Suppr超能文献

不同感觉加工敏感性水平个体的情绪调节目标与策略:一项潜在剖面分析

Emotion regulation goals and strategies among individuals with varying levels of sensory processing sensitivity: a latent profile analysis.

作者信息

Liu Yiran, Tian Feng

机构信息

School of Humanities and Social Science, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

Department of Psychiatry, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 17;15:1364648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1364648. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emotion regulation (ER) has emerged as a significant factor influencing the well-being of individuals with high sensory processing sensitivity (SPS). However, the interaction between SPS and the underlying mechanisms of ER remains largely unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to (a) identify profiles of SPS and ER competency using a latent profile analysis (LPA), and (b) investigate the ER goals and strategy use among each profile to better understand ER patterns in highly sensitive individuals with lower ER proficiency.

METHODS

A total of 813 Chinese college students (mean age = 21.53 ± 2.48; 74.41% female) completed the Highly Sensitive Person Scale, 16-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, Emotion Regulation Goals Scale, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, and the rumination subscale from the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The LPA identified three profiles: "Low SPS - High ER Competency" (41%), "Moderate SPS - ER Competency" (41%), and "High SPS - Low ER Competency" (18%). ER goals varied significantly among these groups. The "High SPS - Low ER Competency" group predominantly pursued contra-hedonic goals and impression management goals, while the "Low SPS - High ER Competency" group focused on pro-hedonic goals. In terms of strategies, the "Low SPS - High ER Competency" group mainly used cognitive reappraisal, the "Moderate SPS - ER Competency" group leaned towards suppression, and the "High SPS - Low ER Competency" group preferred rumination and suppression.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that higher SPS combined with lower ER proficiency is linked to an increased pursuit of contra-hedonic goals and impression management goals, and a reliance on response-focused strategies. This pattern offers new insights for developing psychological support strategies for highly sensitive individuals experiencing mental distress.

摘要

背景

情绪调节(ER)已成为影响高感官处理敏感性(SPS)个体幸福感的一个重要因素。然而,SPS与ER潜在机制之间的相互作用在很大程度上仍未得到探索。

目的

本研究旨在(a)使用潜在剖面分析(LPA)确定SPS和ER能力的剖面,以及(b)调查每个剖面中的ER目标和策略使用情况,以更好地理解ER能力较低的高敏感个体的ER模式。

方法

共有813名中国大学生(平均年龄=21.53±2.48;74.41%为女性)完成了高敏感人群量表、16项情绪调节困难量表、情绪调节目标量表、情绪调节问卷以及认知情绪调节问卷中的反刍分量表。

结果

LPA确定了三个剖面:“低SPS - 高ER能力”(41%)、“中度SPS - ER能力”(41%)和“高SPS - 低ER能力”(18%)。这些组之间的ER目标存在显著差异。“高SPS - 低ER能力”组主要追求反享乐目标和印象管理目标,而“低SPS - 高ER能力”组专注于享乐目标。在策略方面,“低SPS - 高ER能力”组主要使用认知重评,“中度SPS - ER能力”组倾向于抑制,“高SPS - 低ER能力”组更喜欢反刍和抑制。

结论

这些发现表明,较高的SPS与较低的ER能力相结合,与对反享乐目标和印象管理目标的追求增加以及对以反应为中心的策略的依赖有关。这种模式为为经历心理困扰的高敏感个体制定心理支持策略提供了新的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01e/11061520/534c64f0818e/fpsyg-15-1364648-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验