Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jan;181:105302. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105302. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
Poor usability is a barrier to widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHR). Providing good usability is especially challenging in the health care context, as there is a wide variety of patient users. Usability benchmarking is an approach for improving usability by evaluating and comparing the strength and weaknesses of systems. The main purpose of this study is to benchmark usability of patient portals across countries.
A mixed-methods survey approach was applied to benchmark the national patient portals offering patient access to EHR in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. These Nordic countries have similar public healthcare systems, and they are pioneers in offering patients access to EHR for several years. In a survey of 29,334 patients, both patients' quantitative ratings of usability and their qualitative descriptions of very positive and very negative peak experiences of portal use were collected.
The usability scores ranged from good to fair level of usability. The narratives of very positive and very negative experiences included the benefits of the patient portals and experienced usability issues. The regression analysis of results showed that very positive and negative experiences of patient portal use explain 19-35% of the variation of usability scores in the four countries. The percentage of patients who reported very positive or very negative experiences in each country was unrelated to the usability scores across countries.
The survey approach could be used to evaluate usability with a wide variety of users and it supported learning from comparison across the countries. The combination of quantitative and qualitative data provided an approximation of the level of the perceived usability, and identified usability issues to be improved and useful features that patients appreciate. Further work is needed to improve the comparability of the varied samples across countries.
电子健康记录(EHR)的可用性差是其广泛应用的障碍。在医疗保健环境中,提供良好的可用性尤其具有挑战性,因为患者用户的种类繁多。可用性基准测试是一种通过评估和比较系统的优缺点来提高可用性的方法。本研究的主要目的是对各国的患者门户的可用性进行基准测试。
采用混合方法调查方法对爱沙尼亚、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的国家患者门户进行基准测试,这些国家的患者门户允许患者访问 EHR。这些北欧国家拥有相似的公共医疗体系,并在为患者提供 EHR 访问方面领先多年。在对 29334 名患者进行的调查中,收集了患者对可用性的定量评分以及他们对门户使用的非常积极和非常消极的高峰体验的定性描述。
可用性评分从良好到尚可。非常积极和非常消极体验的描述包括患者门户的益处和体验到的可用性问题。对结果的回归分析表明,患者门户使用的非常积极和非常消极体验可以解释四个国家的可用性评分变化的 19-35%。每个国家报告非常积极或非常消极体验的患者比例与各国之间的可用性评分无关。
该调查方法可用于评估具有广泛用户的可用性,并支持通过各国之间的比较进行学习。定量和定性数据的结合提供了感知可用性水平的近似值,并确定了需要改进的可用性问题和患者欣赏的有用功能。需要进一步努力提高各国之间不同样本的可比性。