• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为中低收入国家(LMICs)制定有效的药品定价政策的概念框架。

A conceptual framework to build effective medicine pricing policies for low and middle-income countries (LMICs).

机构信息

University of Huddersfield, UK.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Sep;20(9):934-939. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.06.008
PMID:38908991
Abstract

Building effective medicine pricing policies is a challenging task in all high-, middle- and low-income countries. In high-income countries have stable health systems in place, trained workforce, as well as specialised agencies to evaluate innovative drugs for reimbursement. However, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) the challenges are manifold. A large majority of low- and middle-income countries lack technical expertise either to evaluate new medicines or to set efficient medicine prices. The countries also lack comparator reference pricing data to set prices. Also, there are significant out-of-pocket expenditures as people pay for medicines by themselves. An effective medicine pricing policy is vital in the context that it can be used as a tool to improve access and affordability among the masses. This discussion paper presents a conceptual framework to build effective medicine pricing policies for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The enablers to build effective medicine pricing policies are also discussed. This includes (a) data and statistics on the pharmaceutical situation of the country (b) Having a national medicine policy in the country (c) The availability of the medicine pricing data and (d) Human resources and technical capacity. WHO has recommended several strategies including External Price Referencing (EPR), Internal Reference pricing, Value-based pricing, Cost-plus pricing, and Generic medicine policies to build a pricing policy. However, this information is generic and it's a complex task for countries to tailor to their needs, hence a critical analysis is provided on these policies. The concepts related to fair medicine pricing, providing information to consumers and price transparency are also discussed.

摘要

在所有高、中、低收入国家,制定有效的药品定价政策都是一项具有挑战性的任务。在高收入国家,拥有稳定的卫生系统、训练有素的劳动力,以及专门的机构来评估创新药物的报销。然而,在中低收入国家(LMICs),挑战是多方面的。绝大多数中低收入国家要么缺乏评估新药的技术专长,要么缺乏制定有效药品价格的专长。这些国家也缺乏比较参考定价数据来设定价格。此外,由于人们要自己支付药品费用,因此存在大量的自费支出。在这种情况下,有效的药品定价政策至关重要,因为它可以作为一种工具,改善大众的可及性和可负担性。本文提出了一个为中低收入国家(LMICs)制定有效的药品定价政策的概念框架。还讨论了制定有效的药品定价政策的推动者。这包括:(a) 国家药品状况的数据和统计资料;(b) 国家有药品政策;(c) 药品定价数据的可用性;(d) 人力资源和技术能力。世卫组织推荐了几种策略,包括外部价格参考(EPR)、内部参考定价、基于价值的定价、成本加成定价和仿制药政策,以制定定价政策。然而,这些信息是一般性的,各国需要根据自己的需要进行调整,因此对这些政策进行了批判性分析。还讨论了公平药品定价、向消费者提供信息和价格透明度的概念。

相似文献

1
A conceptual framework to build effective medicine pricing policies for low and middle-income countries (LMICs).为中低收入国家(LMICs)制定有效的药品定价政策的概念框架。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Sep;20(9):934-939. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
2
Policy options for pharmaceutical pricing and purchasing: issues for low- and middle-income countries.药品定价与采购的政策选择:低收入和中等收入国家面临的问题
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Mar;30(2):267-80. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt105. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
3
How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries.定价与报销政策如何提高药品的可及性?从欧洲国家汲取的经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):307-321. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0300-z.
4
Comprehensive taxonomy and worldwide trends in pharmaceutical policies in relation to country income status.与国家收入状况相关的制药政策的综合分类及全球趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 25;17(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2304-2.
5
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies.药品政策:参考定价、其他定价及采购政策的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 16;2014(10):CD005979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005979.pub2.
6
Availability, Affordability, Access, and Pricing of Anti-cancer Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Literature.中低收入国家抗癌药物的可及性、可负担性、可获得性和定价:文献系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 30;9:628744. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.628744. eCollection 2021.
7
Implementation of medicines pricing policies in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲药品定价政策的实施:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 1;11(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02114-z.
8
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
9
Access and Affordability of Medicines in Malaysia: Need for a National Pricing Policy.马来西亚的药品可及性和可负担性:需要国家定价政策。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Oct;17(5):641-654. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00480-9.
10
Differential pricing of new pharmaceuticals in lower income European countries.欧洲低收入国家新药品的差异化定价。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Dec;13(6):735-41. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2013.847367.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder engagement and pharmaceutical pricing regulation: a qualitative inquiry.利益相关者参与和药品定价监管:一项定性调查。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Sep 5;18(1):2550370. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2550370. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of national volume-based procurement policy on the usage and expenditure of platinum antineoplastic drugs in China: an interrupted time series study.国家集中带量采购政策对中国铂类抗肿瘤药物使用及支出的影响:一项中断时间序列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 25;16:1593099. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1593099. eCollection 2025.
3
Pakistan's first medicine price deregulation policy: assessing its impact on prices, affordability, and availability of oral anti-diabetic medicines in private pharmacies.
巴基斯坦首个药品价格放开政策:评估其对私立药店口服抗糖尿病药物价格、可负担性及可获得性的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1627735. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1627735. eCollection 2025.
4
Voluntary information and price sharing database - a scoping review of the pricing and procurement landscape across eight Commonwealth Member States.自愿信息与价格共享数据库——对八个英联邦成员国定价与采购情况的范围界定审查
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jul 15;18(1):2523937. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2523937. eCollection 2025.
5
On paper; in practice: measuring compliance with official pricing policies in a large field study of essential medicines in Indonesia.理论上;实践中:在印度尼西亚一项关于基本药物的大型实地研究中衡量对官方定价政策的遵守情况。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jul 2;18(1):2521434. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2521434. eCollection 2025.
6
Counting the savings: impact of Georgia's drug policy interventions on households.计算节省的开支:佐治亚州药物政策干预对家庭的影响
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 2;24(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02535-x.
7
'We need to be part of the solution': lessons from the 2024 PPRI Conference on ensuring access to affordable medicines through innovative policies.“我们需要成为解决方案的一部分”:2024年药品价格监管指数(PPRI)会议关于通过创新政策确保可及负担得起药品的经验教训
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Dec 24;17(Suppl 1):2442002. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2442002. eCollection 2024.
8
Pharmacy practice and policy research in Türkiye: a systematic review of literature.土耳其的药学实践与政策研究:文献系统综述
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Aug 12;17(1):2385939. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2385939. eCollection 2024.