• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光水平和信噪比对噪声中语音任务诱发瞳孔反应的影响。

The Effects of Light Level and Signal-to-Noise Ratio on the Task-Evoked Pupil Response in a Speech-in-Noise Task.

机构信息

Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Oregon State University, Corvallis.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jun 6;67(6):1964-1975. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00627. Epub 2024 May 1.

DOI:10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00627
PMID:38690971
Abstract

PURPOSE

There is increasing interest in the measurement of cognitive effort during listening tasks, for both research and clinical purposes. Quantification of task-evoked pupil responses (TEPRs) is a psychophysiological method that can be used to study cognitive effort. However, light level during cognitively demanding listening tasks may affect TEPRs, complicating interpretation of listening-related changes. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of light level on TEPRs during effortful listening across a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).

METHOD

Thirty-six adults without hearing loss were asked to repeat target sentences presented in background babble noise while their pupil diameter was recorded. Light level and SNRs were manipulated in a 4 × 4 repeated-measures design. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to measure the effects.

RESULTS

Peak and mean dilation were typically larger in more adverse SNR conditions (except for SNR -6 dB) and smaller in higher light levels. Differences in mean and peak dilation between SNR conditions were larger in dim light than in brighter light.

CONCLUSIONS

Brighter light conditions make TEPRs less sensitive to variations in listening effort across levels of SNR. Therefore, light level must be considered and reported in detail to ensure sensitivity of TEPRs and for comparisons of findings across different studies. It is recommended that TEPR testing be conducted in relatively low light conditions, considering both background illumination and screen luminance.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25676538.

摘要

目的

在研究和临床目的中,人们对听力任务中认知努力的测量越来越感兴趣。量化任务诱发的瞳孔反应(TEPRs)是一种可用于研究认知努力的心理生理方法。然而,在认知要求高的听力任务期间,光水平可能会影响 TEPRs,从而使与听力相关的变化的解释复杂化。本研究的目的是检查在一系列信噪比(SNR)范围内,光水平对努力听力时 TEPRs 的影响。

方法

36 名无听力损失的成年人被要求在背景嘈杂声中重复目标句子,同时记录他们的瞳孔直径。光水平和 SNR 以 4×4 重复测量设计进行操纵。使用重复测量方差分析来测量影响。

结果

在更不利的 SNR 条件下(除 SNR-6 dB 外),峰值和平均扩张通常更大,在更高的光水平下更小。在较暗的光线下,平均和峰值扩张之间的差异在 SNR 条件之间的差异大于在较亮的光线下。

结论

较亮的光条件使 TEPRs 对 SNR 水平变化的听力努力的敏感性降低。因此,必须详细考虑和报告光水平,以确保 TEPRs 的敏感性,并在不同研究之间进行发现的比较。建议在相对低的光条件下进行 TEPR 测试,同时考虑背景照明和屏幕亮度。

补充材料

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25676538.

相似文献

1
The Effects of Light Level and Signal-to-Noise Ratio on the Task-Evoked Pupil Response in a Speech-in-Noise Task.光水平和信噪比对噪声中语音任务诱发瞳孔反应的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jun 6;67(6):1964-1975. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00627. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.瞳孔反应作为努力倾听的指示:句子可理解度的影响。
Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):480-90. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d4f251.
3
Classification of Hearing Status Based on Pupil Measures During Sentence Perception.基于句子感知过程中瞳孔测量的听力状态分类
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Mar 5;68(3):1188-1208. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00005. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
Effect of Speech-to-Noise Ratio and Luminance on a Range of Current and Potential Pupil Response Measures to Assess Listening Effort.言语噪声比和亮度对一系列当前和潜在瞳孔反应测量评估听力努力的影响。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211009351. doi: 10.1177/23312165211009351.
5
Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.瞳孔扩张所表明的刺激相关因素和听力障碍对听力努力的影响。
Hear Res. 2017 Aug;351:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 25.
6
Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.信噪比、掩蔽类型和降噪处理对瞳孔扩张反应所指示的句子识别性能和听力努力的影响。
Hear Res. 2018 Aug;365:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 6.
7
Listening Effort Measured With Pupillometry in Cochlear Implant Users Depends on Sound Level, But Not on the Signal to Noise Ratio When Using the Matrix Test.使用瞳孔测量法评估人工耳蜗使用者的听力努力程度取决于声音水平,但使用矩阵测试时与信噪比无关。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(6):1461-1473. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001529. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
8
Attention Mobilization as a Modulator of Listening Effort: Evidence From Pupillometry.注意动员作为倾听努力的调节剂:瞳孔测量的证据。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241245240. doi: 10.1177/23312165241245240.
9
Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.噪声环境下言语感知时的认知负荷:年龄、听力损失和认知对瞳孔反应的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):498-510. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb.
10
Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.在听力损失者执行噪声下言语任务时,共现被发现与一些瞳孔测量值有关。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(5):1190-1201. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001361. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Noise Reduction on Ocular Markers of Listening Effort in Hearing Aid Users in Darkness and Ambient Light.黑暗和环境光条件下助听器使用者中降噪对听觉努力的眼部标志物的影响
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251336652. doi: 10.1177/23312165251336652. Epub 2025 Apr 29.