Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 14B, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden; MedTech Science & Innovation Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Kela, Nordenskiöldinkatu 12, 00250 Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jul;187:105465. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105465. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Approaches to implementing online record access (ORA) via patient portals for minors and guardians vary internationally, as more countries continue to develop patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHR) systems. Evidence of ORA usage and country-specific practices to allow or block minors' and guardians' access to minors' records during adolescence (i.e. access control practices) may provide a broader understanding of possible approaches and their implications for minors' confidentiality and guardian support.
To describe and compare minors' and guardian proxy users' PAEHR usage in Sweden and Finland. Furthermore, to investigate the use of country-specific access control practices.
A retrospective, observational case study was conducted. Data were collected from PAEHR administration services in Sweden and Finland and proportional use was calculated based on population statistics. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results.
In both Sweden and Finland, the proportion of adolescents accessing their PAEHR increased from younger to older age-groups reaching the proportion of 59.9 % in Sweden and 84.8 % in Finland in the age-group of 17-year-olds. The PAEHR access gap during early adolescence in Sweden may explain the lower proportion of users among those who enter adulthood. Around half of guardians in Finland accessed their minor children's records in 2022 (46.1 %), while Swedish guardian use was the highest in 2022 for newborn children (41.8 %), and decreased thereafter. Few, mainly guardians, applied for extended access in Sweden. In Finland, where a case-by-case approach to access control relies on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) consideration of a minor's maturity, 95.8 % of minors chose to disclose prescription information to their guardians.
While age-based access control practices can hamper ORA for minors and guardians, case-by-case approach requires HCP resources and careful guidance to ensure equality between patients. Guardians primarily access minors' records during early childhood and adolescents show willingness to share their PAEHR with parents.
越来越多的国家正在开发可供患者访问的电子健康记录(PAEHR)系统,因此,通过患者门户为未成年人和监护人实施在线记录访问(ORA)的方法在国际上有所不同。ORA 使用情况和允许或阻止未成年人及其监护人在青春期访问未成年人记录的特定国家做法(即访问控制做法)的证据,可以更全面地了解可能的方法及其对未成年人保密性和监护人支持的影响。
描述并比较瑞典和芬兰未成年人及其监护人代理用户对 PAEHR 的使用情况。此外,还调查了特定国家访问控制做法的使用情况。
采用回顾性、观察性病例研究。数据来自瑞典和芬兰的 PAEHR 管理服务,根据人口统计数据计算出比例使用情况。使用描述性统计来分析结果。
在瑞典和芬兰,从年轻到年长年龄组,访问 PAEHR 的青少年比例均有所增加,在瑞典,17 岁年龄组的比例达到 59.9%,在芬兰,该比例达到 84.8%。瑞典青少年早期的 PAEHR 访问差距可能解释了成年后用户比例较低的原因。2022 年,芬兰约有一半的监护人访问了他们未成年子女的记录(46.1%),而瑞典的监护人使用率在 2022 年对新生儿最高(41.8%),此后有所下降。瑞典只有少数监护人(主要是监护人)申请扩展访问。在芬兰,访问控制采用逐案处理的方法,取决于医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对未成年人成熟度的考虑,95.8%的未成年人选择向其监护人披露处方信息。
虽然基于年龄的访问控制做法可能会阻碍未成年人和监护人的 ORA,但逐案处理方法需要 HCP 资源和精心指导,以确保患者之间的平等。监护人主要在儿童早期和青少年时期访问未成年人的记录,他们愿意与父母分享他们的 PAEHR。