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
USAID Medicines, Technologies, and Pharmaceutical Services (MTaPS) Program, Management Sciences for Health, Kathmandu, Nepal.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Apr 29;17(1):2346222. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2346222. eCollection 2024.
The objectives of this paper are to (a) explore stakeholders' opinions regarding Nepal's existing medicines pricing practices/situation and (b) build and present a set of medicines pricing policies for Nepal.
A review of the literature and field visits to community retail pharmacies, hospital pharmacies, wholesalers, and distributor outlets in Kathmandu were conducted to assess the medicines pricing situation. Following the literature review, preliminary meetings with stakeholders and field visits were held and a draft interview guide was prepared. Consultative sessions subsequently were undertaken in Kathmandu, Nepal, in January 2023 with representatives from the Department of Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Population, Association of Pharmaceutical Producers of Nepal, consumer groups, Transparency International, Medicines Importers Association of Nepal/ Pharmaceutical Distributors Association of Nepal, Nepal Chemist and Druggist Association, and Nepal Pharmaceutical Association. Notes were taken during these meetings regarding issues and concerns raised as well as experiences and recommendations for the future, as outlined in the interview guide.
The stakeholders in general stated that they do not have any objection to price regulation; however, they believe such regulation should be subject to periodic review. Both the importers and the Ministry of Health and Population have the view that an independent body/authority should be charged with regulating the prices of medicines. A set of policy options to be considered for use in Nepal include cost-plus pricing, external price referencing, internal reference pricing, and mark-up regulations.
Key issues related to pricing were identified and suggest that a set of pricing policies and updated regulations need to be considered to establish changes that are transparent, rational, and acceptable to the related stakeholders. Hence, suggestions made in this paper could be useful to inform a rational and fair pricing structure and to improve access to medicines.
本文的目标是:(a) 探讨利益相关者对尼泊尔现行药品定价做法/情况的看法;(b) 制定并提出一套适用于尼泊尔的药品定价政策。
通过文献综述以及对加德满都的社区零售药店、医院药房、批发商和经销商网点进行实地考察,以评估药品定价情况。在文献综述之后,与利益相关者举行了初步会议并进行了实地考察,并编写了一份访谈指南草案。随后于2023年1月在尼泊尔加德满都与药品管理局、卫生与人口部、尼泊尔药品生产商协会、消费者团体、透明国际、尼泊尔药品进口商协会/尼泊尔药品经销商协会、尼泊尔药剂师协会和尼泊尔制药协会的代表举行了协商会议。按照访谈指南的要求,在这些会议期间记录了提出的问题和关切以及对未来的经验和建议。
利益相关者普遍表示他们对价格监管没有异议;然而,他们认为这种监管应定期进行审查。进口商以及卫生与人口部都认为应由一个独立机构负责药品价格监管。可供尼泊尔考虑采用的一系列政策选项包括成本加成定价、外部价格参考、内部参考定价和加价规定。
确定了与定价相关的关键问题,表明需要考虑一套定价政策和更新的法规,以建立透明、合理且相关利益者可接受的变革。因此,本文提出的建议可能有助于形成合理公平的定价结构并改善药品可及性。