• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体情绪调节目标的差异:人格是否能预测人们调节情绪的原因?

Individual differences in emotion regulation goals: Does personality predict the reasons why people regulate their emotions?

机构信息

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

J Pers. 2019 Aug;87(4):750-766. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12430. Epub 2018 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1111/jopy.12430
PMID:30246480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6431278/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated how the Big Five traits predict individual differences in five theoretically important emotion regulation goals that are commonly pursued-pro-hedonic, contra-hedonic, performance, pro-social, and impression management.

METHOD

We conducted two studies: (a) a large survey study consisting of undergraduates (N = 394; 18-25 years; 69% female; 56% European American) and community adults (N = 302; 19-74 years; 50% female; 75% European American) who completed a newly developed global measure of individual differences in emotion regulation goals and (b) a 9-day daily diary study with community adults (N = 272; 23-85 years; 50% female; 84% European American) who completed daily reports of emotion regulation goals. In both studies, participants completed a measure of the Big Five.

RESULTS

Across global and daily measures, pro-hedonic goals and pro-social goals were positively associated with Agreeableness, performance goals were positively associated with Openness, and impression management goals were positively associated with Neuroticism. Globally, contra-hedonic goals were also negatively associated with Agreeableness and Conscientiousness.

CONCLUSIONS

The Big Five systematically predict the emotion regulation goals people typically pursue. These findings have important implications for understanding why people engage in certain forms of regulatory behavior and why personality has consequences for well-being.

摘要

目的

我们调查了五大特质如何预测五个理论上重要的情绪调节目标的个体差异,这五个目标是普遍追求的——享乐、反享乐、表现、亲社会和印象管理。

方法

我们进行了两项研究:(a)一项大型调查研究,包括本科生(N=394;18-25 岁;69%女性;56%欧洲裔美国人)和社区成年人(N=302;19-74 岁;50%女性;75%欧洲裔美国人),他们完成了一项新开发的情绪调节目标个体差异的全球衡量标准;(b)一项为期 9 天的社区成年人日常日记研究(N=272;23-85 岁;50%女性;84%欧洲裔美国人),他们每天报告情绪调节目标。在这两项研究中,参与者都完成了五大特质的测量。

结果

在全球和日常衡量标准中,享乐目标和亲社会目标与宜人性呈正相关,表现目标与开放性呈正相关,印象管理目标与神经质呈正相关。全球范围内,反享乐目标与宜人性和尽责性呈负相关。

