Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Gujrat, Ibn-e-Khaldun Block (R212), Gujrat, Pakistan.
J Relig Health. 2024 Oct;63(5):3692-3713. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02037-0. Epub 2024 May 1.
This qualitative study was conducted to explore the common dyadic coping (DC) efforts of married couples, with a chronically ill partner. The sample for the study consisted of twelve couples chosen from Gujrat, Pakistan. The semi-structured interviews were conducted with the help of an interview guide and analyzed using thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006). The following four major themes were emerged: "common problem-focused DC," "common emotion-focused DC," "common religious DC," and "combined pattern of intimate relationships." The findings indicated that partners are not preferring relational coping resources for problem- and emotion-focused DC. However, the majority of couples participate in religious DC process in a complementary way to cope with stressful situation in the result of chronic illness. The study also indicated various indigenous factors, for example, socioeconomic status, family culture, lack of physical resource, and religious standpoints contributing in the lack of connectivity and sexual intimacy. To conclude, the results revealed that future research is required to investigate the patient and partner's relationship in greater depth, focusing on above-mentioned contextual factors.
本定性研究旨在探讨慢性疾病患者配偶的夫妻共同应对策略。研究对象为来自巴基斯坦古吉拉特邦的 12 对夫妇。采用访谈指南进行半结构化访谈,并运用主题分析法(Braun and Clarke, 2006)进行分析。主要得出以下 4 个主题:“共同问题焦点应对”、“共同情绪焦点应对”、“共同宗教应对”和“亲密关系的综合模式”。研究结果表明,伴侣并不倾向于在问题和情绪焦点应对中使用关系应对资源。然而,大多数夫妇以互补的方式参与宗教应对过程,以应对慢性疾病带来的压力。研究还表明,各种本土因素,如社会经济地位、家庭文化、缺乏物质资源和宗教观点,都导致了夫妻之间缺乏联系和性亲密感。总之,研究结果表明,未来的研究需要更深入地调查患者和伴侣的关系,重点关注上述背景因素。