Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Regional Specialist Hospital in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Oct 14;30:e945227. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945227.
BACKGROUND To evaluate neuromuscular monitoring during anesthesia with mivacurium, this study assessed the correlation between measurements of TOF-Cuff® placed on the lower leg and stimulating the tibial nerve and TOF-Scan® values from the adductor pollicis muscle. Additionally, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBO) blood pressure measured in both locations were compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-six patients participated in this observational clinical trial. The TOF-Cuff® was placed on the lower leg and the TOF-Scan® was placed on the thumb. Train-of-four (TOF) values were recorded simultaneously by both devices at 30-second intervals before intubation. Measurements continued every 5 minutes until extubation. Bland-Altman analyses compared TOF values obtained from the 2 devices. RESULTS Time to onset and relaxation time did not differ significantly; the number of patients presenting a lack of blockade despite TOF=0 was also concordant. The time from the last dose of mivacurium to TOF ratio >90 was shorter on the leg than on hand (median 20 [5-28, 0-65] min vs 30 [20-35, 0-60] min, p=0.025). The median (range, interquartile range) difference between measurements was: 11.6 (-41 to 45, 2-19) for SBP and -8 (-28 to 26, -15 to -4) for DBP at baseline (p=0.0495); 5 (-53 to 55, -2 to 9) for SBP and -11 (-45 to 29, -19 to -5) (p=0.0017) for DBP during the blockade. CONCLUSIONS Time-to-onset and SBP are comparable between these 2 methods, in contrast to time-to-recovery and diastolic blood pressure, and this should be considered in case of the inability to apply the TOF-Cuff on the leg.
为了评估米库氯铵麻醉期间的神经肌肉监测,本研究评估了放置在小腿上的 TOF-Cuff®和刺激胫神经与放置在拇指上的 TOF-Scan®之间的相关性。此外,还比较了这两个部位的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。
26 名患者参与了这项观察性临床试验。将 TOF-Cuff®放置在小腿上,将 TOF-Scan®放置在拇指上。在插管前以 30 秒的间隔用这两种设备同时记录四肌搐(TOF)值。测量一直持续到拔管,每隔 5 分钟一次。Bland-Altman 分析比较了两种设备获得的 TOF 值。
潜伏期和松弛时间无显著差异;尽管 TOF=0 但仍存在阻滞不全的患者数量也一致。从米库氯铵最后一次给药到 TOF 比值>90 的时间在手和腿上的差异有统计学意义(中位数分别为 20[5-28,0-65]min 和 30[20-35,0-60]min,p=0.025)。基础值时(中位数[范围,四分位距])两种测量方法的差异:收缩压 11.6[41-55,2-19]mmHg(p=0.0495),舒张压-8[-28-26,-15--4]mmHg;阻滞期间收缩压 5[-53-55,-2-9]mmHg(p=0.0017),舒张压-11[-45-29,-19--5]mmHg。
与恢复时间和舒张压不同,这两种方法的潜伏期和收缩压相当,在腿部无法应用 TOF-Cuff 时应考虑这一点。