结论

五大特质系统地预测了人们通常追求的情绪调节目标。这些发现对理解为什么人们会采取某些形式的调节行为以及为什么个性对幸福感有影响具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in emotion regulation goals: Does personality predict the reasons why people regulate their emotions?个体情绪调节目标的差异:人格是否能预测人们调节情绪的原因?
J Pers. 2019 Aug;87(4):750-766. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12430. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
2
Regulating for a reason: Emotion regulation goals are linked to spontaneous strategy use.有目的的调节:情绪调节目标与自发策略的使用相关联。
J Pers. 2019 Oct;87(5):948-961. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12447. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
Do the Big Five personality traits predict individual differences in the left cheek bias for emotion perception?大五人格特质能否预测情绪感知中左脸颊偏向的个体差异?
Laterality. 2016;21(3):200-14. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2016.1146738. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
4
Distinguishing Emotion Regulation Success in Daily Life From Maladaptive Regulation and Dysregulation.区分日常生活中的情绪调节成功与适应不良调节和失调。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 May;28(2):209-224. doi: 10.1177/10888683231199140. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
5
Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Personality, and Problematic Smartphone Use.情绪调节困难、人格特质与智能手机成瘾问题。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Apr;24(4):275-281. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0328. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals.日常生活中的情绪调节策略选择:社会背景和目标的作用。
Motiv Emot. 2017 Apr;41(2):230-242. doi: 10.1007/s11031-016-9597-z. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
Emotion Goals: A Missing Piece in Research on Psychopathy and Emotion Regulation.情感目标:精神病态与情绪调节研究中缺失的一环。
J Pers Disord. 2021 Mar;35(Suppl A):57-82. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2020_34_488. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
8
An Economic Perspective on Personality Traits and Alcohol Misuse: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study.人格特质与酒精滥用的经济学视角:来自健康与退休研究的证据。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Jun;18(2):75-92.
9
Positive emotion dispositions and emotion regulation in the Italian population.意大利人群中的积极情绪倾向和情绪调节。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 2;16(3):e0245545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245545. eCollection 2021.
10
Personality, Emotional Qualities of Leisure, and Subjective Well-Being in the Elderly.老年人的人格、休闲的情感特质与主观幸福感
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2017 Jul;85(2):164-184. doi: 10.1177/0091415016685329. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Dimensions of music use motivations: Genetic and environmental underpinnings, and associations with Big Five and Empathy traits.音乐使用动机的维度:遗传和环境基础,以及与大五人格和共情特质的关联。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0329808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329808. eCollection 2025.
2
Emotion Dysregulation in College Students: Contributions of Maladaptive Personality Traits and Momentary Affect.大学生的情绪失调:适应不良人格特质和瞬间情绪的影响
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2025;47(3):65. doi: 10.1007/s10862-025-10243-7. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
3
Maladaptive personality and the efficiency of response-focused emotion regulation strategies: a study on suppression and acceptance.适应不良人格与以反应为中心的情绪调节策略的效率:一项关于抑制和接纳的研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 31;13(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02873-z.
4
How Often and Why Do People Manage Their Emotions in Older Adulthood?老年人管理情绪的频率及原因是什么?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 May 8;80(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf031.
5
Examining emotion reactivity to politically polarizing media in a randomized controlled trial of mindfulness training versus active coping training.在一项正念训练与积极应对训练的随机对照试验中,研究对政治极化媒体的情绪反应。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):5209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84510-0.
6
Depression and emotion regulation strategy use moderate age-related attentional positivity bias.抑郁症与情绪调节策略运用存在适度的与年龄相关的注意力积极偏向。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 16;15:1427480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1427480. eCollection 2024.
7
Factor structure of the Chinese version of Emotion Regulation Goals Scale.中文版情绪调节目标量表的因子结构
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 8;15:1392879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1392879. eCollection 2024.
8
Emotional self-regulation and personality in the light of Thomas Aquinas's philosophical anthropology.从托马斯·阿奎那的哲学人类学角度看情绪自我调节与人格
Front Psychol. 2024 May 31;15:1419202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1419202. eCollection 2024.
9
Which emotion regulation strategy is efficient for whom? Reappraisal and suppression efficiency for adaptive and maladaptive personality profiles.哪种情绪调节策略对谁有效?适应性和适应不良人格特征的重新评价和抑制效率。
J Pers. 2025 Apr;93(2):463-488. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12948. Epub 2024 May 27.
10
Emotion regulation goals and strategies among individuals with varying levels of sensory processing sensitivity: a latent profile analysis.不同感觉加工敏感性水平个体的情绪调节目标与策略:一项潜在剖面分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 17;15:1364648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1364648. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulating for a reason: Emotion regulation goals are linked to spontaneous strategy use.有目的的调节:情绪调节目标与自发策略的使用相关联。
J Pers. 2019 Oct;87(5):948-961. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12447. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
2
Another year older, another year wiser? Emotion regulation strategy selection and flexibility across adulthood.又年长一岁,又更睿智一些?成年期情绪调节策略选择和灵活性。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Jun;33(4):572-585. doi: 10.1037/pag0000251. Epub 2018 May 10.
3
Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals.日常生活中的情绪调节策略选择:社会背景和目标的作用。
Motiv Emot. 2017 Apr;41(2):230-242. doi: 10.1007/s11031-016-9597-z. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
4
The incremental validity of average state self-reports over global self-reports of personality.平均状态自评相对于人格的整体自评的增量有效性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Aug;115(2):321-337. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000136. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
5
Instrumental motives in negative emotion regulation in daily life: Frequency, consistency, and predictors.日常生活中负面情绪调节的工具性动机:频率、一致性及预测因素
Emotion. 2017 Jun;17(4):648-657. doi: 10.1037/emo0000269. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
6
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Are traits useful? Explaining trait manifestations as tools in the pursuit of goals.特质有用吗?将特质表现解释为追求目标的工具。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Feb;110(2):287-301. doi: 10.1037/a0039490. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
8
Sad as a Matter of Choice? Emotion-Regulation Goals in Depression.悲伤是一种选择吗?抑郁症中的情绪调节目标。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1216-28. doi: 10.1177/0956797615583295. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
Why Do People Regulate Their Emotions? A Taxonomy of Motives in Emotion Regulation.人们为什么要调节情绪?情绪调节动机的分类学。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 Aug;20(3):199-222. doi: 10.1177/1088868315586325. Epub 2015 May 26.
10
The psychology of home environments: a call for research on residential space.家庭环境心理学:呼吁对居住空间进行研究。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 May;10(3):346-56. doi: 10.1177/1745691615576761.