Borghi Olaf, Voracek Martin, Tran Ulrich S
Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
University Research Platform "The Stress of Life (SOLE) - Processes and Mechanisms underlying Everyday Life Stress", University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 16;15:1272720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1272720. eCollection 2024.
Mindfulness is frequently seen as a protective factor of stress, but self-report measures of mindfulness may overlap with other related constructs, such as mental health, and could thus not only be a predictor, but also an outcome of stress. This study thus aimed to examine the longitudinal bidirectional associations between the use and perceived helpfulness of the four mindfulness facets Observe, Describe, Nonjudge, and Nonreact with daily perceived stress.
Participants from a large ( = 1,276) mixed student and community group sample filled out a brief daily diary over the time span of 7 days. Bidirectional cross-lagged effects were investigated using the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model, an extension of the traditional cross-lagged panel model that allows to differentiate between stable between-unit differences and time-varying within-unit dynamics. In addition, we controlled for several baseline and sociodemographic confounders.
At the within-subject level, the use of Actaware was associated with higher perceived stress on the next day ( = 0.03, = 0.029). The use ( = -0.04, = 0.025) and perceived helpfulness ( = -0.05, = 0.014) of Nonreact were associated with lower perceived stress on the next day. In turn, perceived stress was associated with lower perceived helpfulness of Describe ( = -0.04, = 0.037) and Nonreact ( = -0.03, = 0.038) on the next day. In addition, there were several residual correlations between mindfulness facets and perceived stress within days. At the between-subject level, there was a positive association between the random intercept of Describe and daily stress ( = 0.15, = 0.003). In addition, while baseline perceived stress was negatively associated with the random intercepts of the mindfulness facets, two baseline components of mindfulness were not associated with the random intercept of perceived stress.
On the currently investigated time scale, our results challenge prior results and assumptions regarding mindfulness as a buffering and protective factor against daily stress. With the exception of Nonreact, mindfulness was either positively associated with perceived stress, or in turn perceived stress appeared to interfere with the ability to stay mindful in daily life.
正念常常被视为压力的一个保护因素,但正念的自我报告测量可能与其他相关构念(如心理健康)重叠,因此它不仅可能是压力的一个预测因素,也可能是压力的一个结果。因此,本研究旨在考察正念的四个方面(观察、描述、不评判、不反应)的运用及感知到的有用性与每日感知到的压力之间的纵向双向关联。
来自一个大型(n = 1276)的学生与社区混合群体样本的参与者在7天时间内填写一份简短的每日日记。使用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型来研究双向交叉滞后效应,该模型是传统交叉滞后面板模型的扩展,能够区分稳定的组间差异和随时间变化的组内动态变化。此外,我们控制了几个基线和社会人口学混杂因素。
在个体内部层面,运用“觉察当下”与次日更高的感知压力相关(β = 0.03,SE = 0.029)。“不反应”的运用(β = -0.04,SE = 0.025)和感知到的有用性(β = -0.05,SE = 0.014)与次日更低的感知压力相关。反过来,感知压力与次日“描述”(β = -0.04,SE = 0.037)和“不反应”(β = -0.03,SE = 0.038)的更低感知有用性相关。此外,在同一天内,正念各方面与感知压力之间存在若干残差相关性。在个体之间层面,“描述”的随机截距与每日压力之间存在正相关(β = 0.15,SE = 0.003)。此外,虽然基线感知压力与正念各方面的随机截距呈负相关,但正念的两个基线成分与感知压力的随机截距不相关。
在当前所考察的时间尺度上,我们的结果挑战了先前关于正念作为抵御日常压力的缓冲和保护因素的结果及假设。除了“不反应”之外,正念要么与感知压力呈正相关,要么反过来,感知压力似乎会干扰在日常生活中保持正念的能力。