• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言语噪声比和亮度对一系列当前和潜在瞳孔反应测量评估听力努力的影响。

Effect of Speech-to-Noise Ratio and Luminance on a Range of Current and Potential Pupil Response Measures to Assess Listening Effort.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211009351. doi: 10.1177/23312165211009351.

DOI:10.1177/23312165211009351
PMID:33926329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8111552/
Abstract

In hearing research, pupillometry is an established method of studying listening effort. The focus of this study was to evaluate several pupil measures extracted from the Task-Evoked Pupil Responses (TEPRs) in speech-in-noise test. A range of analysis approaches was applied to extract these pupil measures, namely (a) pupil peak dilation (PPD); (b) mean pupil dilation (MPD); (c) index of pupillary activity; (d) growth curve analysis (GCA); and (e) principal component analysis (PCA). The effect of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; Data Set A: -20 dB, -10 dB, +5 dB SNR) and luminance (Data Set B: 0.1 cd/m, 360 cd/m) on the TEPRs were investigated. Data Sets A and B were recorded during a speech-in-noise test and included TEPRs from 33 and 27 normal-hearing native Dutch speakers, respectively. The main results were as follows: (a) A significant effect of SNR was revealed for all pupil measures extracted in the time domain (PPD, MPD, GCA, PCA); (b) Two time series analysis approaches (GCA, PCA) provided modeled temporal profiles of TEPRs (GCA); and time windows spanning subtasks performed in a speech-in-noise test (PCA); and (c) All pupil measures revealed a significant effect of luminance. In conclusion, multiple pupil measures showed similar effects of SNR, suggesting that effort may be reflected in multiple aspects of TEPR. Moreover, a direct analysis of the pupil time course seems to provide a more holistic view of TEPRs, yet further research is needed to understand and interpret its measures. Further research is also required to find pupil measures less sensitive to changes in luminance.

摘要

在听力研究中,瞳孔测量法是一种研究听力努力的既定方法。本研究的重点是评估从语音噪声测试中的任务诱发瞳孔反应(TEPR)中提取的几种瞳孔测量值。应用了一系列分析方法来提取这些瞳孔测量值,即(a)瞳孔峰值扩张(PPD);(b)平均瞳孔扩张(MPD);(c)瞳孔活动指数;(d)生长曲线分析(GCA);和(e)主成分分析(PCA)。研究了信噪比(SNR;数据集 A:-20dB、-10dB、+5dB SNR)和亮度(数据集 B:0.1cd/m、360cd/m)对 TEPR 的影响。数据集 A 和 B 是在语音噪声测试中记录的,分别包括 33 名和 27 名正常听力的荷兰母语者的 TEPR。主要结果如下:(a)在时域中提取的所有瞳孔测量值(PPD、MPD、GCA、PCA)均显示出 SNR 的显著影响;(b)两种时间序列分析方法(GCA、PCA)提供了 TEPR 的模型化时间曲线(GCA);以及跨越语音噪声测试中执行的子任务的时间窗口(PCA);(c)所有瞳孔测量值均显示出亮度的显著影响。总之,多种瞳孔测量值显示出与 SNR 相似的影响,表明努力可能反映在 TEPR 的多个方面。此外,对瞳孔时间过程的直接分析似乎提供了对 TEPR 的更全面的了解,但需要进一步的研究来理解和解释其测量值。还需要进一步的研究来找到对亮度变化不那么敏感的瞳孔测量值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/af534de0a594/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/2ba353cd168b/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/7f1e465a1da6/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/31e9d2f50015/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/9cb9eddf24b7/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/36d3863668c7/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/588696f0483f/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/3953b1297eb4/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/8ce4e59fc2da/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/6e2b83db17be/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/af534de0a594/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/2ba353cd168b/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/7f1e465a1da6/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/31e9d2f50015/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/9cb9eddf24b7/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/36d3863668c7/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/588696f0483f/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/3953b1297eb4/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/8ce4e59fc2da/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/6e2b83db17be/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d6/8111552/af534de0a594/10.1177_23312165211009351-fig10.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Speech-to-Noise Ratio and Luminance on a Range of Current and Potential Pupil Response Measures to Assess Listening Effort.言语噪声比和亮度对一系列当前和潜在瞳孔反应测量评估听力努力的影响。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211009351. doi: 10.1177/23312165211009351.
2
Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.为了更全面地了解在进行噪声下言语测试时,掩蔽类型和信噪比对瞳孔反应的影响。
Hear Res. 2018 Nov;369:67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 12.
3
Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.信噪比、掩蔽类型和降噪处理对瞳孔扩张反应所指示的句子识别性能和听力努力的影响。
Hear Res. 2018 Aug;365:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 6.
4
Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.在听力损失者执行噪声下言语任务时,共现被发现与一些瞳孔测量值有关。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(5):1190-1201. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001361. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.瞳孔反应作为努力倾听的指示:句子可理解度的影响。
Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):480-90. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d4f251.
6
Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.瞳孔扩张所表明的刺激相关因素和听力障碍对听力努力的影响。
Hear Res. 2017 Aug;351:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 25.
7
The Effects of Light Level and Signal-to-Noise Ratio on the Task-Evoked Pupil Response in a Speech-in-Noise Task.光水平和信噪比对噪声中语音任务诱发瞳孔反应的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jun 6;67(6):1964-1975. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00627. Epub 2024 May 1.
8
Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.噪声环境下言语感知时的认知负荷:年龄、听力损失和认知对瞳孔反应的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):498-510. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb.
9
Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.骨锚定式助听系统使用者的最大力输出增加对聆听努力的益处:瞳孔测量研究。
Ear Hear. 2019 Sep/Oct;40(5):1220-1232. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000699.
10
Listening Effort Measured With Pupillometry in Cochlear Implant Users Depends on Sound Level, But Not on the Signal to Noise Ratio When Using the Matrix Test.使用瞳孔测量法评估人工耳蜗使用者的听力努力程度取决于声音水平,但使用矩阵测试时与信噪比无关。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(6):1461-1473. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001529. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Noise Reduction on Ocular Markers of Listening Effort in Hearing Aid Users in Darkness and Ambient Light.黑暗和环境光条件下助听器使用者中降噪对听觉努力的眼部标志物的影响
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251336652. doi: 10.1177/23312165251336652. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
Relations Among Multiple Dimensions of Self-Reported Listening Effort in Response to an Auditory Psychomotor Vigilance Task.报告的听觉动觉警戒任务中自我报告的听力努力的多个维度之间的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Sep 12;67(9):3217-3231. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00465. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
3
Combining Multiple Psychophysiological Measures of Listening Effort: Challenges and Recommendations.

本文引用的文献

1
Pupillary and Microsaccadic Responses to Cognitive Effort and Emotional Arousal During Complex Decision Making.复杂决策过程中对认知努力和情绪唤醒的瞳孔及微扫视反应。
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 May 17;13(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.5.2.
2
Neural indices of listening effort in noisy environments.嘈杂环境下的听力努力神经指标。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 2;9(1):11278. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47643-1.
3
Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.个体努力的差异:评估失聪者的瞳孔测量结果。
结合多种听力努力的心理生理测量方法:挑战与建议
Semin Hear. 2023 Mar 28;44(2):95-105. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767669. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Time Scales and Moments of Listening Effort Revealed in Pupillometry.瞳孔测量法揭示的听力努力的时间尺度和瞬间
Semin Hear. 2023 Apr 4;44(2):106-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767741. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise.时间特异性瞳孔反应成分揭示了在噪声中言语识别过程中记忆任务需求引起的努力分配的变化。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231153280. doi: 10.1177/23312165231153280.
6
Luminance effects on pupil dilation in speech-in-noise recognition.亮度对噪声中言语识别瞳孔扩张的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 2;17(12):e0278506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278506. eCollection 2022.
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519845596. doi: 10.1177/2331216519845596.
4
Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data.分析瞳孔测量数据的时程。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519832483. doi: 10.1177/2331216519832483.
5
Hearing impairment and daily-life fatigue: a qualitative study.听力障碍与日常生活疲劳:一项定性研究。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Jul;58(7):408-416. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1597284. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
6
Cluster-based permutation tests of MEG/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location.基于聚类的脑磁图/脑电图数据置换检验不能确定效应潜伏期或位置的显著性。
Psychophysiology. 2019 Jun;56(6):e13335. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13335. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
7
The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in pupillometry.人类任务诱发的瞳孔反应函数是线性的:对瞳孔测量中基线反应标度的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):865-878. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1134-4.
8
Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.使用瞳孔测量法测量听力努力的最佳实践和建议:入门指南。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518800869. doi: 10.1177/2331216518800869.
9
The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.听觉刺激的瞳孔扩张反应:现有知识状况。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518777174. doi: 10.1177/2331216518777174.
10
Psychophysiological measurement of affective responses during speech perception.言语感知过程中的情感反应的心理生理学测量。
Hear Res. 2018 Nov;369:103-119. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Aug 10.